[問題] Canon定焦鏡選擇消失
嗨大家好~小弟目前用的是Canon 16~35f4L/50mmf1.8STM,最近想再入手一顆二手定焦
,預算大概一萬左右~可是在焦段選擇上就有困難了…
我目前主要是拍室外景、人像加上偶爾拍系上活動~目前是在(35.50.85.新百微上選擇
)
35:在1635上面就有了
50:又跟現在50mmf1.8重疊(這顆對我來說算…還可以接受)
85:人像鏡,但是怕太長
100:覺得微距很好用不過怕真正實用性不高(怕太長~
個人目前是傾向出掉50mmf1.8STM(或是留著當玩具xD),購入 C50mmf1.4或是S50mmf1.
4非art版,不知道板上各位大大有甚麼看法
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.197.0
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DSLR/M.1510965925.A.907.html
※ 編輯: leochen0410 (114.136.197.0), 11/18/2017 08:47:48
※ 編輯: leochen0410 (114.136.197.0), 11/18/2017 08:48:13
→
11/18 09:04, , 1F
11/18 09:04, 1F
推
11/18 09:05, , 2F
11/18 09:05, 2F
推
11/18 10:00, , 3F
11/18 10:00, 3F
百微真的很吸引我QQ
推
11/18 10:05, , 4F
11/18 10:05, 4F
我比較常拍室內,真的有時候沒有地方退~而且已經有閃燈了謝謝你
推
11/18 10:12, , 5F
11/18 10:12, 5F
推
11/18 10:41, , 6F
11/18 10:41, 6F
→
11/18 10:42, , 7F
11/18 10:42, 7F
好的!謝謝你~我先去借一顆來用用~
→
11/18 10:53, , 8F
11/18 10:53, 8F
真的…評估自己需要的真的比較重要
推
11/18 11:02, , 9F
11/18 11:02, 9F
感謝大家建議,小弟就不一一回覆了~評估後那就入手85f1.8了,感覺二手cp值也蠻高的~
推
11/18 11:23, , 10F
11/18 11:23, 10F
推
11/18 11:32, , 11F
11/18 11:32, 11F
我是用6D~應該會買85了~
→
11/18 14:22, , 12F
11/18 14:22, 12F
好的謝謝您
推
11/18 14:27, , 13F
11/18 14:27, 13F
→
11/18 14:28, , 14F
11/18 14:28, 14F
這樣會不會室內太不好用呢?~
※ 編輯: leochen0410 (223.136.233.119), 11/18/2017 16:06:29
推
11/18 16:33, , 15F
11/18 16:33, 15F
→
11/18 16:33, , 16F
11/18 16:33, 16F
推
11/18 16:35, , 17F
11/18 16:35, 17F
謝謝你xD不過我應該買原廠
推
11/18 19:26, , 18F
11/18 19:26, 18F
推
11/18 19:30, , 19F
11/18 19:30, 19F
→
11/18 19:31, , 20F
11/18 19:31, 20F
推
11/18 21:37, , 21F
11/18 21:37, 21F
→
11/18 21:37, , 22F
11/18 21:37, 22F
推
11/18 21:40, , 23F
11/18 21:40, 23F
50f1.4跟50f1.8哪個cp值比較高呢
推
11/18 22:15, , 24F
11/18 22:15, 24F
→
11/18 22:15, , 25F
11/18 22:15, 25F
→
11/18 22:15, , 26F
11/18 22:15, 26F
謝謝詳細解說!
推
11/18 23:06, , 27F
11/18 23:06, 27F
→
11/18 23:07, , 28F
11/18 23:07, 28F
推
11/18 23:09, , 29F
11/18 23:09, 29F
推
11/18 23:11, , 30F
11/18 23:11, 30F
我好像知道你~是謝大嗎哈哈哈~感謝回覆
※ 編輯: leochen0410 (223.136.233.119), 11/18/2017 23:29:02
→
11/18 23:28, , 31F
11/18 23:28, 31F
→
11/18 23:28, , 32F
11/18 23:28, 32F
推
11/18 23:57, , 33F
11/18 23:57, 33F
→
11/18 23:57, , 34F
11/18 23:57, 34F
→
11/18 23:57, , 35F
11/18 23:57, 35F
→
11/18 23:57, , 36F
11/18 23:57, 36F
推
11/19 00:41, , 37F
11/19 00:41, 37F
→
11/19 00:42, , 38F
11/19 00:42, 38F
以上大大:那是不是sigma好很多QQ
→
11/19 01:00, , 39F
11/19 01:00, 39F
推
11/19 02:33, , 40F
11/19 02:33, 40F
→
11/19 02:43, , 41F
11/19 02:43, 41F
135我用過,覺得對我可用性太低應該覺得是85了謝謝你們
※ 編輯: leochen0410 (111.71.6.187), 11/19/2017 10:12:33
推
11/19 10:13, , 42F
11/19 10:13, 42F
推
11/19 14:31, , 43F
11/19 14:31, 43F
推
11/19 21:26, , 44F
11/19 21:26, 44F
→
11/19 21:27, , 45F
11/19 21:27, 45F
→
11/19 21:29, , 46F
11/19 21:29, 46F
推
11/19 21:31, , 47F
11/19 21:31, 47F
推
11/19 21:33, , 48F
11/19 21:33, 48F
推
11/20 00:53, , 49F
11/20 00:53, 49F
→
11/20 01:29, , 50F
11/20 01:29, 50F
推
11/20 17:33, , 51F
11/20 17:33, 51F
→
11/21 06:55, , 52F
11/21 06:55, 52F
推
11/21 06:58, , 53F
11/21 06:58, 53F