[情報] a9的DXO分數
總分92分
Color Depth 24.9 bits
Dynamic Range 13.3 EV
ISO 3517
跟a7II, a7RII比較
https://tinyurl.com/yb7tat72
低ISO時的動態範圍是被犧牲的
http://imgur.com/a/tcg7S
不過高ISO的訊雜比跟a7RII一樣優異
http://imgur.com/a/kbRoL
跟D5, 1DXII比較
https://tinyurl.com/y8wcdcoq
比較訝異的是之前看網路比較好像是D5比較好,但DXO的量測並非如此
http://imgur.com/a/pC9dD
另外,在動態範圍方面並沒有比1DXII強
http://imgur.com/a/TZyfL
DXO目前a9還沒搭配其他鏡頭進行量測
結論:基本上DXO對a9相當的肯定,
不過也點出對於已在Canon/Nikon系統下投資重金的職業用戶要換系統會相當的昂貴。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.177.13.136
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DSLR/M.1497571219.A.D34.html
推
06/16 08:21, , 1F
06/16 08:21, 1F
推
06/16 08:36, , 2F
06/16 08:36, 2F
推
06/16 08:38, , 3F
06/16 08:38, 3F
→
06/16 08:38, , 4F
06/16 08:38, 4F
推
06/16 08:44, , 5F
06/16 08:44, 5F
推
06/16 08:50, , 6F
06/16 08:50, 6F
→
06/16 08:50, , 7F
06/16 08:50, 7F
我以為動態範圍好像不一定跟感光元件大小成比例
推
06/16 08:55, , 8F
06/16 08:55, 8F
推
06/16 09:50, , 9F
06/16 09:50, 9F
→
06/16 09:50, , 10F
06/16 09:50, 10F
推
06/16 10:19, , 11F
06/16 10:19, 11F
推
06/16 12:32, , 12F
06/16 12:32, 12F
推
06/16 12:42, , 13F
06/16 12:42, 13F
→
06/16 12:42, , 14F
06/16 12:42, 14F
推
06/16 13:37, , 15F
06/16 13:37, 15F
※ 編輯: ferrinatice (180.177.13.136), 06/16/2017 15:21:27
推
06/16 18:36, , 16F
06/16 18:36, 16F
噓
06/17 00:26, , 17F
06/17 00:26, 17F
推
06/17 00:29, , 18F
06/17 00:29, 18F
推
06/17 00:44, , 19F
06/17 00:44, 19F
推
06/17 00:51, , 20F
06/17 00:51, 20F
推
06/18 06:15, , 21F
06/18 06:15, 21F