Re: Blogbench RAID benchmarks

看板DFBSD_kernel作者時間14年前 (2011/07/19 09:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串13/23 (看更多)
:I've done a new set of tests on FreeBSD 8.2 and DragonFly 2.10. :kern.physmem was set to 4GB and I used 150 iterations just to be sure. : :Someone sent me instructions on how to enable the AHCI driver on FreeBSD, so :we will get a less meaningless comparison for the single SATA drive case. : :This time, DragonFly wasn't CPU bound during the tests, but the results :have not changed so much. : :FreeBSD write performance scales with the disk subsystem and read performance :goes in the other direction. : :DragonFly doesn't scale; there's a bit of variation for reads but the write :curve is perfectly flat. : : :On DragonFly, most of the blogbench threads were in 'hmrrcm' or 'vnode' :states. :I also got a few kernel messages like these: This is looking more real. DragonFly is clearly prioritizing reads over writes which is preventing writes from flushing very quickly, while FreeBSD is prioritizing writes over reads which is preventing reads from getting through. In the post-cache-blowout portion of the test (past blog ~600 or so) FreeBSD's read activity drops into the ~800 range while DragonFly's read activity stabilizes in the ~25000 range. At the same time FreeBSD is maintaining a high write rate in ~5000 range while DragonFly's write rate drops to extremely low levels (~30 range). However, the data set size is going to be extremely different between the two due to the low write numbers for DragonFly, so even the read numbers can't be fairly compared. What we are seeing here is a case where both operating systems are producing very unbalanced results. The 'final score' for blogbench is extremely misleading. Neither result is desireable. In FreeBSD's case the read performance drops way too low and in DragonFly's case the write performance drops way too low. How is the RAID volume formatted? DragonFly should be showing improved performance on reads going to 4-disk raid. The stripe size needs to be fairly large, like ~1MB or so. I will experiment a bit with a one and two-disk stripe to see if I can figure out what is going on with the write activity. I've never seen writes that low on prior tests (though reads look reasonable to me). -Matt
文章代碼(AID): #1E9DTIfN (DFBSD_kernel)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1E9DTIfN (DFBSD_kernel)