[新聞] 恐龍是被溫室效應凍死的(?)

看板EarthScience作者 (融)時間15年前 (2010/04/26 03:28), 編輯推噓11(11022)
留言33則, 10人參與, 最新討論串1/1
恐龍是被溫室效應凍死的 2010.04.25 中廣新聞 http://news.chinatimes.com/world/0,5246,50403393x132010042500697,00.html 英國研究人員說,恐龍不是被隕石害死的,而是被溫室效應導致的海水降溫凍死的。 普里矛斯大學研究人員研究了挪威北極圈的恐龍化石以後認定,一億三千七百萬年以 前,地球的二氧化碳大量增加,氣溫升高,北極圈的冰層融化,冰水往南流,海水溫 度一下子降了攝氏九度。恐龍是冷血動物需要環境的溫度讓他們保持體溫。海水溫度 驟降凍死了許多恐龍。 以往科學家認為,恐龍是因為六千五百萬年前,一次巨大的變動而滅絕的。一般認為 地球這次大變動是遭到隕石襲擊而一下子絕種的。但是負責這項研究的普萊斯說,恐 龍應該是因為海水降溫慢慢被凍死的。 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 外電原文:http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/pages/view.asp?page=29944 Scientists identify freezing times for Cretaceous dinosaurs 2010.04.15 University of Plymouth Summary Scientists studying fossils and minerals from Arctic Svalbard, in Norway, have discovered evidence that the ‘greenhouse’ climate of the Cretaceous period was punctuated by a sudden drop in global temperatures. Further detail The drop is estimated to have occurred some 137 million years ago during a time when dinosaurs roamed the Earth, and would have seen the islands fall from an average of 13 degrees centigrade (ocean temperature) to as low as four degrees. The findings, which were published in the journal Geology and featured as a highlight in Nature Geoscience, will further contribute to the debate over climate change as they appear to contradict the common model which links high levels of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) – as recorded in the Cretaceous era – with reduced polar ice caps. Despite being located in the Arctic Circle, Svalbard was home to numerous species of dinosaur and was typically characterised by warm, shallow seas and swamps. But the research team, led by Dr Gregory Price of the University of Plymouth, found evidence in fossils and carbonate materials preserved in marine rocks in the region of a transient shift to cooler glacial conditions around 137 million years ago. Dr Price said: "At certain times in the geological past, the world has been dominated by greenhouse conditions with elevated CO2 levels and warm Polar Regions, and hence, these are seen as analogues of future global climate. “But this research suggests that for short periods of time the Earth plunged back to colder temperatures, which not only poses interesting questions in terms of how the dinosaurs might have coped, but also over the nature of climate change itself.” Dr Price, along with Dr Elizabeth Nunn, of Johannes Gutenburg Universitat in Mainz, Germany, first visited Svalbard in 2005 to collect fossils and samples, in an area famed for a number of paleontological discoveries, including giant marine reptiles such as pliosaurs and icthyosaurs. The samples were analysed back in Plymouth and prompted return trips to the area to gather more evidence. “The flourishing of the dinosaurs and a range of other data indicates that the Cretaceous period was considerably warmer and boasted a high degree of CO2 in the atmosphere,” said Dr Price. “But over a period of a few hundred or a few thousand years, ocean temperatures fell from an average of 13 degrees centigrade to between eight and four degrees. “Although a short episode of cool polar conditions is potentially at odds with a high CO2 world, our data demonstrates the variability of climate over long timescales.” ENDS -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.194.194.153

04/26 08:05, , 1F
那二氧化碳大增是什麼事件導致的? 隕石擊中地球...= =
04/26 08:05, 1F

04/26 08:12, , 2F
那次大滅絕主因已明確指出是小行星撞擊,連隕石坑都找到了
04/26 08:12, 2F

04/26 08:15, , 3F
如果是單純氣溫變冷的話,生物可以靠遷徙至熱帶來應對
04/26 08:15, 3F

04/26 08:15, , 4F
雖然說還是會造成很多物種滅絕,但是不會是大規模全面性
04/26 08:15, 4F

04/26 08:19, , 5F
應該說科學家找到很多可能造成生物滅絕的原因,但最開始
04/26 08:19, 5F

04/26 08:20, , 6F
引起這一連串事件的原因是什麼? 是隕石撞擊那就確定為主因
04/26 08:20, 6F

04/26 08:20, , 7F
記者是白X嗎 看完原文再來看報導真的快昏倒
04/26 08:20, 7F

04/26 08:27, , 8F
看了好幾遍還是看不出來原文有表達出跟報導接近的意思..
04/26 08:27, 8F

04/26 08:28, , 9F
原因只是在討論海水溫度急降及CO2濃度的關係
04/26 08:28, 9F

04/26 08:29, , 10F
原"文"只是在討論海水溫度急降及CO2濃度的關係 (修正)
04/26 08:29, 10F

04/26 08:30, , 11F
CO2及甲烷的對於氣候的嚴重影響也可見於二疊─三疊紀滅絕
04/26 08:30, 11F

04/26 08:31, , 12F
事件 但那次的滅絕進行時間很長 但也很全面
04/26 08:31, 12F

04/26 08:33, , 13F
而且包含海洋大型爬蟲類---->>這根本不是恐龍啊....
04/26 08:33, 13F

04/26 08:33, , 14F
還恐龍是冷血動物所以被凍死 挖靠這個也掰太大了吧....
04/26 08:33, 14F

04/26 08:36, , 15F
記者知道恥字怎麼寫嗎 還冒充研究人員說話 都他在講...
04/26 08:36, 15F

04/26 11:00, , 16F
每隔一段時間就出現恐龍的另一種死法,科學也不要盡信 XD
04/26 11:00, 16F

04/26 11:12, , 17F
重點在於台灣媒體在翻譯科普新聞時 只會粗略將外國新聞
04/26 11:12, 17F

04/26 11:13, , 18F
翻譯 而不會去理解該新聞 研究的實際內容
04/26 11:13, 18F

04/26 11:13, , 19F
而媒體也多半沒有科普知識
04/26 11:13, 19F

04/26 11:15, , 20F
我甚至看過中國媒體在翻譯恐龍新聞時 製造一大段原文
04/26 11:15, 20F

04/26 11:15, , 21F
研究裡沒有的內容
04/26 11:15, 21F

04/26 11:18, , 22F
與其說科學不能盡信 不如果媒體不能盡信 直接看研究就知
04/26 11:18, 22F

04/26 11:20, , 23F
04/26 11:20, 23F

04/26 11:54, , 24F
不用說中國媒體 這篇就是台灣媒體也是這樣搞啊
04/26 11:54, 24F

04/26 12:50, , 25F
有的時候就是某個研究人員的PAPER 大家都看很多了
04/26 12:50, 25F

04/26 12:51, , 26F
內容是不是一定都對 加上媒體喜歡挑聳動的報 自己判斷吧
04/26 12:51, 26F

04/26 12:51, , 27F
問題是原文內容根本不是這樣......
04/26 12:51, 27F

04/26 14:16, , 28F
所以在貼新聞時 特地去把原文挖出來一起貼 :P
04/26 14:16, 28F

04/26 15:10, , 29F
他不是記者,是編譯,九成以上外電都是編譯處理,請勿罵錯人
04/26 15:10, 29F

04/27 00:16, , 30F
這...誰跟你說恐龍是變溫動物了
04/27 00:16, 30F

04/27 00:19, , 31F
1.從爬蟲類看恐龍->變溫動物 2.從鳥類看->恆溫動物
04/27 00:19, 31F

04/27 00:20, , 32F
兩個假說至今仍未有個定論 這個編譯有夠厲害
04/27 00:20, 32F

04/27 10:54, , 33F
關鍵字:英國研究、台灣媒體
04/27 10:54, 33F
文章代碼(AID): #1Br9VLuW (EarthScience)