[外電] Some Love for The Bigs
新聞出處(必填):http://celticshub.com/2010/06/07/some-love-for-the-bigs/
作者:Brian Robb
挑重點說一下
The Celtics starting backcourt has been garnering a lot of attention today.
Something about a triple-double and setting an NBA Finals record for three
pointers made will do that I guess. There is no doubt that the C’s would
have gone nowhere last night without these two leading the ship.
超賽後場贏得大家的注意,不外乎就大三元跟三分紀錄這兩件事
Rajon Rondo was a maestro, the way he controlled game 2 throughout. Ray Allen
would have spotted the Green a double digit 1st half lead if it weren’t for
Boston giving the ball away 11 times in 24 minutes.
Quick sidebar: It’s actually comical now, after the fact to think about, but
did anyone notice Ray’s face during that halftime interview with Doris
Burke. That just shocked look, indicating, “Wait I just had the best
shooting half of my career and we are only up 6? Really?”
In any case, Rondo and Ray were the keys to the win. You don’t need me to
tell you that. There is a part of this roster though that deserves some
credit, after their effort last night and those are the Celtic big men.
Now before you start screaming at your computer, please just hear me out.
Andrew Bynum and Paul Gasol have had two terrific games, eating the C’s up
at seemingly every turn. Some (ok, a lot) falls on our bigs.
However, last night when it mattered, the big guys collectively stood up in
more ways than one, helping the C’s to get over the hump and put away the
Lakers for good. With that in mind, let’s take a look at just how they got
the job done.
Bynum跟Gasol毀了我們的禁區,但我們的大個子最後還是挺了下來
看看他們是怎麼辦到的
Defense
The shooting numbers for the Lakers big men in the fourth quarter:
Gasol: 0/1 FG, 1 point.
Bynum: 1/1 FG, 2 points
Odom: 1/2 FG, 3 points
防守
三塔在第四節DoReMi的得分
Four field goal attempts collectively from the 4 and 5 spots, easily the
Lakers best sources of offense this series. Now, you can blame the LA offense
for not getting the ball to those guys when it mattered down the stretch, but
let’s be fair here.
The C’s frontcourt defense had a lot to do with that reality. Fronting those
guys, denying the ball, and smart positioning by the C’s bigs were a factor
in this equation. Then again, so was Ron Artest’s absurd shot selection. No
matter how you slice it though, the C’s front line did their job on the
defensive end when it counted.
In fact, I’m feeling so positive, let’s run through everyone in the
frontcourt to give them their props.
Kendrick Perkins
He may take 3 seconds too long to get most of his shots up, but he still made
the most of them in game 2. 12 points from Perk is nothing to sneeze at, it
was his highest number of these playoffs since game 2 of the Miami series.
The C’s record when Perk scores 10 or more points these playoffs? 5-0.
4 of 7 from the field, a even more impressive 4 of 6 from the free throw
line, perhaps, most importantly 0 technicals during the evening. Thanks Ken
Mauer for not calling a double T in the 2nd quarter when Perk got mixed with
someone on an inbounds play. That was easily the best call you made during a
very tough night for the whistleblowers.
臭臉12分好像沒什麼,但他得超過10分的季後賽,超賽成績是5-0
Rasheed Wallace
The man is gutting it out right now. You have to admire that. 7 points and 7
rebounds in 18 very efficient minutes, to go along with a +15 to lead the
team in plus/minus. He’s using his length and smarts, something this team
desperately needs against the immense size the Lakers have up front. Here’s
hoping the plane ride home today didn’t make the back act up too much.
季後賽才打卡的阿伯,非常有效率的18分鐘得了7分7籃板,+/-是+15
Glen Davis
Aggressive. Relentless. So many words can be used to describe this man’s
effort. There’s one sequence though that sums up this man’s fight in game
2. With about 8 minutes left in the fourth quarter, he rebounded a Tony Allen
missed layup and was blocked. He gathered himself, and got 2 more offensive
rebounds right away. Both were swatted away. Celtics came up empty.
On the very NEXT possession, the C’s go down low to Davis on the block, and
he hits a 3 foot hook shot over Lamar Odom. A lot of guys would be
discouraged about being stuffed into oblivion a possession earlier. Not Big
Baby. Despite an all around off shooting night, (4 of 13 from field) you have
to give it up to a guy who keeps at it like that.
燃燒小宇宙的大寶,很多人被蓋完就縮起來了,但大寶是拼了命換小勾射上
Shelden Williams
Who are we kidding here, I have nothing positive to say about Shelden’s
performance last night, except for the fact it increases the odds of Brian
Scalabrine dressing for game 3. Let’s move on…..
對山東的表現我們還是期待榮恩好了
Kevin Garnett
Game 1, it was an off night. Most of game 2 it was foul trouble. He had no
rhythm last night, and whispers of him being “washed up” are getting louder
and louder. No, he’s not the same player he was 2 years ago. He still helps
his team win though when it matters. Again, I point to the fourth quarter.
12 minutes, 1 of 2 FG, 3 assists, 4 points, and one monster pick that freed
up Rajon Rondo for a wide open layup to give the C’s a 95-90 lead. KG wasn’
t on last night offensively, only taking 6 baskets, but make no mistake he
helped The Green in many other ways.
On defense, distributing the ball, (6 assists on night), setting the picks.
It may not have been pretty, and watching him rebound the ball this series
has been painful. The Big Ticket continues to fight though and last night he
helped his team win.
前兩場比賽我們都知道這已經不是兩年前的KG了,
但他還是能幫助球隊贏球,KG還是很努力幫助球隊贏得勝利
Now, Boston is heading home for three games, where the Celtic big men play
best. Scoring for Pau Gasol and Andrew Bynum won’t be as easy at the Garden,
they will be out of their comfort zones. Which side steps up in game 3 will
have a huge say in determining who grabs a stranglehold on this series.
回到家的禁區就不是那麼容易可以讓他們肆虐了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.166.122.22
推
06/08 20:52, , 1F
06/08 20:52, 1F
推
06/08 21:04, , 2F
06/08 21:04, 2F
推
06/08 21:22, , 3F
06/08 21:22, 3F
推
06/08 22:18, , 4F
06/08 22:18, 4F
推
06/08 22:25, , 5F
06/08 22:25, 5F
推
06/08 23:13, , 6F
06/08 23:13, 6F
→
06/08 23:13, , 7F
06/08 23:13, 7F
推
06/08 23:37, , 8F
06/08 23:37, 8F
→
06/08 23:38, , 9F
06/08 23:38, 9F
→
06/09 00:19, , 10F
06/09 00:19, 10F
→
06/09 00:19, , 11F
06/09 00:19, 11F
→
12/10 12:47,
5年前
, 12F
12/10 12:47, 12F
→
04/18 21:00,
5年前
, 13F
04/18 21:00, 13F