不知有沒有版上的先進有無用過
C值去修正fi值的經驗公式?
一直被質疑採用實驗的fi過於保守,被審查委員要求修正XD
小第一時間想不到,麻煩提點一下 謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.166.111.136
→
09/16 07:55, , 1F
09/16 07:55, 1F
→
09/16 07:57, , 2F
09/16 07:57, 2F
→
09/17 11:49, , 3F
09/17 11:49, 3F
→
09/17 11:54, , 4F
09/17 11:54, 4F
→
09/17 11:57, , 5F
09/17 11:57, 5F
→
09/17 11:57, , 6F
09/17 11:57, 6F
推
09/17 13:10, , 7F
09/17 13:10, 7F
C大也覺得太保守阿,說來慚愧當初這道擋土牆也是算的戰戰兢兢,沒經驗不敢太冒險,畢竟
是公家案子.到時來個地震不用傾倒,只要滑動一下,業主馬上找上門吧XD
不過,想請教有經驗的先進,分析的土層是黏土,計算主動土壓時,是否就遵循法規考量C值,
去修正深度,沒別的意思,只是想聽聽先進的意見作往後參考.
BTW 那條經驗公式我還是沒找到,有趣的是我朋友幫我請教他同事,沒想到一聽聞審查意見
馬上就猜出是某某委員.....這圈子要出名真的很容易XD
※ 編輯: zaft 來自: 61.64.207.94 (09/17 21:17)
推
09/17 22:47, , 8F
09/17 22:47, 8F
→
09/17 22:47, , 9F
09/17 22:47, 9F
→
09/17 22:49, , 10F
09/17 22:49, 10F
→
09/17 22:50, , 11F
09/17 22:50, 11F
→
09/17 22:50, , 12F
09/17 22:50, 12F
推
09/18 18:14, , 13F
09/18 18:14, 13F
→
09/18 18:14, , 14F
09/18 18:14, 14F
→
09/18 18:17, , 15F
09/18 18:17, 15F
→
09/18 18:19, , 16F
09/18 18:19, 16F
→
09/18 18:21, , 17F
09/18 18:21, 17F
→
09/18 18:23, , 18F
09/18 18:23, 18F
→
09/18 18:24, , 19F
09/18 18:24, 19F
→
09/20 15:21, , 20F
09/20 15:21, 20F
→
09/20 15:23, , 21F
09/20 15:23, 21F