[考題] 很難的克漏字

看板Eng-Class作者 (布瓜)時間15年前 (2010/09/24 19:51), 編輯推噓1(107)
留言8則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/1
考題:一般 題目:Do oysters have little bivalve souls? Do they dream briny dreams, scream briny screams? On a level that I suppose is selfish and somewhat silly, I hope not, because they are alive when they are shucked right 31 us, their deaths more proximal than those of so many creatures we eat. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 試譯: 它們的死亡比起許多其他我們吃的生物都還要歷歷在目 They don't thrash like the lobster in its scalding pot, but should we nonetheless worry about how they meet their end? And whether that end is a sufficiently compassionate one? These questions seem 32 they once did. Last month Whole Foods, a chain of grocery stores that promotes organic and natural foods, announced that it would 33 live lobsters, saying that keeping them in crammed tanks for long periods doesn't demonstrate a proper concern for animal welfare. The Chicago City Council recently 34 of foie gras to protest the force-feeding of the ducks and geese that yield it. California passed a similar law, which doesn't 35 until 2012, and other states and cities are considering such measures. 提問: 32. (A) less funny than (B) less challenging than (C) less imaginative than (D) less ridiculous than Ans:(D) 因為看不太懂這一題的前後文 所以選不出來 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.250.197.210

09/24 23:02, , 1F
these questions 指的是前面兩個
09/24 23:02, 1F

09/24 23:03, , 2F
1. 我們不用去擔心他們臨死前是怎麼煎熬的嗎?
09/24 23:03, 2F

09/24 23:04, , 3F
2. 他們被烹調的方式(死法)是否已經很仁慈了?
09/24 23:04, 3F

09/24 23:06, , 4F
這兩個問題一旦這些oysters 經歷過後,就再也不那麼滑稽
09/24 23:06, 4F

09/24 23:07, , 5F
可笑了。況且後面也舉例說有店家站出來說我們對待他們的
09/24 23:07, 5F

09/24 23:08, , 6F
保存方式很不人道,所以選(D)是比較呼應前後文。
09/24 23:08, 6F

09/24 23:08, , 7F
不選(A)是因為funny是 「用來取悅人的」 (D)則是「引
09/24 23:08, 7F

09/24 23:09, , 8F
來嘲笑的」,兩者的意涵不同。B、C的意思就又差更大了
09/24 23:09, 8F
文章代碼(AID): #1Cd92_gm (Eng-Class)