[文法] She is hard to please.

看板Eng-Class作者 (huah)時間14年前 (2011/04/27 19:42), 編輯推噓15(15推 0噓 33→)
留言48則, 8人參與, 最新討論串1/1
不好意思，請問.. She is hard to please. (她很難取悅。) 這句是什麼句型來的? 為什麼不用She is hard to be pleased.表達? 不是"被取悅"被動的意思嗎? 先謝謝各位了^^ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.229.168.60
推
04/27 19:54, , 1F
please本身就是取悅某人的動詞 you please her
04/27 19:54, 1F
→
04/27 20:09, , 2F
我知道please的意思，只是第二句哪裡錯了呢?謝謝^^
04/27 20:09, 2F
推
04/27 21:07, , 3F
please的及物用法. This job is easy to do (vt).
04/27 21:07, 3F
→
04/27 21:09, , 4F
She is hard to work with. (受詞連回she).
04/27 21:09, 4F
→
04/27 21:10, , 5F
第2句在文法上沒錯，但我想不出錯在哪或習慣不這麼用
04/27 21:10, 5F
→
04/27 21:10, , 6F
另一種用法It is hard to please her.(it 代表後面的不定v)
04/27 21:10, 6F
→
04/28 06:10, , 7F
She is hard to please.這句本身就是錯誤的~因為She並不會
04/28 06:10, 7F
→
04/28 06:11, , 8F
hard~是取悅她這件事情在hard~故~應該改成如sellgd大的寫法
04/28 06:11, 8F
→
04/28 06:12, , 9F
It is hard (for you or for anyone else) to please her.
04/28 06:12, 9F
→
04/28 06:43, , 10F
she's hard to please這句沒有錯 你可以這樣想: she is
04/28 06:43, 10F
→
04/28 06:44, , 11F
(adj) - "hard to please"算是adjective 可能本來是寫
04/28 06:44, 11F
→
04/28 06:45, , 12F
hard-to-please然後連接號漸漸不見了
04/28 06:45, 12F
→
04/28 06:45, , 13F
"It is hard to please her"也可以 不過若這麼寫,focus就
04/28 06:45, 13F
→
04/28 06:46, , 14F
不一樣~ ^^
04/28 06:46, 14F
推
04/28 10:12, , 15F
樓上寫的..看無 @@a
04/28 10:12, 15F
推
04/28 11:20, , 16F
第1句句構通常只出現在某些形容詞,要合邏輯就是
04/28 11:20, 16F
→
04/28 11:21, , 17F
只是我也歸納不出這類形容詞的通性
04/28 11:21, 17F
→
04/28 11:22, , 18F
hard to please 比hard-to-please(形)的用法早，而非反之
04/28 11:22, 18F
→
04/28 11:23, , 19F
再回原文，這句形來自特定形容詞，原本我以為你問題在pleas
04/28 11:23, 19F
推
04/28 13:59, , 20F
She is hard to please (her).
04/28 13:59, 20F
推
04/28 14:33, , 21F
樓上的不對哦，please及物要連回she，你加了her就多餘了
04/28 14:33, 21F
推
04/28 16:45, , 22F
不定詞不是省略受詞嗎
04/28 16:45, 22F
推
04/28 16:47, , 23F
受詞就是主詞的She 所以her省略
04/28 16:47, 23F
→
04/28 16:48, , 24F
It is hard to please her. She is hard to please(her)
04/28 16:48, 24F
推
04/28 16:50, , 25F
而且一二句要說不同是第一句有隱含你想取悅但很難
04/28 16:50, 25F
→
04/28 16:51, , 26F
而第二句不一定是指被動態 當形容詞形容一個恆常性格
04/28 16:51, 26F
→
04/28 16:52, , 27F
受詞省略部分我想我沒記錯 兩句差異是憑不負責語感
04/28 16:52, 27F
推
04/28 16:57, , 28F
She is hard to please her. 不對，不然你中譯看看
04/28 16:57, 28F
推
04/28 16:59, , 29F
例如She is (a) difficult (person) to work with.
04/28 16:59, 29F
→
04/28 17:00, , 30F
另這類句子並非受詞省略，是早就出現了(主詞)
04/28 17:00, 30F
→
04/28 17:02, , 31F
She's a difficult person,whom nobody is able to please.
04/28 17:02, 31F
→
04/28 17:03, , 32F
及物動詞please後不能再加受詞了(已出現)
04/28 17:03, 32F
→
04/28 17:03, , 33F
She is hard (for us) to please. (和被動也無關)
04/28 17:03, 33F
推
04/28 17:06, , 34F
The cake is soft[delicious] to eat.
04/28 17:06, 34F
→
04/28 21:35, , 35F
所以如果she is hard to please是從it is hard to
04/28 21:35, 35F
→
04/28 21:36, , 36F
please her來的，理論上就不會有she is hard to
04/28 21:36, 36F
→
04/28 21:37, , 37F
be pleased.了，對不對?!因為還原的句子為:
04/28 21:37, 37F
→
04/28 21:38, , 38F
It is hard to be pleased her.(X)
04/28 21:38, 38F
推
04/28 23:55, , 39F
如果看文馨字典的話，這類形容詞會列出句型
04/28 23:55, 39F
→
04/28 23:55, , 40F
不是每個形容詞都可以用此句型 我想歸類，但要找很多字
04/28 23:55, 40F
→
04/28 23:57, , 41F
會不會形容詞和動詞必須有邏輯關聯 如難取悅 好吃 買得便宜
04/28 23:57, 41F
→
04/28 23:58, , 42F
This stuff is cheap to buy. (不確定正確，但好像ok)
04/28 23:58, 42F
→
04/28 23:59, , 43F
這東西可以買得便宜 (to buy 當副詞??)
04/28 23:59, 43F
推
04/29 00:02, , 44F
教你一個方法 google "形容詞 to" 後面有出現原形及物動
04/29 00:02, 44F
→
04/29 00:03, , 45F
試過這方法，好像多數為困難與簡單之類的形容詞 good也可
04/29 00:03, 45F
推
05/01 01:02, , 46F
這個問題我也困擾很久 應該要討論to後面動詞的主語是否
05/01 01:02, 46F
→
05/01 01:03, , 47F
仍然是She~~ 我的理解是to後面的主語已經是You I之類的
05/01 01:03, 47F
→
05/01 01:04, , 48F
所以就不會以被動式的方式呈現~
05/01 01:04, 48F
‣ 更多 laihuah 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Dk04tDN (Eng-Class)