Re: [討論] 台灣小說的質量不如中國,日本的原因??已回收
抱歉我又要離題了
這串評估的是台灣輕小說的整體品質對吧?
我本身基本上沒在看輕小
所以能否有人以回文的方式來整理一下
目前台灣哪些輕小很優,值得推薦,但在哪些方面還是比別人差一點
哪些輕小很毒,毒到比之前那個進步500年還有問題
我知道鬼島問題很多,但是這串看了一段時間
我總覺得這好像是直接定義結論(鬼島比人爛),開始探討原因
然後鮮少有案例佐證?
不能把幾個有名的(如九把刀、噩盡島、御我)當成全部吧?
就像不能說Square Enix前幾年的RPG很普 = JRPG已死一樣
我不希望好作品連看都沒看過就得被蓋章
老一輩的人已經蓋我們這輩太多章,讓人覺得煩躁又胡鬧
我們就別自己再蓋自己章了吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 139.223.31.185
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1445233557.A.2FC.html
推
10/19 13:47, , 1F
10/19 13:47, 1F
→
10/19 13:47, , 2F
10/19 13:47, 2F
推
10/19 13:47, , 3F
10/19 13:47, 3F
→
10/19 13:49, , 4F
10/19 13:49, 4F
→
10/19 13:50, , 5F
10/19 13:50, 5F
→
10/19 13:51, , 6F
10/19 13:51, 6F
→
10/19 13:52, , 7F
10/19 13:52, 7F
推
10/19 13:53, , 8F
10/19 13:53, 8F
推
10/19 13:53, , 9F
10/19 13:53, 9F
推
10/19 13:53, , 10F
10/19 13:53, 10F
→
10/19 13:54, , 11F
10/19 13:54, 11F
推
10/19 13:54, , 12F
10/19 13:54, 12F
推
10/19 13:54, , 13F
10/19 13:54, 13F
→
10/19 13:55, , 14F
10/19 13:55, 14F
→
10/19 13:59, , 15F
10/19 13:59, 15F
→
10/19 13:59, , 16F
10/19 13:59, 16F
→
10/19 13:59, , 17F
10/19 13:59, 17F
→
10/19 14:00, , 18F
10/19 14:00, 18F
→
10/19 14:00, , 19F
10/19 14:00, 19F
推
10/19 14:03, , 20F
10/19 14:03, 20F
推
10/19 14:05, , 21F
10/19 14:05, 21F
→
10/19 14:05, , 22F
10/19 14:05, 22F
推
10/19 14:11, , 23F
10/19 14:11, 23F
→
10/19 14:12, , 24F
10/19 14:12, 24F
→
10/19 14:13, , 25F
10/19 14:13, 25F
→
10/19 14:14, , 26F
10/19 14:14, 26F
→
10/19 14:14, , 27F
10/19 14:14, 27F
→
10/19 14:15, , 28F
10/19 14:15, 28F
→
10/19 14:16, , 29F
10/19 14:16, 29F
→
10/19 14:16, , 30F
10/19 14:16, 30F
推
10/19 14:18, , 31F
10/19 14:18, 31F
→
10/19 14:24, , 32F
10/19 14:24, 32F
→
10/19 14:25, , 33F
10/19 14:25, 33F
→
10/19 14:25, , 34F
10/19 14:25, 34F
→
10/19 14:26, , 35F
10/19 14:26, 35F
→
10/19 14:34, , 36F
10/19 14:34, 36F
推
10/19 14:34, , 37F
10/19 14:34, 37F
→
10/19 14:35, , 38F
10/19 14:35, 38F
→
10/19 14:36, , 39F
10/19 14:36, 39F
→
10/19 14:36, , 40F
10/19 14:36, 40F
→
10/19 14:38, , 41F
10/19 14:38, 41F
→
10/19 14:38, , 42F
10/19 14:38, 42F
推
10/19 14:40, , 43F
10/19 14:40, 43F
→
10/19 14:40, , 44F
10/19 14:40, 44F
推
10/19 14:42, , 45F
10/19 14:42, 45F
→
10/19 14:46, , 46F
10/19 14:46, 46F
→
10/19 14:49, , 47F
10/19 14:49, 47F
→
10/19 14:51, , 48F
10/19 14:51, 48F
→
10/19 14:53, , 49F
10/19 14:53, 49F
→
10/19 14:54, , 50F
10/19 14:54, 50F
→
10/19 14:55, , 51F
10/19 14:55, 51F
→
10/19 14:57, , 52F
10/19 14:57, 52F
推
10/19 14:58, , 53F
10/19 14:58, 53F
→
10/19 14:58, , 54F
10/19 14:58, 54F
→
10/19 15:00, , 55F
10/19 15:00, 55F
→
10/19 15:01, , 56F
10/19 15:01, 56F
→
10/19 16:37, , 57F
10/19 16:37, 57F
→
10/19 16:37, , 58F
10/19 16:37, 58F
→
10/19 16:37, , 59F
10/19 16:37, 59F
→
10/19 16:37, , 60F
10/19 16:37, 60F
→
10/19 16:38, , 61F
10/19 16:38, 61F
→
10/19 16:43, , 62F
10/19 16:43, 62F
→
10/19 16:43, , 63F
10/19 16:43, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 15 之 21 篇):