[外電] Ainge: Green Was Celtics' Most Effic …
Ainge: Green Was Celtics' Most Efficient Postseason Scorer
May 16, 2011 10:33 AM EDT
Danny Ainge joined The Big Show on WEEI in Boston to discuss among other things
Jeff Green’s play and his future role with the Celtics.
Ainge參加電台節目WEEI時討論到Green的表現及在老賽的未來定位。
Asked about the Kendrick Perkins trade and his assessment of Green’s
performance during the playoffs, Ainge said:
在被問到KP的交易及Green在季後賽的表現時,Ainge表示:
"Kendrick wasn’t someone who really helped our offense. He has never been that
type of player. He’s been a player that’s helped our defense. Our defense was
not the problem. That was the first thing in my opinion.
"首先我的看法是,KP一直不是能夠幫助我們進攻的球員,他能幫助我們的防守,但我想我
們的防守沒有甚麼問題。
"I think Jeff Green showed in the time he was called upon especially when he
was needed to play more minutes he played very well and was very productive.
As a matter of fact he was our most efficient offensive player throughout the
playoffs on points per possession.
"我想Green在上場時,特別是當他需要在場上久一點時,他表現得很好也很有效率,事實上
他是我們在季後賽的進攻效率最好的球員。
"Jeff played a limited role. I think a lot of people expected maybe to play a
greater role, but when you’re playing behind KG, Ray, and Paul there’s not a
lot of opportunities and when you are on the court sometimes…we found he
played really well when there were two or three starters on the court with him.
He played worse with all of our bench players on the court, which I think is
understandable."
"Green在場上發揮了有限的作用,我想大多數人期待他可以發揮得更好,但當你跟KG、Ray
、PP一起在場上時,你有時不會得到很多表現的機會,我們發現當他跟2-3名先發球員在場上
時他表現得不錯,而當他跟我們的替補在場上時則表現得比較糟糕,我想這是可以理解的。"
新聞出處(必填):RealGm http://tinyurl.com/65yguue
作者:Via Sports Radio Interviews
--
不過大寶跟三老頭同時在場上時機會卻很多?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.254.112.248
※ 編輯: arShawn 來自: 111.254.112.248 (05/17 05:51)
※ 編輯: arShawn 來自: 111.254.112.248 (05/17 05:51)
※ 編輯: arShawn 來自: 111.254.112.248 (05/17 05:52)
推
05/17 05:55, , 1F
05/17 05:55, 1F
→
05/17 06:01, , 2F
05/17 06:01, 2F
推
05/17 08:29, , 3F
05/17 08:29, 3F
推
05/17 08:32, , 4F
05/17 08:32, 4F
推
05/17 10:02, , 5F
05/17 10:02, 5F
推
05/17 10:54, , 6F
05/17 10:54, 6F
推
05/17 11:01, , 7F
05/17 11:01, 7F
推
05/17 12:17, , 8F
05/17 12:17, 8F
→
05/17 13:58, , 9F
05/17 13:58, 9F
→
05/17 13:58, , 10F
05/17 13:58, 10F
推
05/17 14:08, , 11F
05/17 14:08, 11F
推
05/17 22:01, , 12F
05/17 22:01, 12F
→
05/18 16:12, , 13F
05/18 16:12, 13F
推
05/18 20:49, , 14F
05/18 20:49, 14F