Re: Description of the Journaling topology

看板DFBSD_kernel作者時間21年前 (2004/12/29 15:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串8/42 (看更多)
:... :> support the ultimate goal of single-system-image clustering. The second :> leg is a cache coherency scheme, and the third will be resource sharing :> and migration. All three will have to be very carefully and deliberately :> integrated together into a single whole to achieve the ultimate goal. :> :> This makes journaling a major turning point for the project... one, :> I hope, that attracts more people to DragonFly. : :Is that primarily coders or users? For me I want to switch my servers to :DF but I am kind of waiting for a new release version where only the :bugs and exploits are updating but no more code is introduced. : :I think that overall from what I see on my test server DF is production :ripe but I'm overly paranoid when dealing with productivity machines. : :I'll planned to jump the ship from 4 to DF in July 2005 ( a matter of :backup and reinstalling the OS) do you think there will be new release :by then? : :-- :mph Yes, there will probably be a release in February and probably another one just before USENIX (the USENIX timing seems to garner the most community interest). I understand the issue of release stability and the necessity of branching the tree to achieve that. I'm holding off on that as long as possible because the moment we branch the tree we have to start dealing with two branches instead of one. I know we'll have to do it eventually, and I can certainly think of ways to reduce the burden (i.e. as you say, making the branches bug-fix-only trees instead of tested-stable-feature trees). I definitely have no intention of creating parallel development paths, that would be a disaster waiting to happen. I don't know *when* we will do our first branch, however. -Matt Matthew Dillon <dillon@backplane.com>
文章代碼(AID): #11qbO_00 (DFBSD_kernel)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #11qbO_00 (DFBSD_kernel)