Re: NTPD synchronisation patches

看板DFBSD_submit作者時間20年前 (2005/04/14 17:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串9/19 (看更多)
-On [20050414 08:52], Joerg Sonnenberger (joerg@britannica.bec.de) wrote: >Which keeps the question why the initial correction did not happen. >You have been using -s? Did it report any error? As we discussed on IRC, no it did not report any error. To be honest, I watched the offset only increase over the time I had ntpd -sd running. As soon as I had run ntpdate and started ntpd again with -sd the offsets were +/- 0.000xx values. Oh by the way, ntpd does not like, if it is running, that ntpdate sets the clock. A bug? ntpd totally stopped synching after I did a one time sync with ntpdate while ntpd was running. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono Free Tibet! http://www.savetibet.org/ | http://ashemedai.deviantart.com/ http://www.tendra.org/ | http://www.in-nomine.org/ The taller the bamboo grows, the lower it bends. - Chinese saying
文章代碼(AID): #12NZYT00 (DFBSD_submit)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #12NZYT00 (DFBSD_submit)