Re: DragonFly-2.3.1.165.g25822 master sys/dev/disk/ahci Makefile

看板DFBSD_kernel作者時間16年前 (2009/06/05 03:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Note that the AHCI driver is *NOT* yet ready for prime time. I still have at least a week's worth of programming and another week of testing to do. This commit gets the basics working, including AHCI's NCQ, but state changes on the AHCI ports are not handled very well yet, let alone bus scan/rescan interactions with CAM. ATAPI is not hooked up yet either. There are some device issues, at least with my 'MyBook' ESATA, but those may be due to the book's idiotic ESATA firmware. OpenBSD's code is very well written but even so I've had to make some major modifications to it to hook it into DragonFly. I had to rewire the SCSI logic since we have CAM and we do not have the OpenBSD scsi-ata layer (and I don't want to port it), and I had to rewire the BUSDMA model. I also bumped up the number of PRDT DMA entries from 24 to 56 to support our 128K MAXPHYS. I am also doing some major extensions on top of the base port. I will be adding hot-plug support and port multiplier support. I already have basic hot-swap detection in place but I still have to wire up the re-probe and SCSI bus rescan. -- In terms of testing, the only real way right now is to netboot a system without NATA and then kldload AHCI after you've booted. I will have AHCI prioritized soon so both drivers can be present but I want to get ATAPI working first. In my own testing environment I've been able to kldload/kldunload the AHCI driver many times without crashing the system, so the basic attach/detach is already a lot more robust then NATA. It's nice to not have to reboot the system :-). Netbooting is really the only way to go for testing this driver. I've already done some basic testing and AHCI NCQ is quite nice. The driver has considerably higher performance then NATA but, of course, it isn't really a fair test since NATA doesn't have AHCI NCQ support. I'm quite happy, though. -Matt
文章代碼(AID): #1AA1dn00 (DFBSD_kernel)