[文法] where are you going 後面為何不用加to?

看板Eng-Class作者 (小指的願望)時間14年前 (2011/03/16 14:12), 編輯推噓1(1推 0噓 17→)
留言18則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
日前在教學生英文時,有教到 What are you looking at? at不可以省略 What are you talking about? about不可以省略 後來學生就問那 Where are you going? 後面為什麼不用加to... 請問大家一下為什麼?? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 163.30.94.211
→
03/16 14:28, , 1F
答案就在問題中
03/16 14:28, 1F
→
03/16 14:29, , 2F
因為，一個是what一個是where
03/16 14:29, 2F
→
03/16 14:31, , 3F
what是疑問代名詞，where是疑問副詞
03/16 14:31, 3F
→
03/16 14:32, , 4F
他們要問的東西詞性不同，導致以上的差別
03/16 14:32, 4F
推
03/16 16:33, , 5F
我猜本來人家會說to where are you going或where are you
03/16 16:33, 5F
→
03/16 16:40, , 6F
going to 後來就越來越少加to 聽起來怪怪的
03/16 16:40, 6F
→
03/16 16:43, , 7F
因為我們小時候聽老師說 不要在句子後面用介詞 所以我們
03/16 16:43, 7F
→
03/16 16:44, , 8F
會試著避免用 XD
03/16 16:44, 8F
→
03/16 16:54, , 9F
不可能本來是to where 因為按照where = to which 的邏輯
03/16 16:54, 9F
→
03/16 16:55, , 10F
真的要有也應該是 to what are you going?
03/16 16:55, 10F
→
03/16 16:55, , 11F
where這個字本身就已經包含了to的意義在內
03/16 16:55, 11F
→
03/16 16:57, , 12F
where = in which
03/16 16:57, 12F
→
03/16 19:14, , 13F
這樣記吧: Where are you going? I'm going nowhere.
03/16 19:14, 13F
→
03/16 19:16, , 14F
Where are you going一定要to的話
03/16 19:16, 14F
→
03/16 19:16, , 15F
可以改成To which place are you going?
03/16 19:16, 15F
→
03/16 19:16, , 16F
但這是為了解釋文法的改法，我相信正常不會有人這樣說
03/16 19:16, 16F
→
03/16 19:17, , 17F
因為明明where就可以講完，不需要說to which place..
03/16 19:17, 17F
→
03/18 12:27, , 18F
謝謝大家
03/18 12:27, 18F
‣ 更多 hoohoohoo 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1DW5JRC8 (Eng-Class)