討論串(共7篇) - Ports breakage? - 看板DFBSD_bugs

看板 [ DFBSD_bugs ]

討論串Ports breakage?

共 7 篇文章

排序：最新先 | 最舊先 | 留言數 | 推文總分

內容預覽：開啟 | 關閉 | 只限未讀

首頁

尾頁

Re: Ports breakage?

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者saw.時間21年前 (2004/10/02 08:01)資訊

內容預覽:

Matthew Dillon wrote:. > Yes, I agree, but I don't want to just break ports that were working. > before for no good reason. Since any new code should

(還有77個字)

Re: Ports breakage?

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者dillon.時間21年前 (2004/10/02 07:01)資訊

內容預覽:

Yes, I agree, but I don't want to just break ports that were working. before for no good reason. Since any new code should use the long-form. of the o

Re: Ports breakage?

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者qhwt+dfly.時間21年前 (2004/10/01 17:01)資訊

內容預覽:

On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 11:59:01PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:. >. > :walt,. > :. > :please read the following thread in commits@.. > :. > :http://le

(還有755個字)

Re: Ports breakage?

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者asmodai.時間21年前 (2004/10/01 17:01)資訊

內容預覽:

-On [20041001 09:02], Matthew Dillon (dillon@apollo.backplane.com) wrote:. > Isn't that a mod of a file in the FreeBSD ports? Meaning that we can't> '

(還有734個字)

Re: Ports breakage?

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者dillon.時間21年前 (2004/10/01 15:32)資訊

內容預覽:

Isn't that a mod of a file in the FreeBSD ports? Meaning that we can't. 'fix' it that way.. It might be better to make our new patch conform to the ol

首頁

尾頁