[外電] Green對C's有多重要?(下)
看板Celtics作者piercepaul (Be a Green Forever&ever)時間13年前 (2012/10/10 16:40)推噓10(10推 0噓 5→)留言15則, 10人參與討論串1/1
新聞出處(必填):
http://ppt.cc/Y9pJ
NOT IMPORTANT
Jeff Green was always somewhat of an enigmatic player. Since his days with
the Oklahoma City Thunder, people questioned what his role actually was.
他不重要
Green總被認為是個謎樣般的球員。在OKC時人們就納悶他扮演的
角色究竟為何。
He always had potential as a scorer. In his sophomore season, he scored 16.5
points per game on 44 percent shooting from the field, along with 6.7
rebounds a night.
他一直都有潛力當個得分手。入行第二年,場均得分為16.5,有
著四成四的命中率,並能抓下6.7個板子。
But we haven’t seen that version of Jeff Green since. That’s part of the
reason why the Oklahoma City Thunder traded him to the Boston Celtics in the
first place. They eventually lost faith in Green.
但從此之後我們就沒看過這樣的他...。這也是OKC交易他的理由
之一。他們終究也對Green失去信念。
The Celtics saw enough to give him a fat contract extension, and while I
believe he’s highly overvalued here, that’s not our question.
而C's 認為他夠格拿這肥約,但我認為這合約顯逾其價值,但這
不是我們要討論的。
We are questioning how important Jeff Green is to the Celtics, and I think
his presence is going to be of minimal importance to Boston by season’s end…
maybe even halfway through it.
我們要討論的是Green對C's到底有多重要,而我認為在賽季結束
時他對C's的重要性會變得很小...說不定季中這點就會顯現。
The Celtics have certain roles outlined for Jeff Green. They’d like him to
be a stretch four in certain cases, and would also like him to play the three
in certain spots as well. Their primary goal for him? We can’t be too sure
right now.
C's會要求Green做的不外乎是偶爾打大前鋒,平時就打小前鋒。
但對他首要目標是什麼呢?我們現在還不能太確定。(Doc:Power
3,uptempo 4.)
It looks as if it’d be a mix of both. They believe Green can stretch the
floor offensively and defend most threes in the NBA. I think all of those
hopes are out of Green’s reach.
看來Green可能兩者都得做到。C's相信Green可以延續禁區攻勢
,且能守住NBA的多數小前鋒。我認為這些對Green 的期待都不
是他能做到的。
Throughout his career, Green has always been looked at as a tweener. He was
very good in some spots and very bad in others, up and down to say the least.
綜觀他的生涯,Green 總被視為tweener。某些部分打得很好,
某些部分打得很差,起起伏伏的。
In 2008, according to 82games.com, Green’s PER was 15.5 in both the power
forward and small forward spots. His opponent’s PER, on average, was 16.5 at
small forward and 18.0 at power forward. He was outperformed at both
positions and ended up having a negative net PER in both instances.
根據82games.com資料顯示,2008年他3號位及4號位兼算的PER
是15.5。他的對手PER值平均,3號位是16.5,4號位是18 。即
便他打兩個位置佔有優勢,但PER值顯示是相當負面的。
In 2010 with Boston, it was much of the same, although he did step it up
defensively versus small forwards. He had a PER of 13.3 as a small forward –
which is below average – and a 12.6 PER as a power forward.
10年來到C's 也差不多,雖然他在防守小前鋒時有挺身而出。
這年他打小前鋒的PER是13.3 (低於平均值),且打大前鋒時是
12.6。
Green did hold small forwards to a PER of 7.8 in his short stint with Boston
that season, while power forwards had a PER of 15.9 against him.
Green在那年短暫跟C's相處的狀況下確實Hold住了對手小前鋒
讓他們得到的PER值是7.8,但面對他的大前鋒卻能拿到15.9。
So while Green may be a player that is able to play more than one position on
the court, he hasn’t been able to do it particularly well. It’s still
fairly early in his career and he can correct this. It’ll take some good
coaching and a confidence boost, but it’s possible.
所以即便Green 可以在場上打多重位置,他也無法做得特別好
。不過他還年輕,有足夠時間去修正。這需要一些正確的指導
及給予足夠的信心,但這是可能發生的。
I still believe Green is overvalued here and isn’t as important as some
believe in Boston. He’s going to have a lot to prove this year, so we’ll
find out soon.
我依舊認為Green的價值被高估了,且對C's並不是那麼重要。
這年他有很多事需要去證明,我們很快就會知道了。
---
NBA官網現正票選今年哪三個球員對C's來說是最重要的,這三個球
員分別為Green,Sully及Darko。
---
Green這兩場高光
http://ppt.cc/Xyqf
http://ppt.cc/x~qf
http://instagram.com/p/Qk5iYahIKj/
---
http://ppt.cc/3aCw
Jeff Green: "I gotta be a leader. I gotta be able to play both ends,
lead by example. I gotta learn from the guys ahead of me. I have future
Hall of Famers in front of me to learn from:[Kevin Garnett] and Paul [Pierce].
There's a future Hall of Famer in [Rajon] Rondo and [Jason Terry]. I have
a lot of people to look up to as far as leadership. So far through two games
i think i'm doing a good job."
有翻錯的地方請不吝指正Orz
--
It start with 6,then 17 ,then 33 ,then 34 ,then 9.
It's all about Pride and Responsibility.
And the Cigar.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.172.68.209
推
10/10 16:47, , 1F
10/10 16:47, 1F
推
10/10 16:50, , 2F
10/10 16:50, 2F
→
10/10 16:50, , 3F
10/10 16:50, 3F
推
10/10 16:51, , 4F
10/10 16:51, 4F
→
10/10 16:51, , 5F
10/10 16:51, 5F
推
10/10 16:56, , 6F
10/10 16:56, 6F
※ 編輯: piercepaul 來自: 1.172.68.209 (10/10 17:21)
推
10/10 17:20, , 7F
10/10 17:20, 7F
推
10/10 17:45, , 8F
10/10 17:45, 8F
推
10/10 18:30, , 9F
10/10 18:30, 9F
推
10/10 19:46, , 10F
10/10 19:46, 10F
→
10/10 19:47, , 11F
10/10 19:47, 11F
→
10/10 19:47, , 12F
10/10 19:47, 12F
推
10/10 20:32, , 13F
10/10 20:32, 13F
→
10/10 21:37, , 14F
10/10 21:37, 14F
推
10/10 21:43, , 15F
10/10 21:43, 15F