討論串(共8篇) - callout patch - make callouts per-cpu and MP safe. - 看板DFBSD_kernel

看板 [ DFBSD_kernel ]

討論串callout patch - make callouts per-cpu and MP safe.

共 8 篇文章

排序：最新先 | 最舊先 | 留言數 | 推文總分

內容預覽：開啟 | 關閉 | 只限未讀

首頁

尾頁

Re: callout patch - make callouts per-cpu and MP safe.

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者dillon.時間21年前 (2004/09/15 05:02)資訊

內容預覽:

I do not want to add another API to the timeout code until we remove one. of the two API's we already have (i.e. remove timeout() & untimeout()).. I r

Re: callout patch - make callouts per-cpu and MP safe.

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者joerg.時間21年前 (2004/09/15 05:02)資訊

內容預覽:

Patch is at http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~joerg/changes_vs_matt.diff. Just apply it after Matt's changes to i386/i386/machdep.c, kern/kern_clock.c,ker

(還有94個字)

Re: callout patch - make callouts per-cpu and MP safe.

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者joerg.時間21年前 (2004/09/15 02:32)資訊

內容預覽:

On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 10:28:46AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:. > I like the OpenBSD method better (as you describe it), but it would. > be a conside

(還有506個字)

Re: callout patch - make callouts per-cpu and MP safe.

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者dillon.時間21年前 (2004/09/15 02:05)資訊

內容預覽:

Well, callout_reset() is the only way to start a new timeout using. the 'new' API in FreeBSD/DragonFly.. I like the OpenBSD method better (as you desc

(還有233個字)

Re: callout patch - make callouts per-cpu and MP safe.

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者joerg.時間21年前 (2004/09/15 02:05)資訊

內容預覽:

On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 09:39:11AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:. >. > :On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:53:13PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:. > :> This patc

(還有1487個字)

首頁

尾頁