Re: rc and smf
Dan Melomedman wrote:
> You don't see the point. It takes a long time to fix the fault. BSD has
> nothing to do with this. The real world does. You don't want a nuclear
> reactor to explode because it took an admin five minutes to notice the
> fault, and restart the service.
Dan,
earning my money by working in refineries and all kinds of other
chemical plants, I can assure you that it is _very_ unlikely that one of
them will explode because of a failed *NIX service. :) You wouldn't get
a permission to start your plant up in the first place if it was
designed to rely on a service being up all the time.
Windows machines and *NIX workstations are used for process
visualization only in these environments. I/O with the field is done by
(usually redundant) modules running well known (i.e. rather old)
software and on top of this you usually have failsafe PLCs (Programmable
Logic Controllers) that override the control system in case of an emergency.
Of course, this might be different in countries like North Korea or so...
Sascha
--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 30 之 53 篇)：