[外電] 綠軍單月15敗 隊史最差
新聞出處:http://ppt.cc/8xFA
作者:RICH LEVINE
The Celtics lost a game that they should have won on Wednesday night. Not
only because they were playing the 76ers (and at home), but also because they
were up 94-93 with less than five seconds left.
昨天輸給應該贏的76人
They needed one stop to secure a victory, and they didn’t get it.
In the end, Evan Turner’s buzzer-beater gave Philadelphia a 95-94 win, and
more importantly, as far as we’re concerned, granted this Celtics team a
special place in the franchise record books. But not the fun record book. Not
the one with the fancy design cover featuring pictures of Russell and Bird
and Pierce and Auerbach. Instead, it’s that record book the Celtics keep
hidden in some random janitor’s closet underneath the Garden. The one that’
s covered in dust, on top of a large photo of Vin Baker and Mark Blount
standing back-to-back with their arms folded and giant grins on their faces.
Last night marked Boston’s 17th and final game in January, and they lost 15
of those games. Believe or not, that’s more games than a Celtics team has
ever lost in a single month. Ever.
最近單月輸15場 也創下隊史單月最差的紀錄
The 2006-2007 Celtics lost 18 games in a row, but that was spread over two
months. They never lost more than 14 games in one month.
06-07年 有18敗過 但是那是2個月合計 隊史從未這麼糟過 單月超過14敗
The 1996-97 Celtics went 15-67, and posted double-digit losses in every month
but April (when they still managed to lose eight games in 10 tries), but
again, their single-month high was 14.
I should probably mention that this year’s Celtics played 17 games in
January, which is more than either of those previous two teams did in any
month. If given the chance, it’s fair to assume that one of them would have
seized the opportunity to tack on a few more Ls. But they didn’t get it.
These Celtics did. They set the record, and I think I speak for everyone when
I say that I hope this one remains in tact for a long, long time.
On the other hand, it’s fair to wonder whether Turner’s buzzer beater might
also change Celtics history for the better. And in a way that’s far more
significant than a meaningless record for “Most Losses in a Month.” After
all, the Celtics and Sixers came into this season with the expectation to be
among the worst teams in the league, and to this point, both have lived up to
the hype. After last night, the Celtics are 15-33 and the Sixers are 15-31.
These teams are running neck and neck at the bottom of the Eastern Conference
standings, and there’s no reason to expect that to change. It wouldn’t be
remotely surprising to see Boston and Philly remain with a game or two of
each other for the rest of the season, and ultimately finish side-by-side in
the standings. Maybe it’s the difference between the fifth and sixth worst
record in the league, or as it stands now, the difference between third and
fourth worst. Either way, that’s significant.
在昨晚之後 賽軍位於大西洋組最後 東區第13
The third worst team in the NBA has a 46.9 percent chance at a top three pick
and a 15.6 percent chance at the No. 1 overall. The fourth worst team has
37.8 chance at the top three and an 11.9 percent chance at No. 1. And if the
Sixers finish one game ahead of the Celtics, as not-quite-logical as it might
be, Danny Ainge will look back at that Turner buzzer beater and thank God.
Sixers GM Sam Hinkie will curse its existence.
談談選秀好了
球隊戰績最糟第三隊 有46.9% 抽1-3順位 第四名也有37.8%抽1-3順位
And OK, I know. There’s a lot of assuming going on right now. There’s just
as good a chance that you’ll never think about Turner’s buzzer beater again
for as long as you live. But you never know:
Earlier this football season — it was Week 10, when the Vikings hosted the
Redskins — I remember reading a story about a similar situation that still
haunts Minnesota to this day.
It was Christmas Eve 2011, and the Vikings (2-12) were in Washington. This
was the game Adrian Peterson tore his ACL, and shortly after that, starting
quarterback Christian Ponder was knocked out with an injury.
It looked like another Vikings loss until back-up QB Joe Webb (who’s since
been converted to a receiver) came in out of nowhere, led Minnesota on three
touchdown-scoring drives and pulled out the win. For a moment, it was a lot
of fun. A great victory during a Vikings season that didn’t have many.
However, that one shining moment cost Minnesota the No. 2 pick in the NFL
draft, which means it cost them Robert Griffin III. (And a potentially
devastating RGIII/AP read-option backfield.) Or, seeing how they just drafted
Ponder, that win cost Minnesota an opportunity to cash in on the No. 2 pick
like the Rams did. St. Louis got three firsts and a second-rounder for
Griffin, and thanks to how bad Washington was this season, one of those first
rounders is this year’s No. 2 overall.
Instead of that bounty, the Vikings swapped their No. 3 overall pick with
Cleveland for the No. 4 overall, plus a fourth, fifth and seventh rounder.
They selected OL Matt Kalil at No. 4, and to his credit, Kalil has been
solid. He made the Pro Bowl as a rookie and hasn’t missed a game in two
years.
But while he was a nice consolation prize, that one random Joe Webb miracle
still cost the Vikings so much opportunity, flexibility and potential. More
than two years later, they haven’t forgotten about it.
And for my part, I haven’t forgotten the many, many differences between
football and basketball and the NFL and NBA Drafts. I know it’s not the same
exact thing. Or even close. But depending on how things play out, Turner’s
shot could certainly leave the same ripple effect through Celtics and Sixers
history as Webb’s performance did for the Vikings, Rams and Redskins.
講選秀 美式足球 BALABALA....
Or maybe it won’t. Who knows?
In the meantime, I think I’d rather spend the afternoon thinking about how
that buzzer beater might give the Celtics a better draft pick as opposed to
the fact that it put a stamp on the worst month in franchise history.
換個想法 下午的那顆壓哨球 或許是帶給綠軍 更好的選秀權
而不只是貼一個隊史最糟的標籤而已
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 173.11.82.122
推
01/31 07:09, , 1F
01/31 07:09, 1F
推
01/31 07:14, , 2F
01/31 07:14, 2F
→
01/31 07:14, , 3F
01/31 07:14, 3F
推
01/31 07:36, , 4F
01/31 07:36, 4F
推
01/31 08:03, , 5F
01/31 08:03, 5F
推
01/31 08:12, , 6F
01/31 08:12, 6F
→
01/31 08:57, , 7F
01/31 08:57, 7F
推
01/31 09:21, , 8F
01/31 09:21, 8F
→
01/31 09:22, , 9F
01/31 09:22, 9F
推
01/31 10:01, , 10F
01/31 10:01, 10F
推
01/31 10:28, , 11F
01/31 10:28, 11F
→
01/31 10:28, , 12F
01/31 10:28, 12F
推
01/31 12:51, , 13F
01/31 12:51, 13F
推
01/31 15:11, , 14F
01/31 15:11, 14F
→
01/31 15:12, , 15F
01/31 15:12, 15F
推
01/31 15:39, , 16F
01/31 15:39, 16F
→
01/31 18:49, , 17F
01/31 18:49, 17F
推
02/01 03:39, , 18F
02/01 03:39, 18F
推
02/01 21:53, , 19F
02/01 21:53, 19F
推
02/02 11:26, , 20F
02/02 11:26, 20F
推
02/02 12:35, , 21F
02/02 12:35, 21F
推
02/02 12:50, , 22F
02/02 12:50, 22F
推
02/02 13:01, , 23F
02/02 13:01, 23F
→
02/02 13:02, , 24F
02/02 13:02, 24F
推
02/02 13:04, , 25F
02/02 13:04, 25F
→
02/02 13:05, , 26F
02/02 13:05, 26F
推
02/02 13:05, , 27F
02/02 13:05, 27F
→
02/02 13:06, , 28F
02/02 13:06, 28F
→
02/02 13:07, , 29F
02/02 13:07, 29F
→
02/02 13:08, , 30F
02/02 13:08, 30F
→
02/02 13:09, , 31F
02/02 13:09, 31F
→
02/02 13:09, , 32F
02/02 13:09, 32F
→
02/02 13:10, , 33F
02/02 13:10, 33F
→
02/02 13:10, , 34F
02/02 13:10, 34F
→
02/02 13:11, , 35F
02/02 13:11, 35F
→
02/02 13:11, , 36F
02/02 13:11, 36F
→
02/02 13:11, , 37F
02/02 13:11, 37F
→
02/02 13:12, , 38F
02/02 13:12, 38F
→
02/02 13:12, , 39F
02/02 13:12, 39F
→
02/02 13:15, , 40F
02/02 13:15, 40F
推
02/02 13:15, , 41F
02/02 13:15, 41F
→
02/02 13:15, , 42F
02/02 13:15, 42F
→
02/02 13:19, , 43F
02/02 13:19, 43F
→
02/02 13:19, , 44F
02/02 13:19, 44F