[閒聊] 大家也不要太氣楊領隊啦
知道這發展方向大家都是很傻眼且不能接受的,
可是冷靜下來想其實也是情有可原,
畢竟我們跟LM不大一樣,
中信集團的業務範圍蠻大的,
也比較吃和公家機關間的關係這一塊~
就球團、領隊來講,和政府間關係是不希望被影響的,因為那大概是球團、領隊所無法承
受的重大壓力。
最後,還是希望體育署能夠好好處理WBC的事,別讓球團和球員難為。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.72.139.3
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Elephants/M.1475393322.A.893.html
推
10/02 15:29, , 1F
10/02 15:29, 1F
→
10/02 15:30, , 2F
10/02 15:30, 2F
也只能期待他們啦
※ 編輯: tony900735 (42.72.139.3), 10/02/2016 15:30:54
推
10/02 15:30, , 3F
10/02 15:30, 3F
推
10/02 15:31, , 4F
10/02 15:31, 4F
推
10/02 15:31, , 5F
10/02 15:31, 5F
→
10/02 15:31, , 6F
10/02 15:31, 6F
推
10/02 15:31, , 7F
10/02 15:31, 7F
推
10/02 15:32, , 8F
10/02 15:32, 8F
噓
10/02 15:32, , 9F
10/02 15:32, 9F
推
10/02 15:32, , 10F
10/02 15:32, 10F
推
10/02 15:32, , 11F
10/02 15:32, 11F
推
10/02 15:32, , 12F
10/02 15:32, 12F
→
10/02 15:32, , 13F
10/02 15:32, 13F
→
10/02 15:33, , 14F
10/02 15:33, 14F
噓
10/02 15:33, , 15F
10/02 15:33, 15F
QQ,不要阿~~
推
10/02 15:33, , 16F
10/02 15:33, 16F
藍莓派大,除此也沒辦法了阿...
※ 編輯: tony900735 (42.72.139.3), 10/02/2016 15:36:09
→
10/02 15:33, , 17F
10/02 15:33, 17F
噓
10/02 15:34, , 18F
10/02 15:34, 18F
噓
10/02 15:34, , 19F
10/02 15:34, 19F
→
10/02 15:34, , 20F
10/02 15:34, 20F
如果工會能出來是最棒了
→
10/02 15:35, , 21F
10/02 15:35, 21F
推
10/02 15:36, , 22F
10/02 15:36, 22F
唉~體育署...
※ 編輯: tony900735 (42.72.139.3), 10/02/2016 15:37:56
推
10/02 15:37, , 23F
10/02 15:37, 23F
推
10/02 15:37, , 24F
10/02 15:37, 24F
噓
10/02 15:37, , 25F
10/02 15:37, 25F
→
10/02 15:38, , 26F
10/02 15:38, 26F
推
10/02 15:38, , 27F
10/02 15:38, 27F
還好自家開人壽的
噓
10/02 15:39, , 28F
10/02 15:39, 28F
幫領隊QQ,這事件當中每一方影響力幾乎都比他大...
※ 編輯: tony900735 (42.72.139.3), 10/02/2016 15:40:27
推
10/02 15:41, , 29F
10/02 15:41, 29F
中信和政府往來規模遠比達達大很多,中信高層歷來不太會跟政府開槓
推
10/02 15:41, , 30F
10/02 15:41, 30F
推
10/02 15:42, , 31F
10/02 15:42, 31F
※ 編輯: tony900735 (42.72.139.3), 10/02/2016 15:45:30
→
10/02 15:42, , 32F
10/02 15:42, 32F
→
10/02 15:43, , 33F
10/02 15:43, 33F
→
10/02 15:43, , 34F
10/02 15:43, 34F
推
10/02 15:43, , 35F
10/02 15:43, 35F
→
10/02 15:43, , 36F
10/02 15:43, 36F
推
10/02 15:43, , 37F
10/02 15:43, 37F
→
10/02 15:43, , 38F
10/02 15:43, 38F
→
10/02 15:44, , 39F
10/02 15:44, 39F
別生氣 別生氣
推
10/02 15:44, , 40F
10/02 15:44, 40F
→
10/02 15:44, , 41F
10/02 15:44, 41F
→
10/02 15:45, , 42F
10/02 15:45, 42F
不會啦,球團我想是很注重球員投資的
→
10/02 15:45, , 43F
10/02 15:45, 43F
唉,台灣各協會...
推
10/02 15:45, , 44F
10/02 15:45, 44F
※ 編輯: tony900735 (42.72.139.3), 10/02/2016 15:48:52
推
10/02 15:46, , 45F
10/02 15:46, 45F
→
10/02 15:46, , 46F
10/02 15:46, 46F
推
10/02 15:47, , 47F
10/02 15:47, 47F
噓
10/02 15:49, , 48F
10/02 15:49, 48F
沒辦法,體育署跳下來選邊了,幫領隊QQ
※ 編輯: tony900735 (42.72.139.3), 10/02/2016 15:52:09
噓
10/02 15:50, , 49F
10/02 15:50, 49F
推
10/02 15:50, , 50F
10/02 15:50, 50F
推
10/02 15:51, , 51F
10/02 15:51, 51F
推
10/02 15:55, , 52F
10/02 15:55, 52F
→
10/02 15:56, , 53F
10/02 15:56, 53F
推
10/02 15:59, , 54F
10/02 15:59, 54F
推
10/02 15:59, , 55F
10/02 15:59, 55F
推
10/02 16:05, , 56F
10/02 16:05, 56F
推
10/02 16:09, , 57F
10/02 16:09, 57F
→
10/02 16:09, , 58F
10/02 16:09, 58F
→
10/02 16:25, , 59F
10/02 16:25, 59F
推
10/02 16:27, , 60F
10/02 16:27, 60F
推
10/02 16:28, , 61F
10/02 16:28, 61F
噓
10/02 16:39, , 62F
10/02 16:39, 62F
噓
10/02 16:39, , 63F
10/02 16:39, 63F
推
10/02 16:42, , 64F
10/02 16:42, 64F
→
10/02 16:52, , 65F
10/02 16:52, 65F
噓
10/02 16:57, , 66F
10/02 16:57, 66F
噓
10/02 16:59, , 67F
10/02 16:59, 67F
→
10/02 16:59, , 68F
10/02 16:59, 68F
推
10/02 17:38, , 69F
10/02 17:38, 69F
噓
10/02 17:39, , 70F
10/02 17:39, 70F
基本上我是想說就球團立場而言,一定不與政府(體育署)反調,畢竟母企業發展很靠政府
...在這狀況下只能期待體育署了
推
10/02 17:54, , 71F
10/02 17:54, 71F
→
10/02 17:54, , 72F
10/02 17:54, 72F
※ 編輯: tony900735 (42.72.139.3), 10/02/2016 21:36:42