[外電] How much is too much Rose?
看板ChicagoBulls作者bluesky3330 (穿白襪的小熊與公牛)時間13年前 (2011/05/09 20:21)推噓47(47推 0噓 117→)留言164則, 12人參與討論串1/1
How much is too much Rose?
By Nick Friedell
ATLANTA -- Chicago Bulls coach Tom Thibodeau knows people will question
Derrick Rose's shot selection after a painful Game 4 loss in which the
freshly minted NBA MVP was just 12-for-32 from the floor.
老席知道人們在第四戰後一定會質疑Rose那投32中12的出手選擇。
But given the way Rose has performed this season, Thibodeau believes that
criticism is unwarranted.
但是有鑑於Rose本季的表現,老席相信那些批評是沒有保固的(應該就是指馬上就會消失的
)
“You know, when he’s making the plays and he’s scoring, everyone’s saying
how great he is," Thibodeau said. "So tonight, he was aggressive. I didn’t
have any problem with the way he played. … It’s a make or miss league. If
they go down, we’re talking about the great plays and how unselfish he is.”
"你知道的,當他可以完成那些動作並且得分時,大家都會稱讚他"老席說。"而今晚他打
得很積極,對我來說那完全沒有問題,這是一個一翻兩瞪眼的聯盟,如果那些球進了,我
們現在討論的會是他的play跟無私。"
Instead, plenty of people around the league will question whether Rose simply
took too many shots in a game the Bulls believe they should have won.
然而,不少人會質疑Rose是否在這場公牛認為他們會贏的比賽裡出手太多了。
"It was a tough game tonight," Rose said. "But we'll make no excuses. If they
double team in the next game, we'll just have to do a better job of
executing. We didn't do as well on our execution with the double teams
tonight. I had some turnovers in the fourth quarter that hurt us, and we
didn't play as well down the stretch."
Rose說:
"今晚是一場艱難的比賽,但我們沒有藉口,如果他們在下一場依然包夾我們,我們就必須
在戰術執行上做得更好。我們今晚對於包夾的處理不夠好。我在第四節有些失誤,那對我
們造成了傷害,而且我們沒有堅持到最後關頭。"
As he did on Friday night in Game 3, Rose got to the rim whenever he wanted
at times. The difference was that the jumper that repeatedly fell for him
went missing again. The open and contested looks that he was draining on
Friday didn't go down on Sunday. Despite the struggles, his teammates didn't
believe he took an inordinate amount of poor shots.
如同他在第三戰做到的,他可以隨心所欲地殺到籃下,但是不同的在於那些跳投又不進了
。禮拜五那開放又有競爭力的視野在今天似乎消失了,雖然他是這樣掙扎著,但他的隊友
們卻不認為他太不知節制的出手了太多。
"I think when Derrick gets it going, he should shoot every time," Bulls guard
Kyle Korver said. "But when it's not there, we got to work it as a team. We
got to do a better job of getting open so he can see us, and he probably
needs to do a better job sometimes of finding us, but it's a team thing. You
can't out it on one person. Obviously, when he has it going, he is the best
basketball player in the world, and we want him to take every shot that he
feels like he's going to make."
KK說:"我想當Derrick打得順的時候,他應該每球都出手,但是當情況不是這樣時,我們
應該要打得像支球隊一樣,我們必須要跑出空檔讓他看到我們,而他也必須在找到我們這
件事情上做得更好。但這是一個團隊的事,你不能只靠一個人完成。很顯然地,當他感覺
來了,他就是世界上最好的球員,而我們要他做每一個他覺得會進的出手。"
Thibodeau feels the same way. He knows that Rose isn't going to lose
confidence after one poor shooting night.
老席也這麼認為,他知道Rose不會就這樣對自己失去信心。
"That’s the great thing about him," Thibodeau said. "He’ll be ready to go
in the next one. He kept driving the ball. I’m anxious to see the replays.
From my perspective, I thought he was getting fouled. Maybe he wasn’t going
hard enough.”
老席:
"這是他的一大優點,他會為下一戰準備好,他會不斷切入。我很想要趕快去看重播,以
我的觀點,我想他有被犯規,也許他打得不夠強硬。"
Given his track record, and the way he's bounced back after average nights
before, the Bulls are confident he will find a way to go even harder in Game
5 Tuesday night.
從他過往的紀錄以及他反彈的記錄來看,公牛有信心他會在第五戰打得更加努力。
....下一篇會有一段說明這樣的打法是誰叫他做的= =
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.194.101.30
→
05/09 20:22, , 1F
05/09 20:22, 1F
推
05/09 21:04, , 2F
05/09 21:04, 2F
→
05/09 21:07, , 3F
05/09 21:07, 3F
→
05/09 21:09, , 4F
05/09 21:09, 4F
※ 編輯: bluesky3330 來自: 123.194.101.30 (05/09 21:12)
推
05/09 21:13, , 5F
05/09 21:13, 5F
→
05/09 21:14, , 6F
05/09 21:14, 6F
→
05/09 21:15, , 7F
05/09 21:15, 7F
→
05/09 21:16, , 8F
05/09 21:16, 8F
→
05/09 21:16, , 9F
05/09 21:16, 9F
→
05/09 21:17, , 10F
05/09 21:17, 10F
→
05/09 21:18, , 11F
05/09 21:18, 11F
→
05/09 21:19, , 12F
05/09 21:19, 12F
→
05/09 21:20, , 13F
05/09 21:20, 13F
推
05/09 21:34, , 14F
05/09 21:34, 14F
→
05/09 21:37, , 15F
05/09 21:37, 15F
推
05/09 22:00, , 16F
05/09 22:00, 16F
→
05/09 22:01, , 17F
05/09 22:01, 17F
→
05/09 22:01, , 18F
05/09 22:01, 18F
→
05/09 22:02, , 19F
05/09 22:02, 19F
推
05/09 22:06, , 20F
05/09 22:06, 20F
→
05/09 22:07, , 21F
05/09 22:07, 21F
推
05/09 22:10, , 22F
05/09 22:10, 22F
→
05/09 22:11, , 23F
05/09 22:11, 23F
推
05/09 22:12, , 24F
05/09 22:12, 24F
→
05/09 22:13, , 25F
05/09 22:13, 25F
推
05/09 22:18, , 26F
05/09 22:18, 26F
→
05/09 22:18, , 27F
05/09 22:18, 27F
推
05/09 22:20, , 28F
05/09 22:20, 28F
推
05/09 22:26, , 29F
05/09 22:26, 29F
→
05/09 22:27, , 30F
05/09 22:27, 30F
→
05/09 22:27, , 31F
05/09 22:27, 31F
→
05/09 22:27, , 32F
05/09 22:27, 32F
→
05/09 22:29, , 33F
05/09 22:29, 33F
→
05/09 22:29, , 34F
05/09 22:29, 34F
→
05/09 22:30, , 35F
05/09 22:30, 35F
推
05/09 22:33, , 36F
05/09 22:33, 36F
推
05/09 22:53, , 37F
05/09 22:53, 37F
→
05/09 22:58, , 38F
05/09 22:58, 38F
還有 86 則推文
→
05/09 23:46, , 125F
05/09 23:46, 125F
→
05/09 23:47, , 126F
05/09 23:47, 126F
→
05/09 23:47, , 127F
05/09 23:47, 127F
→
05/09 23:47, , 128F
05/09 23:47, 128F
→
05/09 23:47, , 129F
05/09 23:47, 129F
→
05/09 23:48, , 130F
05/09 23:48, 130F
→
05/09 23:49, , 131F
05/09 23:49, 131F
→
05/09 23:49, , 132F
05/09 23:49, 132F
推
05/09 23:49, , 133F
05/09 23:49, 133F
推
05/09 23:49, , 134F
05/09 23:49, 134F
推
05/09 23:49, , 135F
05/09 23:49, 135F
→
05/09 23:49, , 136F
05/09 23:49, 136F
推
05/09 23:49, , 137F
05/09 23:49, 137F
→
05/09 23:50, , 138F
05/09 23:50, 138F
→
05/09 23:50, , 139F
05/09 23:50, 139F
→
05/09 23:51, , 140F
05/09 23:51, 140F
→
05/09 23:51, , 141F
05/09 23:51, 141F
→
05/09 23:53, , 142F
05/09 23:53, 142F
推
05/09 23:53, , 143F
05/09 23:53, 143F
推
05/09 23:54, , 144F
05/09 23:54, 144F
→
05/09 23:55, , 145F
05/09 23:55, 145F
→
05/09 23:55, , 146F
05/09 23:55, 146F
→
05/09 23:57, , 147F
05/09 23:57, 147F
推
05/09 23:57, , 148F
05/09 23:57, 148F
→
05/09 23:58, , 149F
05/09 23:58, 149F
→
05/09 23:59, , 150F
05/09 23:59, 150F
推
05/10 00:01, , 151F
05/10 00:01, 151F
→
05/10 00:01, , 152F
05/10 00:01, 152F
推
05/10 00:02, , 153F
05/10 00:02, 153F
→
05/10 00:02, , 154F
05/10 00:02, 154F
推
05/10 00:08, , 155F
05/10 00:08, 155F
推
05/10 00:10, , 156F
05/10 00:10, 156F
→
05/10 00:11, , 157F
05/10 00:11, 157F
推
05/10 01:05, , 158F
05/10 01:05, 158F
推
05/10 08:33, , 159F
05/10 08:33, 159F
推
05/10 10:49, , 160F
05/10 10:49, 160F
→
05/10 10:50, , 161F
05/10 10:50, 161F
→
05/10 11:37, , 162F
05/10 11:37, 162F
→
12/10 13:28,
5年前
, 163F
12/10 13:28, 163F
→
04/19 03:26,
5年前
, 164F
04/19 03:26, 164F