[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #2259] (Closed) off_t type definition
Issue #2259 has been updated by Sascha Wildner.
Status changed from New to Closed
Yes it is int64_t on Free and long long on open, both signed.
----------------------------------------
Bug #2259: off_t type definition
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2259
Author: Robin Carey
Status: Closed
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Dear DragonFlyBSD bugs,
Whilst checking some software I wrote (on leaf.dragonflybsd.org), I
discovered that the
off_t
type is a signed value (on leaf.dragonflybsd.org).
On OpenBSD and FreeBSD, off_t is an unsigned value (which I assume is what
it is supposed to be).
--
Sincerely,
Robin Carey BSc
--
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account