討論串new panic (was: Re: "busy buffer problem" panics)
共 8 篇文章
首頁
上一頁
1
2
下一頁
尾頁

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者dillon.時間21年前 (2004/09/10 05:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
0
內容預覽:
Nah, don't worry about it. I actually think that your original. issue might have been a combination of the procfs AND the linux pathing. code, whereas
(還有748個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者atrens.時間21年前 (2004/09/10 02:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
0
內容預覽:
Hi Matt/All,. Okay, so far so good... with the (properly applied) patch that. Matt posted my system is once again stable... Thanks again for this Matt

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者atrens.時間21年前 (2004/09/10 02:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
0
內容預覽:
Hi Matt,. This is interesting, just tried to apply your patch and I get. rejects (see below). After looking closely I see that I _was_ in fact still u
(還有1473個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者atrens.時間21年前 (2004/09/10 02:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
0
內容預覽:
Matthew Dillon wrote:. > It can't be line 119 of linux_util.c, that's in the middle of a. > comment. > if you are using the patch I posted. If you are
(還有1510個字)

推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則,0人參與, 最新作者dillon.時間21年前 (2004/09/09 08:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
0
內容預覽:
It can't be line 119 of linux_util.c, that's in the middle of a comment. if you are using the patch I posted. If you are not using the patch. I posted
(還有6792個字)
首頁
上一頁
1
2
下一頁
尾頁