Re: Time to let go of ipfilter
From what I have seen of NPF and how it is more in-line with some of
DF's MP goals and is very neatly written for MP, I would say it would
make a worthy PF successor.
Yep, we have too many solutions for too small a team to maintain.
-Ed.
On 22 January 2011 11:09, <elekktretterr@exemail.com.au> wrote:
> In my opinion, there should be only one packet filter/firewall in the
> kernel, with multiple clients - PF client, IPFW client, ipfilter client.
> People could write their own clients, and wouldn't have to touch the
> kernel at all.
>
> Petr
>
>
>
--
--
Edward O'Callaghan
http://www.auroraux.org/
eocallaghan at auroraux dot org
---
()ꀠascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠꀠ- against microsoft attachments
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 23 篇)：