[閒聊] Sony A6000 對DSLR市場的影響
最近看到A6000的機身性能實測
除了快速的對焦外,可用的ISO似乎也是APSC中數一數二的
看過版上有篇Nikon D7100 與A6000的討論
似乎除了鏡頭群和電池續航力外,
找不到什麼理由不選A6000,
何況A6000的價錢定位感覺是入門機呀!
這樣的CP值很高呀!
小弟最近本打算入手70D+sigma17-50
但看到Sony最近A7和A6000這樣的發展趨勢
未來一但鏡頭支援度提升後
感覺中低階的DSLR市場會快速萎縮
C/N兩大廠應該很快就會跟進這樣的策略吧
不知到板友們怎想,
若是70D或D7100和A6000同樣便宜
你還會選70D嗎
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.129.16.167
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DSLR/M.1396971298.A.FEC.html
推
04/08 23:35, , 1F
04/08 23:35, 1F
我是覺得C/N兩家一定很快就會生出個APSC的EVIL機來應戰了
屆時中低階DSLR是不是要走入歷史了?
現在若有鏡頭包袱又不急著換相機的人,也許可以再等等看C/N兩家的大片幅微單
→
04/08 23:40, , 2F
04/08 23:40, 2F
→
04/08 23:40, , 3F
04/08 23:40, 3F
→
04/08 23:41, , 4F
04/08 23:41, 4F
推
04/08 23:41, , 5F
04/08 23:41, 5F
→
04/08 23:41, , 6F
04/08 23:41, 6F
這樣想也有道理,倘若C/N家出台APSC的EVIL機,品牌情節重的人是不是就買單了,
然後像D7100/70D或700D這種大體積的中低階機身就會漸漸消失了?
→
04/08 23:43, , 7F
04/08 23:43, 7F
噓
04/08 23:44, , 8F
04/08 23:44, 8F
→
04/08 23:44, , 9F
04/08 23:44, 9F
→
04/08 23:45, , 10F
04/08 23:45, 10F
→
04/08 23:45, , 11F
04/08 23:45, 11F
噓
04/08 23:47, , 12F
04/08 23:47, 12F
這的確是我忽略了 Sorry
但EOSM的對焦速度太慢,大部分人應該挺在意的吧?
反觀現在Sony都有辦法把機身性能提升到和DSLR一樣(不知道操作性會差很多嗎?)
我還是想問,若無鏡頭包袱,有什麼理由選限階段的APSC-DSLR
我想到的就是觸控螢幕、續航力、錄影對焦性能
除此還有嗎?
→
04/08 23:49, , 13F
04/08 23:49, 13F
推
04/08 23:49, , 14F
04/08 23:49, 14F
→
04/08 23:49, , 15F
04/08 23:49, 15F
→
04/08 23:50, , 16F
04/08 23:50, 16F
→
04/08 23:52, , 17F
04/08 23:52, 17F
→
04/08 23:53, , 18F
04/08 23:53, 18F
→
04/08 23:56, , 19F
04/08 23:56, 19F
→
04/08 23:57, , 20F
04/08 23:57, 20F
※ 編輯: FXOLeenock (220.129.16.167), 04/09/2014 00:09:14
推
04/08 23:59, , 21F
04/08 23:59, 21F
→
04/09 00:00, , 22F
04/09 00:00, 22F
推
04/09 00:02, , 23F
04/09 00:02, 23F
→
04/09 00:03, , 24F
04/09 00:03, 24F
→
04/09 00:09, , 25F
04/09 00:09, 25F
※ 編輯: FXOLeenock (220.129.16.167), 04/09/2014 00:10:03
→
04/09 00:10, , 26F
04/09 00:10, 26F
→
04/09 00:14, , 27F
04/09 00:14, 27F
同意,但我產生另一個疑問是:EOSM能轉接EF-S鏡群,鏡頭應該就不是主因了
若下一代對焦性能和A6000一樣甚至更好,這樣還要選DSLR的原因是什麼?
→
04/09 00:15, , 28F
04/09 00:15, 28F
※ 編輯: FXOLeenock (220.129.16.167), 04/09/2014 00:26:31
→
04/09 00:17, , 29F
04/09 00:17, 29F
→
04/09 00:17, , 30F
04/09 00:17, 30F
→
04/09 00:17, , 31F
04/09 00:17, 31F
推
04/09 00:19, , 32F
04/09 00:19, 32F
→
04/09 00:19, , 33F
04/09 00:19, 33F
→
04/09 00:22, , 34F
04/09 00:22, 34F
推
04/09 00:23, , 35F
04/09 00:23, 35F
→
04/09 00:23, , 36F
04/09 00:23, 36F
→
04/09 00:26, , 37F
04/09 00:26, 37F
推
04/09 00:26, , 38F
04/09 00:26, 38F
→
04/09 00:27, , 39F
04/09 00:27, 39F
→
04/09 00:27, , 40F
04/09 00:27, 40F
推
04/09 00:28, , 41F
04/09 00:28, 41F
→
04/09 00:28, , 42F
04/09 00:28, 42F
→
04/09 00:28, , 43F
04/09 00:28, 43F
→
04/09 00:30, , 44F
04/09 00:30, 44F
→
04/09 00:30, , 45F
04/09 00:30, 45F
→
04/09 00:35, , 46F
04/09 00:35, 46F
推
04/09 00:42, , 47F
04/09 00:42, 47F
推
04/09 00:59, , 48F
04/09 00:59, 48F
→
04/09 01:00, , 49F
04/09 01:00, 49F
→
04/09 01:08, , 50F
04/09 01:08, 50F
→
04/09 01:13, , 51F
04/09 01:13, 51F
→
04/09 01:14, , 52F
04/09 01:14, 52F
推
04/09 01:36, , 53F
04/09 01:36, 53F
→
04/09 01:43, , 54F
04/09 01:43, 54F
→
04/09 01:44, , 55F
04/09 01:44, 55F
→
04/09 01:45, , 56F
04/09 01:45, 56F
→
04/09 02:51, , 57F
04/09 02:51, 57F
→
04/09 02:52, , 58F
04/09 02:52, 58F
推
04/09 09:44, , 59F
04/09 09:44, 59F
→
04/09 09:44, , 60F
04/09 09:44, 60F
→
04/09 09:47, , 61F
04/09 09:47, 61F
→
04/09 09:48, , 62F
04/09 09:48, 62F
→
04/09 09:51, , 63F
04/09 09:51, 63F
→
04/09 14:23, , 64F
04/09 14:23, 64F
推
04/09 14:30, , 65F
04/09 14:30, 65F
推
04/09 14:34, , 66F
04/09 14:34, 66F
→
04/09 16:30, , 67F
04/09 16:30, 67F
推
04/09 20:30, , 68F
04/09 20:30, 68F
→
04/09 20:31, , 69F
04/09 20:31, 69F
推
04/10 06:29, , 70F
04/10 06:29, 70F
→
04/10 06:30, , 71F
04/10 06:30, 71F
→
04/10 06:31, , 72F
04/10 06:31, 72F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 24 篇):