[閒聊] 為什麼戶愚呂弟不交給妖狐藏馬解決?已回收
印象中,戶愚呂弟是B-等級的妖怪,妖狐是A級
當時幽助隊陣中,撇去幽助修煉後的實力未知(實際上最後也只跟戶愚呂弟差不多)
最有把握可以幹掉戶愚呂弟的應該就是妖狐藏馬了吧
而且依照後面等級的表現,A級妖怪清掉B級也是分分秒秒的事情
是有可能在藥效消失前,結束戰鬥的
如果依邏輯,應該是安排由藏馬對戶愚呂弟比較合理!
--
_______
│ x77 │
│ ●●│
│ > │
\_=◎_/ :為什麼這麼年輕的孩子會有肛如此嚴苛的稱號!?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.135.102.129
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1444316033.A.CD3.html
→
10/08 22:54, , 1F
10/08 22:54, 1F
→
10/08 22:54, , 2F
10/08 22:54, 2F
→
10/08 22:54, , 3F
10/08 22:54, 3F
→
10/08 22:55, , 4F
10/08 22:55, 4F
→
10/08 22:55, , 5F
10/08 22:55, 5F
→
10/08 22:55, , 6F
10/08 22:55, 6F
推
10/08 22:55, , 7F
10/08 22:55, 7F
→
10/08 22:55, , 8F
10/08 22:55, 8F
推
10/08 22:55, , 9F
10/08 22:55, 9F
→
10/08 22:55, , 10F
10/08 22:55, 10F
→
10/08 22:56, , 11F
10/08 22:56, 11F
推
10/08 22:56, , 12F
10/08 22:56, 12F
→
10/08 22:57, , 13F
10/08 22:57, 13F
→
10/08 22:57, , 14F
10/08 22:57, 14F
→
10/08 22:58, , 15F
10/08 22:58, 15F
推
10/08 22:58, , 16F
10/08 22:58, 16F
→
10/08 22:58, , 17F
10/08 22:58, 17F
→
10/08 22:58, , 18F
10/08 22:58, 18F
推
10/08 22:59, , 19F
10/08 22:59, 19F
→
10/08 22:59, , 20F
10/08 22:59, 20F
→
10/08 22:59, , 21F
10/08 22:59, 21F
→
10/08 22:59, , 22F
10/08 22:59, 22F
推
10/08 22:59, , 23F
10/08 22:59, 23F
→
10/08 23:00, , 24F
10/08 23:00, 24F
推
10/08 23:00, , 25F
10/08 23:00, 25F
推
10/08 23:01, , 26F
10/08 23:01, 26F
推
10/08 23:01, , 27F
10/08 23:01, 27F
→
10/08 23:02, , 28F
10/08 23:02, 28F
→
10/08 23:02, , 29F
10/08 23:02, 29F
→
10/08 23:02, , 30F
10/08 23:02, 30F
→
10/08 23:02, , 31F
10/08 23:02, 31F
不是吧
記得到仙水篇,會恢復到妖狐應該都是靠藥,不是靠修煉,
所以只是恢復成原本的樣子,沒有增強或減弱,
所以仙水篇的實力應該跟武鬥大賽時一樣的
至於會跟鴉打這麼久,好像是妖狐在玩吧
印象中打得過程中,妖狐有說再玩久一點吧
※ 編輯: x77 (220.135.102.129), 10/08/2015 23:08:09
推
10/08 23:13, , 32F
10/08 23:13, 32F
→
10/08 23:15, , 33F
10/08 23:15, 33F
→
10/08 23:15, , 34F
10/08 23:15, 34F
→
10/08 23:15, , 35F
10/08 23:15, 35F
推
10/08 23:16, , 36F
10/08 23:16, 36F
→
10/08 23:17, , 37F
10/08 23:17, 37F
→
10/08 23:18, , 38F
10/08 23:18, 38F
→
10/08 23:18, , 39F
10/08 23:18, 39F
→
10/08 23:20, , 40F
10/08 23:20, 40F
→
10/08 23:20, , 41F
10/08 23:20, 41F
→
10/08 23:20, , 42F
10/08 23:20, 42F
推
10/08 23:21, , 43F
10/08 23:21, 43F
→
10/08 23:21, , 44F
10/08 23:21, 44F
→
10/08 23:22, , 45F
10/08 23:22, 45F
→
10/08 23:22, , 46F
10/08 23:22, 46F
→
10/08 23:24, , 47F
10/08 23:24, 47F
→
10/08 23:25, , 48F
10/08 23:25, 48F
推
10/08 23:25, , 49F
10/08 23:25, 49F
推
10/08 23:26, , 50F
10/08 23:26, 50F
→
10/08 23:26, , 51F
10/08 23:26, 51F
→
10/08 23:27, , 52F
10/08 23:27, 52F
→
10/08 23:28, , 53F
10/08 23:28, 53F
推
10/08 23:28, , 54F
10/08 23:28, 54F
→
10/08 23:32, , 55F
10/08 23:32, 55F
推
10/08 23:36, , 56F
10/08 23:36, 56F
推
10/08 23:49, , 57F
10/08 23:49, 57F
推
10/08 23:54, , 58F
10/08 23:54, 58F
推
10/08 23:55, , 59F
10/08 23:55, 59F
→
10/08 23:56, , 60F
10/08 23:56, 60F
→
10/08 23:56, , 61F
10/08 23:56, 61F
→
10/08 23:57, , 62F
10/08 23:57, 62F
→
10/08 23:58, , 63F
10/08 23:58, 63F
→
10/08 23:58, , 64F
10/08 23:58, 64F
推
10/09 09:46, , 65F
10/09 09:46, 65F
推
10/09 09:56, , 66F
10/09 09:56, 66F
推
10/09 11:03, , 67F
10/09 11:03, 67F
→
10/09 17:02, , 68F
10/09 17:02, 68F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):