[轉錄][情報] Sources: Carmelo Anthony lists …

看板ChicagoBulls作者 (腦包)時間13年前 (2010/09/22 15:43), 編輯推噓15(15推 0噓 51→)
留言66則, 17人參與, 5年前最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1CcQklcV ] 作者: larson (哉哉) 看板: NBA 標題: [情報] Sources: Carmelo Anthony lists choices 時間: Wed Sep 22 15:09:32 2010 http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5602165 以下部分節錄原文: ESPN reports that in the past 72 hours, Carmelo Anthony's representatives have increased pressure on Denver to deal the superstar to either the Knicks or Bulls before training camp opens next week. The Knicks remain Anthony's top choice but the Bulls are now firmly established as a close second. The Nets and Rockets are also in the picture. Some within the Denver organization favor slowing down the process, hoping that Anthony might re-consider his stance once he is back with the team on a daily basis. The Knicks are offering either Danilo Gallinari or Anthony Randolph, but not both, along with the expiring contract of Eddy Curry. New York may also include its 2014 first-round pick. The Bulls appear to be unwilling to offer Joakim Noah, proposing instead a deal centered around Luol Deng, Taj Gibson and a first-round pick. Contrary to a recent report, the Rockets are not making Kevin Martin available in their bid to acquire Anthony. Melo 陣營傾向交易的去處:1.尼克 2.公牛 3.籃網 4.火箭(主要是前兩者) 各隊報價情況: 尼克: Eddy Curry的到期約 + A.Randolph (或Gallinari二選一) + 2014 首輪 公牛: Luol Deng + Taj Gibson + 一枚首輪 火箭: 駁斥之前傳聞,聲稱 Kevin Martin 不會被拿去交易Melo 籃網方面,有另外的消息: http://twitter.com/Chris_Broussard/status/25118485999 An NBA executive told Chris Broussard that Carmelo Anthony would not sign a contract extension with the New Jersey Nets. New Jersey is thought to be Denver's ideal trading partner but Anthony would first need to make a long-term commitment to the Nets before the team trades significant assets to the Nuggets. 籃網會要求 Melo 在交易到紐澤西前先延長合約, 但根據 Chris Broussard的 消息 指出, Melo 不會這麼做 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.113.208.240 ※ 編輯: opopoppj 來自: 140.113.208.240 (09/22 15:44)
→
09/22 15:46, , 1F
Noah Boozer Melo Korver Rose 能這樣就太爽啦
09/22 15:46, 1F
推
09/22 16:30, , 2F
如果我是金塊 我會要NOAH不可能要DENG
09/22 16:30, 2F
→
09/22 16:36, , 3F
金塊當然想要搶大的 問題是 尼克沒有可以搶的
09/22 16:36, 3F
→
09/22 16:37, , 4F
公牛不想被搶 火箭不想出馬丁 籃網不知道要不要出榜眼
09/22 16:37, 4F
→
09/22 16:37, , 5F
當然交易是否能成功也要看Melo答不答應延長合約
09/22 16:37, 5F
→
09/22 16:39, , 6F
希望耗到金塊自己認賠交易
09/22 16:39, 6F
→
09/22 17:54, , 7F
對金塊來說 公牛開的單不一定比尼克好
09/22 17:54, 7F
推
09/22 17:55, , 8F
滷蛋+gibson+第一輪算很有誠意 換掉Noah 甜瓜就算來 續
09/22 17:55, 8F
→
09/22 17:56, , 9F
約可能性也不會太大吧?
09/22 17:56, 9F
→
09/22 18:07, , 10F
公牛給的一輪選秀權應該是一輪尾段
09/22 18:07, 10F
→
09/22 18:10, , 11F
Deng有一定數據 但還有四年約和一些傷病史 是較不利的地方
09/22 18:10, 11F
推
09/22 19:18, , 12F
感覺機會不大
09/22 19:18, 12F
推
09/22 19:44, , 13F
滷蛋的約有點爛 新版CBA出來之前吃長約不是很明智
09/22 19:44, 13F
→
09/22 19:45, , 14F
吃長約就卡住金塊自己的重建了 這樣認賠也是跟尼克換
09/22 19:45, 14F
→
09/22 19:48, , 15F
真的證實開放換 尼克搞不好咖哩那妳跟A軟一起丟都有可
09/22 19:48, 15F
→
09/22 19:49, , 16F
能～尼克好處就是之後還有薪資空間可以拉一條大咖進來
09/22 19:49, 16F
推
09/23 01:44, , 17F
opo誰說尼克沒有可以搶,尼克只要Gallo+A.Randoph就超過
09/23 01:44, 17F
→
09/23 01:45, , 18F
公牛出Deng+Gibson,比年紀比天賦都是尼克那兩隻贏
09/23 01:45, 18F
推
09/23 08:43, , 19F
那又是誰說尼克要一次拿那兩隻換甜瓜了？誰跟你這樣比q
09/23 08:43, 19F
→
09/23 08:55, , 20F
DENG除了約稍大，有板有防守，是有像你說的那麼不值嗎?
09/23 08:55, 20F
→
09/23 08:56, , 21F
說A.RANDOLPH有天賦，他目前也僅止於此，等他打出來再
09/23 08:56, 21F
→
09/23 08:56, , 22F
拿他跟DENG相提並論吧
09/23 08:56, 22F
推
09/23 09:12, , 23F
這是melo陣營想來公牛，以金塊角度 沒noah我看是不可
09/23 09:12, 23F
→
09/23 09:12, , 24F
能來了
09/23 09:12, 24F
→
09/23 09:14, , 25F
球員強不強是一回事 但金塊一但交易melo就是確定重建
09/23 09:14, 25F
→
09/23 09:14, , 26F
從重建的需求來看 我想Gallo+A.Randoph吸引力應該大於
09/23 09:14, 26F
→
09/23 09:16, , 27F
Deng 而且Deng還四年約這點 吸引力也會打折扣
09/23 09:16, 27F
→
09/23 13:03, , 28F
Deng當年是哪一點吸引到公牛給他這麼長的約阿?
09/23 13:03, 28F
推
09/23 13:13, , 29F
看來上面沒看過當年清盤熱火時的Deng
09/23 13:13, 29F
→
09/23 13:16, , 30F
有影片嗎@@ 目前滷蛋在水管的影片不多@@
09/23 13:16, 30F
推
09/23 13:22, , 31F
當年季後賽橫掃熱火DENG四場得分 33 26 24 22當年22歲
09/23 13:22, 31F
→
09/23 13:24, , 32F
季後賽十場比賽平均數據22.2分8.7籃板2.4助攻.524命中率
09/23 13:24, 32F
→
09/23 13:25, , 33F
一名22歲的球員在季後賽有這種數據 而且畢業於duke名校
09/23 13:25, 33F
→
09/23 13:26, , 34F
模板是G.HILL 品行良好肯努力 拿到那麼長的約不過分
09/23 13:26, 34F
→
09/23 13:27, , 35F
就算沒交易到MELO, Deng也會是公牛很稱職的小前鋒
09/23 13:27, 35F
→
09/23 13:32, , 36F
那滷蛋是受了什麼傷? 感覺爆發力沒太出色
09/23 13:32, 36F
→
09/23 14:01, , 37F
當年DENG和GORDON在做選擇 簽DENG之後大家也沒啥意見
09/23 14:01, 37F
→
09/23 14:05, , 38F
之後表現不如預期甚至更遭 雖和教練陣容受傷有關
09/23 14:05, 38F
推
09/23 14:06, , 39F
覺得要拿戒能搶甜瓜就搶吧
09/23 14:06, 39F
推
09/23 14:08, , 40F
Deng體能本來就不怎樣~跟他傷沒啥關係
09/23 14:08, 40F
→
09/23 14:09, , 41F
但跟拿到的薪水落差太大。不過屬於場上拼命型的球員
09/23 14:09, 41F
→
09/23 14:10, , 42F
也沒什麼華麗的技巧
09/23 14:10, 42F
→
09/23 14:13, , 43F
不過之後的比賽發現其實Deng打熱火數據都不錯...
09/23 14:13, 43F
推
09/23 15:48, , 44F
因為熱火在小前這個點一直都是痛阿~現在是LBJ = =
09/23 15:48, 44F
→
09/23 17:16, , 45F
去年季後賽VS騎士 DENG成績18分6.7籃板1.4助攻 沒打很差
09/23 17:16, 45F
推
09/23 17:26, , 46F
Deng受傷帶來的影響應該是打打停停而無法維持穩定的表現
09/23 17:26, 46F
→
09/23 17:27, , 47F
以數字來看，今年才跟06-07球季的數據接近，會讓人有簽約
09/23 17:27, 47F
→
09/23 17:28, , 48F
之後表現糟的印象，而且他不是一名領導型球員，這也是讓
09/23 17:28, 48F
→
09/23 17:30, , 49F
人覺得有點overpaid的原因，但他如果能穩定上場，恍神情
09/23 17:30, 49F
→
09/23 17:31, , 50F
況少一點XD我想他在小前鋒這個位置該可佔一席之地
09/23 17:31, 50F
→
09/23 20:16, , 51F
話說 公牛為啥不多加個James Johnson阿?
09/23 20:16, 51F
→
09/23 20:17, , 52F
好歹他還有點練起來的希望
09/23 20:17, 52F
推
09/23 23:46, , 53F
eth你根本沒看清楚我的推文吧,我是說如果金塊非搶不可
09/23 23:46, 53F
→
09/23 23:46, , 54F
尼克可以搶的會比公牛可以搶的多,因為Noah是非賣品
09/23 23:46, 54F
→
09/23 23:47, , 55F
至於Deng,我本人是滿欣賞他的,他最大的問題就是大約
09/23 23:47, 55F
→
09/23 23:47, , 56F
這個約真的太鳥完全降低他的交易價值,只比實力他很厲害
09/23 23:47, 56F
→
09/23 23:47, , 57F
但比CP值跟約長就.....
09/23 23:47, 57F
→
09/23 23:48, , 58F
附帶一題,你還是沒看懂我的比法,我是拿Deng比Gallo
09/23 23:48, 58F
→
09/23 23:48, , 59F
Gibson比A.Randoph...我還是覺得尼克那兩隻較有價值
09/23 23:48, 59F
推
09/23 23:59, , 60F
沒有說他打不好 只是金塊要重建他的約有點長
09/23 23:59, 60F
→
09/24 00:01, , 61F
很多球隊都在看新版CBA 你看諾阿的約一直拖
09/24 00:01, 61F
→
09/24 00:02, , 62F
還有老鷹的哈彿~ 換成以前早換約了 線在不知道再拖啥
09/24 00:02, 62F
→
09/24 00:04, , 63F
應該是走向降薪的機會很大~~
09/24 00:04, 63F
→
09/27 06:39, , 64F
又來囉！又來囉！XDDD
09/27 06:39, 64F
→
12/10 13:18, 5年前 , 65F
Noah Boozer https://noxiv.com
12/10 13:18, 65F
→
04/19 03:16, 5年前 , 66F
應該是走向降薪的機會很 http://yaxiv.com
04/19 03:16, 66F
‣ 更多 opopoppj 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1CcREvAQ (ChicagoBulls)