[外電] 先別丟狗蛋的球衣
http://tinyurl.com/4yt5llt
So the Detroit Pistons are looking to dump Richard Hamilton and are rumored
considering dumping the 8th overall pick to save 20 million or so in cash.
The Bulls don't have a trade exception to save all that money for Detroit, so
they can't get in on that deal.
However, they might be able to dangle an even better deal for Detroit. One
that also helps the Bulls considerably as well.
Detroit trades Ben Gordon + #8th pick for Kyle Korver, Keith Bogans, Jannero
Pargo, John Lucas III, and one (or both) of the Bulls late 1sts.
I know what some of you will say:
Ben Gordon can't defend. -- He's better than Kyle Korver
Ben Gordon hogs the ball. -- They need that for the 2nd unit
Ben Gordon costs too much. -- Without a hard cap it doesn't matter
The Bulls need a selfish scorer to lead the second unit. They need a three
point shooter who performs in the clutch. They need someone who can put the
ball on the floor when team's try to chase them off the three point line.
Ben Gordon can do all these things, Kyle Korver can not. This is a big talent
upgrade.
The Bulls can also likely resign Bogans after Detroit waives him to save money
if they want him while Pargo and Lucas were signed to deals specifically to
make trades easier.
With the eighth pick the Bulls draft?
Don't know, Kevin States will probably tell us soon, however, DraftExpress has
this guy going eighth right now, and he sounds pretty good to me.
Regardless of whom the Bulls get at eighth, it's likely someone who is more
likely a future NBA starter with a likely to have a role player floor. Better
than deep in the draft where we're hoping for role player potential with a 'not
in the league' floor.
So what's the catch?
There are several. First, this plan hinges on the fact that the new CBA will
not institute a hard cap. I believe that's likely, because I don't believe the
owners are going to get the world, and a hard cap could actually be disastrous
for the league as well as unlike football which has national interest due to
fantasy football regardless of who is popular, parity may not work so well in
the NBA.
Of course we'll need to wait and see what the next CBA brings before knowing
for sure. Unfortunately, the trade needs to be made prior to the new CBA being
ratified, so the Bulls may get gun shy there.
Can Ben Gordon and Bulls management get along?
By the end, they clearly didn't like each other all that much. Gordon didn't
wait for an offer from Chicago, and Chicago didn't look like it was going to
make one if Gordon waited.
I'm sure there was some bitterness over his failed contract negotiations with
the Bulls in consecutive seasons, and Gordon was surely initially amped to join
such a winning organization like the Detroit Pistons. Totally different
atmosphere there I'm sure.
However, this is a case where time should heal all wounds. Gordon's in the
midst of basketball hell right now. His playing time has been crap, his
performance has slipped, his team stinks badly, and quite frankly Detroit, as a
city, is no Chicago.
I'm guessing that winning sixth man of the year for Chicago sounds a lot better
than trying to resurrect the Pistons with their current cast. From the Bulls
perspective, there simply aren't many high caliber SGs out there available.
Especially ones that can both shoot and put the ball on the floor.
Gordon is a good guy, a bit aloof, but an extraordinarily hard worker, and
would actually fit with coach Thibodeau's style of coaching very well as he
takes basketball extraordinarily seriously. Thibs also has great respect for
Gordon from when the Bulls played the Celtics in 2009.
What would the new Bulls rotation look like?
Starters: Rose, Brewer, Deng, Boozer, Noah
Bench: Watson, Gordon, Bogans, Taj, Asik, Thomas, #8
(assuming we resign Bogans after Detroit waives him and bring back Thomas for
one more year)
That gives the Bulls to put forth explosive offensive and defensive line ups
that they can't currently do as well as have someone to carry the scoring load
with the bench unit.
For this to work out well for the Bulls they don't merely rely on Ben Gordon
becoming a great player or a star player, they only rely on him accepting his
role as a bench player. Something he's far more likely to do after spending a
two year stint in basketball hell.
Would the Pistons really do this? Who knows. The rumors of their pick being
available for cap relief might be greatly exaggerated. If not, shedding 32
million rather than 20 million seems like a pretty sweet deal for them.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 67.167.1.221
推
06/01 12:24, , 1F
06/01 12:24, 1F
推
06/01 12:26, , 2F
06/01 12:26, 2F
推
06/01 12:30, , 3F
06/01 12:30, 3F
→
06/01 12:33, , 4F
06/01 12:33, 4F
→
06/01 12:34, , 5F
06/01 12:34, 5F
推
06/01 12:35, , 6F
06/01 12:35, 6F
推
06/01 12:36, , 7F
06/01 12:36, 7F
→
06/01 12:37, , 8F
06/01 12:37, 8F
→
06/01 12:38, , 9F
06/01 12:38, 9F
推
06/01 12:40, , 10F
06/01 12:40, 10F
→
06/01 12:42, , 11F
06/01 12:42, 11F
→
06/01 12:43, , 12F
06/01 12:43, 12F
推
06/01 12:43, , 13F
06/01 12:43, 13F
推
06/01 12:43, , 14F
06/01 12:43, 14F
→
06/01 12:43, , 15F
06/01 12:43, 15F
→
06/01 12:44, , 16F
06/01 12:44, 16F
推
06/01 12:44, , 17F
06/01 12:44, 17F
推
06/01 12:44, , 18F
06/01 12:44, 18F
→
06/01 12:44, , 19F
06/01 12:44, 19F
推
06/01 12:44, , 20F
06/01 12:44, 20F
→
06/01 12:46, , 21F
06/01 12:46, 21F
→
06/01 12:46, , 22F
06/01 12:46, 22F
→
06/01 12:47, , 23F
06/01 12:47, 23F
→
06/01 12:48, , 24F
06/01 12:48, 24F
推
06/01 12:49, , 25F
06/01 12:49, 25F
→
06/01 12:49, , 26F
06/01 12:49, 26F
推
06/01 12:50, , 27F
06/01 12:50, 27F
→
06/01 12:51, , 28F
06/01 12:51, 28F
→
06/01 12:51, , 29F
06/01 12:51, 29F
→
06/01 12:52, , 30F
06/01 12:52, 30F
推
06/01 12:53, , 31F
06/01 12:53, 31F
→
06/01 12:53, , 32F
06/01 12:53, 32F
→
06/01 12:53, , 33F
06/01 12:53, 33F
→
06/01 12:54, , 34F
06/01 12:54, 34F
推
06/01 12:54, , 35F
06/01 12:54, 35F
推
06/01 12:56, , 36F
06/01 12:56, 36F
→
06/01 12:56, , 37F
06/01 12:56, 37F
→
06/01 12:57, , 38F
06/01 12:57, 38F
推
06/01 12:57, , 39F
06/01 12:57, 39F
→
06/01 12:58, , 40F
06/01 12:58, 40F
推
06/01 12:58, , 41F
06/01 12:58, 41F
→
06/01 12:58, , 42F
06/01 12:58, 42F
→
06/01 12:59, , 43F
06/01 12:59, 43F
推
06/01 13:00, , 44F
06/01 13:00, 44F
推
06/01 13:05, , 45F
06/01 13:05, 45F
→
06/01 14:20, , 46F
06/01 14:20, 46F
→
06/01 14:21, , 47F
06/01 14:21, 47F
→
06/01 14:21, , 48F
06/01 14:21, 48F
推
06/01 14:22, , 49F
06/01 14:22, 49F
推
06/01 17:54, , 50F
06/01 17:54, 50F
→
06/01 17:57, , 51F
06/01 17:57, 51F
→
06/01 17:57, , 52F
06/01 17:57, 52F
推
06/01 21:25, , 53F
06/01 21:25, 53F
推
06/01 21:41, , 54F
06/01 21:41, 54F
→
06/01 21:42, , 55F
06/01 21:42, 55F
推
06/01 21:45, , 56F
06/01 21:45, 56F
→
06/01 21:46, , 57F
06/01 21:46, 57F
推
06/01 22:13, , 58F
06/01 22:13, 58F
推
06/01 22:29, , 59F
06/01 22:29, 59F
推
06/01 22:31, , 60F
06/01 22:31, 60F
推
06/01 22:36, , 61F
06/01 22:36, 61F
推
06/01 22:46, , 62F
06/01 22:46, 62F
→
06/01 22:48, , 63F
06/01 22:48, 63F
→
06/01 22:50, , 64F
06/01 22:50, 64F
推
06/01 22:54, , 65F
06/01 22:54, 65F
推
06/01 22:59, , 66F
06/01 22:59, 66F
→
06/01 23:02, , 67F
06/01 23:02, 67F
→
06/01 23:20, , 68F
06/01 23:20, 68F
推
06/01 23:24, , 69F
06/01 23:24, 69F
推
06/01 23:29, , 70F
06/01 23:29, 70F
推
06/02 00:24, , 71F
06/02 00:24, 71F
→
06/02 00:24, , 72F
06/02 00:24, 72F
推
06/02 00:25, , 73F
06/02 00:25, 73F
→
06/02 00:25, , 74F
06/02 00:25, 74F
推
06/02 01:06, , 75F
06/02 01:06, 75F
→
06/02 01:11, , 76F
06/02 01:11, 76F
推
06/02 17:59, , 77F
06/02 17:59, 77F
推
06/02 19:00, , 78F
06/02 19:00, 78F
→
12/10 13:30,
5年前
, 79F
12/10 13:30, 79F
→
04/19 03:29,
5年前
, 80F
04/19 03:29, 80F