[討論] 關於鋼彈SEED中核彈的問題消失
照理來說
核武做為最高規格的毀滅武器並不為過
在亞金.度維攻防戰中也證明了核武對於宇宙要塞及艦隊的毀滅性殺傷力
但處在開戰初期就握有中子干擾消除器(或是已接近開發完成)
的ZAFT似乎並沒有動過使用核彈的念頭
使的開戰後快一年了聯邦軍在宇宙還有相當可觀的戰力
要知道之前的世界樹大戰中地球方也才投入了三個艦隊
但在掩護大天使號下降時可是整整一個艦隊,再加上月球基地和其他保留的軍力
ZAFT的宇宙優勢並沒有壓倒性的大
還蠻搞不懂為何ZAFT沒在一年的時間裡用核彈對地球方的宇宙軍清場
導致地球宇宙軍留下不少軍力日後扯後腿
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.231.241.112
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1431625951.A.1FD.html
推
05/15 01:54, , 1F
05/15 01:54, 1F
→
05/15 01:55, , 2F
05/15 01:55, 2F
要知道一點 開戰的導火線是地球方先用核彈打民用殖民衛星
開戰後用核彈反轟軍事目標相信並不為過
地球上姑且不論
連宇宙裡都不用這種可以減少己方的死人數的方法....是蠻不可思議ZAFT沒這樣搞
※ 編輯: jamie81416 (36.231.241.112), 05/15/2015 02:00:11
推
05/15 01:57, , 3F
05/15 01:57, 3F
也難說 艦隊戰中放核彈造成的瞬間輻射量可是足夠讓聯邦軍艦隊喝一壺的
→
05/15 01:59, , 4F
05/15 01:59, 4F
推
05/15 01:59, , 5F
05/15 01:59, 5F
→
05/15 01:59, , 6F
05/15 01:59, 6F
推
05/15 02:00, , 7F
05/15 02:00, 7F
→
05/15 02:00, , 8F
05/15 02:00, 8F
那這樣故事中後期搞出Justice,Freedom兩台機體的ZAFT腦代真的是被門夾到
※ 編輯: jamie81416 (36.231.241.112), 05/15/2015 02:04:42
推
05/15 02:03, , 9F
05/15 02:03, 9F
推
05/15 02:03, , 10F
05/15 02:03, 10F
推
05/15 02:04, , 11F
05/15 02:04, 11F
→
05/15 02:04, , 12F
05/15 02:04, 12F
→
05/15 02:04, , 13F
05/15 02:04, 13F
→
05/15 02:04, , 14F
05/15 02:04, 14F
→
05/15 02:04, , 15F
05/15 02:04, 15F
→
05/15 02:05, , 16F
05/15 02:05, 16F
→
05/15 02:05, , 17F
05/15 02:05, 17F
→
05/15 02:05, , 18F
05/15 02:05, 18F
→
05/15 02:05, , 19F
05/15 02:05, 19F
從一開始血腥晴人節後就已經是核戰爭
如果不是ZAFT見苗頭不對趕快丟中子干擾器
相不相信剛開戰地球馬上就丟來上百枚核彈
在日後亞金杜維攻防戰中也證實了這點
ZAFT都還沒丟核彈咧
地球軍就興高采烈的放了核彈海
→
05/15 02:06, , 20F
05/15 02:06, 20F
→
05/15 02:06, , 21F
05/15 02:06, 21F
推
05/15 02:07, , 22F
05/15 02:07, 22F
→
05/15 02:07, , 23F
05/15 02:07, 23F
→
05/15 02:07, , 24F
05/15 02:07, 24F
→
05/15 02:08, , 25F
05/15 02:08, 25F
→
05/15 02:08, , 26F
05/15 02:08, 26F
→
05/15 02:08, , 27F
05/15 02:08, 27F
→
05/15 02:08, , 28F
05/15 02:08, 28F
推
05/15 02:09, , 29F
05/15 02:09, 29F
→
05/15 02:09, , 30F
05/15 02:09, 30F
→
05/15 02:09, , 31F
05/15 02:09, 31F
→
05/15 02:09, , 32F
05/15 02:09, 32F
→
05/15 02:09, , 33F
05/15 02:09, 33F
→
05/15 02:09, , 34F
05/15 02:09, 34F
→
05/15 02:09, , 35F
05/15 02:09, 35F
推
05/15 02:10, , 36F
05/15 02:10, 36F
→
05/15 02:10, , 37F
05/15 02:10, 37F
推
05/15 02:11, , 38F
05/15 02:11, 38F
推
05/15 02:12, , 39F
05/15 02:12, 39F
推
05/15 02:13, , 40F
05/15 02:13, 40F
※ 編輯: jamie81416 (36.231.241.112), 05/15/2015 02:15:28
推
05/15 02:16, , 41F
05/15 02:16, 41F
→
05/15 02:18, , 42F
05/15 02:18, 42F
推
05/15 02:18, , 43F
05/15 02:18, 43F
→
05/15 02:19, , 44F
05/15 02:19, 44F
推
05/15 02:22, , 45F
05/15 02:22, 45F
推
05/15 02:58, , 46F
05/15 02:58, 46F
→
05/15 02:58, , 47F
05/15 02:58, 47F
推
05/15 07:43, , 48F
05/15 07:43, 48F
→
05/15 07:44, , 49F
05/15 07:44, 49F
→
05/15 07:45, , 50F
05/15 07:45, 50F
推
05/15 09:30, , 51F
05/15 09:30, 51F
→
05/15 09:30, , 52F
05/15 09:30, 52F
→
05/15 10:18, , 53F
05/15 10:18, 53F
→
05/15 10:19, , 54F
05/15 10:19, 54F
→
05/15 10:19, , 55F
05/15 10:19, 55F
→
05/15 11:06, , 56F
05/15 11:06, 56F
→
05/15 11:06, , 57F
05/15 11:06, 57F
推
05/15 11:22, , 58F
05/15 11:22, 58F
→
05/15 11:22, , 59F
05/15 11:22, 59F
推
05/15 11:45, , 60F
05/15 11:45, 60F
→
05/15 11:45, , 61F
05/15 11:45, 61F
→
05/15 11:45, , 62F
05/15 11:45, 62F
推
05/15 12:02, , 63F
05/15 12:02, 63F
推
05/15 14:00, , 64F
05/15 14:00, 64F
→
05/15 14:00, , 65F
05/15 14:00, 65F
推
05/15 23:21, , 66F
05/15 23:21, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):