[新聞] C's提給黃蜂的交易提案
新聞出處(必填): http://goo.gl/D9qDtc
作者: Zach Lowe
內文超長,有興趣自已看吧
節錄重點..
In the days before the draft, Charlotte peddled that no. 9 pick and Vonleh to
some of the teams ahead of it — an attempt to vault into star range. The
Hornets found no takers before ultimately giving up and sending Vonleh to
Portland for Nicolas Batum the day before the draft. As the drama unfolded
the next night, Boston put Charlotte on the other end of a
quantity-for-quality pitch. The Celtics offered four first-round picks for
the chance to move up from no. 16 to no. 9: that 16th pick, no. 15 (acquired
in a prearranged contingency deal with the Hawks), one unprotected future
Brooklyn pick, and a future first-rounder from either the Grizzlies or
Timberwolves, per sources familiar with the talks.
選秀前幾天,黃蜂本來打算想把9號簽加上Vonleh向上交易,失敗後把後者送至拓荒者
而C's在選秀會上提出了拿16和15順位!!(會跟老鷹交易過來)再加上網隊的首輪,再加上
灰熊或是灰狼的首輪.
(這真的是很誇張的提案...竟然還要去換15號簽@@)
Some members of Charlotte’s front office liked the Boston deal, but Michael
Jordan, the team’s owner and ultimate decision-maker, preferred Kaminsky to
a pile of first-rounders outside the lottery, per several sources.
一些黃蜂的制服組被C's的提案打動了,但是最終被Jordan本人否決...他偏愛Kaminsky
(現在回頭來看的話..是否該感謝Jordan的漂亮阻擋...)
再來是黃蜂制服組的解釋..
“You have two minutes to decide: ‘Do I want to do this trade?’” says
Polk, one of five men atop Charlotte’s decision tree.2 “You don’t have a
day. You don’t have hours. After all the intelligence we’d done, we were
comfortable with Frank. But now you have two minutes to decide if you make
this trade, who you’re gonna take at no. 16, or maybe no. 20, and we haven’
t been focusing on that range. In fantasy basketball, it sounds great: ‘Oh
my god, they could have gotten all those picks.’ But in the real world, I’m
not sure it makes us better.”
Polk:" 你只有2分鐘可以決定,到底要不要接受. 沒有一整天甚至幾個小時的時間.所有
我們的準備都決定要選Kaminsky. 但是你現在就只有2分鐘 (很重要所以要多講幾次)去
決定到底你要在16順位或20順位選誰,而我們之前並沒有注意到這些順位.(最好是這麼混)
如果是玩Fantasy Basketball的話,當然很讚 :" 天呀! 可以得到這麼多選秀權",但在現
實世界,我不確定這樣可以讓我們更好"
Adds Rich Cho, the team’s GM: “If it was such a no-brainer for us, why
would another team want to do it?”
Cho :" 如果這個提案有這麼讚的話,為什麼其它球隊不接受?" (放大絕)
Polk argues drafting extra players might have cramped Charlotte’s roster
space. “We didn’t have enough spots after picking up Spencer Hawes, Jeremy
Lamb, and Batum,” Polk says. “Even if someone wants to give me first-round
picks, what am I going to do with them?”
Polk 再補充,因為補了Hawes、Jeremy Lamb 和Batum 球隊人數已經滿了 "就算有人
再給我多的首輪簽,我到底能拿它們做什麼呢? "
(Ainge: 你知道我用多少球員才換到這些簽嗎...)
再往下就是分析黃蜂的陣容、未來、過去的選秀..管理層 等等..自行看原文吧
==============================================================================
感想就是黃蜂的制服組...目前的操作比較偏保守的
或許他們在選秀上失利太多次了,以致於被Ainge視為至寶的選秀權對黃蜂的吸引力小很多
無論MKG或是Zeller這種潛力股都還沒發揮出期待的實力,Kamisky這種完成度較高而且
失敗率低很多的球員,反而是他們的首選.
還有決定權完全是在MJ手上,不像C's交給GM(Ainge)來下決定(沒聽過老闆有下過指導棋)
另外和非人講的一樣,他們真的沒準備中後段的選秀...Ainge大概也無言吧.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.116.9.135
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Celtics/M.1438187773.A.1C8.html
推
07/30 00:48, , 1F
07/30 00:48, 1F
推
07/30 00:48, , 2F
07/30 00:48, 2F
→
07/30 00:48, , 3F
07/30 00:48, 3F
→
07/30 00:48, , 4F
07/30 00:48, 4F
→
07/30 00:50, , 5F
07/30 00:50, 5F
→
07/30 00:50, , 6F
07/30 00:50, 6F
推
07/30 00:56, , 7F
07/30 00:56, 7F
推
07/30 01:03, , 8F
07/30 01:03, 8F
→
07/30 01:03, , 9F
07/30 01:03, 9F
推
07/30 01:45, , 10F
07/30 01:45, 10F
→
07/30 01:45, , 11F
07/30 01:45, 11F
→
07/30 02:03, , 12F
07/30 02:03, 12F
推
07/30 10:07, , 13F
07/30 10:07, 13F
→
07/30 10:08, , 14F
07/30 10:08, 14F
→
07/30 10:09, , 15F
07/30 10:09, 15F
→
07/30 10:10, , 16F
07/30 10:10, 16F
推
07/30 10:52, , 17F
07/30 10:52, 17F
→
07/30 10:52, , 18F
07/30 10:52, 18F
→
07/30 10:52, , 19F
07/30 10:52, 19F
推
07/30 11:08, , 20F
07/30 11:08, 20F
→
07/30 12:45, , 21F
07/30 12:45, 21F
→
07/30 12:45, , 22F
07/30 12:45, 22F
→
07/30 12:45, , 23F
07/30 12:45, 23F
→
07/30 12:45, , 24F
07/30 12:45, 24F
推
07/30 15:34, , 25F
07/30 15:34, 25F
→
07/31 21:43, , 26F
07/31 21:43, 26F
→
07/31 21:43, , 27F
07/31 21:43, 27F
→
07/31 21:45, , 28F
07/31 21:45, 28F
→
07/31 21:46, , 29F
07/31 21:46, 29F
→
07/31 21:47, , 30F
07/31 21:47, 30F
→
07/31 21:47, , 31F
07/31 21:47, 31F
推
08/01 12:46, , 32F
08/01 12:46, 32F
→
08/01 12:57, , 33F
08/01 12:57, 33F
→
08/01 12:58, , 34F
08/01 12:58, 34F
推
08/01 14:14, , 35F
08/01 14:14, 35F
推
08/01 22:28, , 36F
08/01 22:28, 36F