[討論] Clips Flirting With Byran Scott

看板Celtics作者 (粉色的青蛙)時間11年前 (2013/06/23 23:03), 編輯推噓5(507)
留言12則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Here's your Saturday update on the Doc Rivers saga: According to Mark Heisler, The Clippers are reportedly moving closer to financial terms with coaching candidate Byron Scott (4 years, $16-20M) with Brian Shaw still in the mix, in the neighborhood of 3 years and $9M. Nearing a deal with either one severs as both a conter-move to Rivers' ostensible declaration of disinterest in the Clipper job yesterday and a hedge against it actually being true. 據報導,快艇正與Byron Scott、Brian Shaw接洽。 The Clippers almost certainly still favor Rivers (and, of course, Kevin Garnett ,who only comes as part of the package for the head coach) but remain unwilling to give up a first round pick, particularly one in the rich 2014 draft. This despite it being the final piece of a puzzle that would allow them to fortify their team for a championship run next season. 快艇仍然比較偏好河流(還有KG,這筆交易唯一一名賽爾提克球員),但不願意給出 第一輪的選秀權,尤其是明年是選秀大年。但這將會是下一季爭冠的最後一片拼圖 As we’ve recently learned, Rivers did not create these trade talks by asking for a move to the Clippers. Danny Ainge was the one who conceptualized the Doc-to-LA trade and brought it to his head coach, when it became clear the Clippers had interest in his coach. 河流並沒有私下與快艇交涉,這筆交易案全權都是由安吉負責。 We know the Celtics’ clear preference is to retool, which would mean the departures of Garnett and Paul Pierce, however Mark Murphy of the Boston Herald has a source indicating that Garnett could return to Boston next season. That wouldn’t happen without Rivers also returning, something he is reportedly considering this weekend. 據說KG下一季會回來打,前提是河流也要回來。 Who has the leverage right now? It’s hard to tell. The Celtics do not want to pay an ambivalent Rivers $7M next season but should he return to broadcasting, they wouldn’t have to. And they’d still retain the right to compensation should he wish to coach elsewhere in the next three years. They will not let him go for free. So the Clippers’ leverage on that front is blunted. The Clippers remain beholden to Chris Paul, but may already have assurances he’d be willing to play for Scott, even if he’d prefer Rivers. One interesting consideration: what is Ainge’s B-plan if he can’t close this deal with the Clippers? Is it to return the same core? Perhaps that’s something he’d consider if Rivers agrees to return. Or would he move Pierce and, by extension, force Garnett and Rivers into even more difficult decisions than they face now? 如果這筆交易失敗了,下一步安吉會怎麼做呢?用同一包跟別隊交易嗎?還是連Pierce一起 帶上呢? 心得: 雖然收視率比魔獸低,但波士頓肥皂劇,讓我們繼續看下去。 -- 推 sdfsonic:五樓小實的老公 06/27 17:13 → sdfsonic:蓋 06/27 17:13 → sdfsonic:蓋 06/27 17:13 → sdfsonic:蓋 06/27 17:13 推 realion:^^ 06/27 17:13 → sdfsonic:小實是我的!! 06/27 17:13 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.34.163.160

06/23 23:11, , 1F
原定召開的說明會就是在美國時間週一舉行嘛 很期待
06/23 23:11, 1F

06/23 23:13, , 2F
這是一個很微妙的狀況,河流非經母隊允許沒有權利
06/23 23:13, 2F

06/23 23:13, , 3F
回來打一打,把氣氛帶回來阿!也是榮退了
06/23 23:13, 3F

06/23 23:13, , 4F
與快艇接洽,而Ainge非經Doc授權不能繼續與快艇談判
06/23 23:13, 4F

06/23 23:13, , 5F
之後給年輕人去大混戰,也別有一番風味
06/23 23:13, 5F

06/23 23:14, , 6F
所以兩人一開始必須坐下來把整件事情理一遍,然後
06/23 23:14, 6F

06/23 23:15, , 7F
Ainge跟快艇談交易,Doc跟快艇談教驗合約
06/23 23:15, 7F

06/23 23:15, , 8F
現在事情搞得這麼複雜,他們也必須一起坐下來面對
06/23 23:15, 8F

06/23 23:15, , 9F
記者的詢問了。
06/23 23:15, 9F

06/23 23:16, , 10F
拖好久了..
06/23 23:16, 10F

06/23 23:17, , 11F
既然Longabardi已經跟太陽談好合約了,我猜Doc很有
06/23 23:17, 11F

06/23 23:17, , 12F
可能選擇先放下戰術版一陣子
06/23 23:17, 12F
文章代碼(AID): #1HnmvN3G (Celtics)