[情報] 俱樂部收購案，伯利隊即將勝出

看板Chelsea作者 (首席百人隊長)時間2年前 (2022/04/30 01:47), 2年前編輯推噓18(18推 0噓 14→)
留言32則, 9人參與, 2年前最新討論串1/1
https://www.ineos.com/news/ineos-group/statement-from-ineos-on-the -acquisition-of-chelsea-fc/ Statement from INEOS on the acquisition of Chelsea FC Friday, April 29, 2022 Sir Jim Ratcliffe, Chairman of INEOS, has made a formal bid for Chelsea FC, for ￡4.25bn. ￡2.5bn is committed to the Charitable Trust to support victims of the war, with ￡1.75bn committed to investment directly into the club over the next 10 years. This is a British bid, for a British club. We believe that a club is bigger than its owners who are temporary custodians of a great tradition. With responsibility to the fans and the community. That is why we are committing to spending ￡1.75bn over 10 years that will be for the direct benefit of the club. We will invest in Stamford Bridge to make it a world-class stadium, befitting of Chelsea FC. This will be organic and on-going so that we will not move away from the home of Chelsea and risk losing the support of loyal fans. We will continue to invest in the team to ensure we have a first class squad of the world's greatest players, coaches and support staff, in the men's and women's games. And we hope to continue to invest in the academy to provide opportunity for talented youngsters to develop into first class players. We believe that London should have a club that reflects the stature of the city. One that is held in the same regard as Real Madrid, Barcelona or Bayern Munich. We intend Chelsea to be that club. We are making this investment as fans of the beautiful game – not as a means to turn a profit. We do that with our core businesses. The club is rooted in its community and its fans. And it is our intention to invest in Chelsea FC for that reason. No further comment will be made from Sir Jim or INEOS during the bidding process. https://twitter.com/AbsoluteChelsea/status/1520026489194004480 下午9:05 · 2022年4月29日 Sir Jim Ratcliffe: "We put an offer in this morning. We are the only British bid. Our motives are simply to try and create a very fine club in London. We have no profit motive because we make our money in other ways." [via @TimesSport] https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1520034473303289857 下午9:37 · 2022年4月29日 Ratcliffe is a Manchester United supporter but has held a Chelsea season ticket and owns the French club Nice. In March, his spokespeople were dismissing the idea of him bidding for Chelsea. https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1520035411661307904 下午9:40 · 2022年4月29日 He lives in Monaco, which was reported to have saved him - wait for it - ￡4bn (pretty much the exact full cost of Chelsea) in tax https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1520034761993068545 下午9:38 · 2022年4月29日 The @ChelseaSTrust yet to hear from Sir Jim Ratcliffe. Vice-Chair Dom Rosso said: “The CST are yet to be contacted by Sir Jim Ratcliffe or his team. If these reports are true, we would welcome dialogue at the earliest opportunity.” https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1520036677561028608 下午9:45 · 2022年4月29日 The Chelsea Pitch Owners have also never heard from Sir Jim Ratcliffe or anybody representing him or Ineos. All the other bidders have put a lot of time in speaking to both groups. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1520041002085629952 下午10:03 · 2022年4月29日 Breaking: Los Angeles Dodgers part-owner Todd Boehly is set to enter exclusive talks in the bidding war to acquire Chelsea FC from Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich, people familiar with the matter say https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1520042406858661894 下午10:08 · 2022年4月29日 Breaking: Stephen Pagliuca's group have been informed they will not be the preferred bidder for Chelsea https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1520046402381918208 下午10:24 · 2022年4月29日 Sources close to Chelsea sale process tell me the Sir Martin Broughton bid may also be out of the running. But no confirmation yet from his group https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520056092474101761 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520056094244151296 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520056095909326850 下午11:03 · 2022年4月29日 Chelsea sale has taken a huge twist with a 4.25m offer from Jim Ratcliffe. There was always talk of a fifth 'mystery' bidder but Raine played this down. The offer will be billed as 'last minute' but has been planned (but not tabled) since late March. However, Ratcliffe has still bypassed the process a little and jumped straight to the final stage. Steve Pagliuca is out the running. The Martin Broughton bid has failed, too, with partial loan-funding behind the financing seen as a negative. The Boehly bid is still best-positioned to be the preferred bidder. But as of now they have NOT entered into exclusive talks (yet) or been told they are the preferred bidder. Ratcliffe's bid has clearly complicated matters. https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1520057122226151424 下午11:07 · 2022年4月29日 No comment from Boehly group, Raine or Chelsea but now strong suggestions that Todd Boehly's group has been chosen as the club's preferred buyer. That's also the view of people inside the Pagliuca and Broughton bids. https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520082169552637954 上午12:46 · 2022年4月30日 Boehly group source confirms they will now enter “exclusive talks” to buy Chelsea. There is “surprise and bemusement” at the timing of Ratcliffe's statement/offer. But the situation is clear now: the Boehly group is the preferred bidder. https://twitter.com/Matt_Law_DT/status/1520085225707130881 上午12:58 · 2022年4月30日 My understanding, still unconfirmed by his group, Raine and Chelsea, is that Todd Boehly will be named as the preferred buyer for Chelsea. Story to follow. https://twitter.com/SamiMokbel81_DM/status/1520086791193350145 上午1:05 · 2022年4月30日 Todd Boehly to be officially selected as preferred bidder for Chelsea. Boehly now has 5-7 days to sign purchase agreement - if that elapses then Sir Jim Ratcliffe's bid could come into play. With @MattHughesDM https://twitter.com/TeleFootball/status/1520087632096681989 上午1:08 · 2022年4月30日 Confirmed: Todd Boehly has won the race to buy Chelsea in a deal worth more than ￡3.5billion, despite a dramatic late hijack attempt from Britain's richest man Sir Jim Ratcliffe https://twitter.com/AbsoluteChelsea/status/1520089782877048832 上午1:17 · 2022年4月30日 Chelsea's intention is to advance Todd Boehly and his group for UK Government approval ahead of a licence for the sale of the club to be issued after they were named the preferred takeover bidder. [via @TeleFootball] https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520090439432429575 上午1:19 · 2022年4月30日 The Boehly bid were only told around an hour ago (about 12 ET) they were the preferred bidder. However, they have been confident for weeks. They are surprised and confused by the Ratcliffe bid but don't see it as cause for concern as they look to complete the sale before May 31. -- Hoddle: 'Matthew will be sitting up there looking down now and loving Chelsea being winners. He'll just love Chelsea winning.' -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.249.156.234 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Chelsea/M.1651254425.A.C5A.html
推
04/30 02:11, 2年前 , 1F
總算快落幕了
04/30 02:11, 1F
→
04/30 02:30, 2年前 , 2F
還可以突襲報價這種的，果然有錢人就是不一樣
04/30 02:30, 2F
推
04/30 02:44, 2年前 , 3F
波利有多拿錢出來的樣子
04/30 02:44, 3F
推
04/30 02:51, 2年前 , 4F
不過是Ratcliffe的話 感覺截胡好像也不是不可能
04/30 02:51, 4F
→
04/30 02:51, 2年前 , 5F
算了 波利也好 拉特克利夫也罷 趕快交易完成就對了
04/30 02:51, 5F
推
04/30 02:55, 2年前 , 6F
Ratcliffe這報價也太奇怪了吧 之前說不買
04/30 02:55, 6F
→
04/30 02:55, 2年前 , 7F
然後都截標了才報價 自己手上還持有尼斯
04/30 02:55, 7F
→
04/30 02:56, 2年前 , 8F
尼斯下賽季還很可能有歐冠(代表要賣)
04/30 02:56, 8F
→
04/30 02:56, 2年前 , 9F
這操作沒看懂
04/30 02:56, 9F
→
04/30 03:12, 2年前 , 10F
新老板誰不重要，趕快五月底前完成轉移才是正途
04/30 03:12, 10F
→
04/30 03:13, 2年前 , 11F
超過時間不知道又要被怎麼惡搞
04/30 03:13, 11F
推
04/30 03:26, 2年前 , 12F
其實一個月前BBC有記者說還有另一組買家，不過這個消
04/30 03:26, 12F
→
04/30 03:27, 2年前 , 13F
息最後也沒下文
04/30 03:27, 13F
推
04/30 03:34, 2年前 , 14F
有說過 但最終截止日就確定沒有or被擠出去了
04/30 03:34, 14F
→
04/30 03:35, 2年前 , 15F
他這個是插隊式報價的 如果伯利輸他肯定超不爽XD
04/30 03:35, 15F
推
04/30 03:37, 2年前 , 16F
但我記得雷恩好像也說過截止日後也不排斥其他財團的
04/30 03:37, 16F
→
04/30 03:38, 2年前 , 17F
加入。但他要如何在短時間內處理尼斯的事情
04/30 03:38, 17F
推
04/30 04:33, 2年前 , 18F
他是直接從英國政府這關入手？
04/30 04:33, 18F
推
04/30 08:43, 2年前 , 19F
一堆老闆手上有球隊看到車車要賣流口水 手邊股份都不管
04/30 08:43, 19F
推
04/30 10:01, 2年前 , 20F
我是伯利 我一定會不爽…
04/30 10:01, 20F
→
04/30 10:01, 2年前 , 21F
不過希望新老闆趕快推出來
04/30 10:01, 21F
推
04/30 11:21, 2年前 , 22F
這時候插隊有點討厭 不要再拖了QQ
04/30 11:21, 22F
推
04/30 12:55, 2年前 , 23F
伯利確定是贏家了 沒意外會開始審核
04/30 12:55, 23F
推
04/30 15:21, 2年前 , 24F
拉特克利夫直接繞過雷恩 直接找高層跟英國政府的
04/30 15:21, 24F
→
04/30 15:22, 2年前 , 25F
不知道英國那邊會怎麼喬
04/30 15:22, 25F
推
04/30 15:24, 2年前 , 26F
看TA新聞 英國政府的決定也蠻重要的
04/30 15:24, 26F
推
04/30 15:28, 2年前 , 27F
波利是領頭羊沒錯 但是拉特克利夫的出價也沒有被排除
04/30 15:28, 27F
→
04/30 15:28, 2年前 , 28F
目前大概是這樣
04/30 15:28, 28F
https://bbs.hupu.com/53389820.html https://theathletic.com/3282051/2022/04/30/explained-ratcliffe-boehly-and -a-dramatic-twist-in-the-race-to-buy-chelsea/ By Matt Slater - Apr 30, 2022 The Athletic 從消息源得知，拉特克里夫這個報價是直接交給切爾西管理層的， 而不是雷恩集團。在這家美國商業銀行宣佈伯利勝出數小時後，他們似乎不知道拉特 克里夫出價的細節。公平地說，拉特克里夫的聲明中沒有太多細節 — 它更像是一份 使命聲明，而不是一份全額資助的合約 — 但毫無疑問，他們沒有預見到這一點。 The Athletic 得知拉特克里夫本週才決定加入競爭，但他已經迅速行動，準備 提出他認為最具吸引力的報價。例如，他已經與英國政府進行了溝通，英國政府對這 筆交易擁有否決權。據了解他本週一直在倫敦，可能是在與幫助他的銀行人士交談。 不過，他還沒有找到時間對任何球迷群體談話。 一位與拉特克里夫打過交道的消息人士表示：“如果拉特克里夫真的想贏，他就 能贏，因為他將得到英力士的支持，而且他可以增加企業信貸額度，為此次收購提供 資金。和他不同，伯利和其他人必須與他們組織的成員打交道。” 英力士去年的稅後利潤為17億英鎊。毫無疑問拉特克里夫可以負擔得起切爾西， 他也有信心在幾天內完成這筆交易。畢竟時間是短暫的，切爾西之所以能繼續參加各 項賽事是因為他們得到了特許經營，它將在五月底到期。 所以理論上，拉特克里夫還有時間，但前提是雷恩集團願意告訴其他幾家競購方 這筆錢是來自英國最富有的體育迷的42.5億英鎊，而這位體育迷恰好是一位支持英國 脫歐、揮舞著旗幟的愛國者。 https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/-b2068974.html Nick Purewal 30 Apr 2022 Sir Jim Ratcliffe's last-minute bid for Chelsea FC has received serious consideration in the race to buy the Stamford Bridge club, the PA news agency understands. Todd Boehly's consortium is understood to remain on course to be confirmed as the preferred bidder and then handed the opportunity to seal a Stamford Bridge takeover. Stamford Bridge bosses had not expected Ratcliffe to make such a late, dramatic entrance into the race however, with the British tycoon understood to have met with Blues chairman Bruce Buck on Thursday. https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345543876268032 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345545268772864 下午6:13 · 2022年4月30日 Pagliuca's plans for renovating Stamford Bridge lacked a clear roadmap and no written confirmation of if/how he planned to scale back Atalanta was provided. A public statement reaffirming his commitment only provided more questions. Broughton's bid required partial funding via loans. This counted against the bid in a decision based on fine margins. The “celebritizion” (as one Raine source put it) of the bid wasn't well received either and was seen as a move to turn the sale into a popularity contest. https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345546665439232 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345548041117698 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345550108905473 But above all else, Boehly's bid just stood out. One of the reasons why is because, in each area suitors were asked to focus on, the group provided real experts. The bid is a collective effort with Clearlake the majority owner but a range of impressive voices inputting. Behdad Eghbali is pretty hands on and engaged. He's a big football fan also. But Boehly, as minority owner, plans to assume day to day control. Jonny Goldstein (and the support of David Hickey) really impressed Chelsea. As previously reported, the Boehly group always had the strongest and most detailed plans for the redevelopment of Stamford Bridge. They have been confident for weeks of winning. https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345551627296768 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345553049169920 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345554345209860 Jim Ratcliffe's last-minute ￡4.25bn bid took Boehly, and the two failed suitors, by surprise. Ratcliffe initially expressed interest in March but then decided not to formally bid. Last week he then saw a window of opportunity as the sale dragged on. Interestingly, sources tell me Ratcliffe bypassed Raine, and by dealing directly with Chelsea was confident in entering the race. He has not to date been told his bid is too late. But Chelsea will prioritise Boehly meaning Ratcliffe has a lot out of his control. Two other points which are key: Ratcliffe bid isn't astronomically higher than Boehly's since price includes charitable donation. And Ratcliffe, like Pagliuca with Atalanta, must address ownership of Nice. That makes completing a CFC sale in days (as he says he can) unlikely. https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345555867684865 https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/status/1520345557247705088 Ratcliffe's offer clearly puts pressure on Boehly to wrap up l sale quickly. And it's clear Chelsea and Abramovich (who failed to agree a price with Ratcliffe in 2019) are open to abandoning the formal sale process and considering 'rogue' bids if it doesn't work out with Boehly. But to again reiterate, Boehly is the preferred bidder and the group is confident that Ratcliffe's offer won't affect anything. They have always said, if selected, they see no reason why they can't complete the sale before Chelsea's special license expires on May 31.
推
04/30 21:12, 2年前 , 29F
如果是直接找英國政府跟高層的話，那就有戲了，現在
04/30 21:12, 29F
→
04/30 21:13, 2年前 , 30F
他的報價是被認真考慮了
04/30 21:13, 30F
推
04/30 21:52, 2年前 , 31F
我本來以為都要有結果了！拜託快結束吧！
04/30 21:52, 31F
推
04/30 21:55, 2年前 , 32F
即便伯利是首選報價人，還要再進行5到7天的談判呢
04/30 21:55, 32F
https://news.sky.com/story/preferred-chelsea-bidder-offers-premier-league -reassurance-over-investors-12603467 Mark Kleinman - Sunday 1 May 2022 17:14, UK Sources close to the consortium, which is spearheaded by Todd Boehly, the LA Dodgers part-owner, said it had offered a total price that was slightly higher than the ￡4.25bn publicly pledged by Sir Jim Ratcliffe, the chemicals tycoon who tried to gatecrash the auction on Friday. An insider suggested that Sir Jim and his Ineos group would need to table a substantially higher offer in order to persuade Mr Abramovich and his advisers to stand a chance of entering negotiations about a deal. The Premier League is said to be "advanced" in its scrutiny of the Clearlake consortium under its Owners And Directors Test, with questions now submitted to the group relating to the final financial structure of the takeover and the precise stakes that would be owned by each of the investors. Mr Boehly's bid would see voting rights shared equally between him and California-based Clearlake. Clearlake, which has no direct ownership pedigree in major sports assets, would own a majority of the shares in Chelsea, Sky News revealed last week. One person close to the process said it was likely that two separate licences would ultimately be issued by the government: one to implement the transaction itself, and the other to release the proceeds of the sale. ※ 編輯: JamesCaesar (111.249.156.234 臺灣), 05/02/2022 03:16:53
‣ 更多 JamesCaesar 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1YR2IPnQ (Chelsea)