Re: Release page review / comments, plus HEADS UP to our mirrors

看板DFBSD_kernel作者時間21年前 (2005/04/09 12:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串8/19 (看更多)
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005, Bill Hacker wrote: [ok, this is off-topic, so this will be hopefully my only reply...] > Matt's MTA seems to be set to block 'allocated portable' source IP's > with no DNS record of their own, i.e. those running an MTA on their > own PC with dial-up, cable, or ADSL. The (static) IPv4 address of my computer is 63.195.85.27 which maps to adsl-63-195-85-27.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net Forward and reverse lookup match; sendmail will not complain about the mapping (BTW: I'm the sendmail maintainer, so I know a bit about MTAs and anti-spam measures... and as I run the next generation of sendmail on my system I won't use some external "smart host".) > Downside is that the 'upstream ISP', in many cases, > has an *abysmal* record and is often in one or several > RBL's - and should be. Last I tested the IP address wasn't in any "well-known" DNSBL. > Matt seems to use 'strict' rDNS lookup. Mainline MTA authors, > (Hazel, Varshavchick, Venema, et al) are more sanguine, You didn't list my name :-) > 'coz rDNS is quite often non-exisistent or incorrectly > configured (most virtual-hosting, for example). See above, this doesn't apply to my system. Anyway, Matt may block whatever he likes, it's his system. Hopefully he won't ask sendmail.org a question however, because he would block my reply... PS: my original mail was a "request" to explain TLS on the release page (to avoid the confusion about those TLAs :-).
文章代碼(AID): #12LrE700 (DFBSD_kernel)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 19 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #12LrE700 (DFBSD_kernel)