[外電] Wang to the Twins makes little sense
看板CMWang作者yyhong68 (come every now and then)時間16年前 (2007/10/24 11:06)推噓43(43推 0噓 5→)留言48則, 46人參與討論串1/1
Wang to the Twins makes little sense
王建民去雙城，幾乎不可行。
One of the rumors going around is that the Yankees could send Chien-Ming Wang
and prospects to Minnesota for Johan Santana.
最近有個謠言一直在傳：洋基交易王建民和一些新秀，換回雙城的山塔納。
Riddle me this, Batman. Why would the Twins want a sinkerball specialist
like Wang? He is 7-3 with a 4.85 ERA in 11 career starts on turf, 39-15, 3.58
on grass.
猜一猜，蝙蝠俠。為什麼雙城會想要一個像王這樣的一個伸卡球高手？
生涯11次在人工草皮先發的成績：七勝三敗，防禦率4.85，
而在天然草地上，39勝15敗，防禦率3.58。
The Twins will be in their park for at least another two years. Add in games
in Toronto and Tampa and Wang would make roughly 19 starts a year on turf.
雙城將還會再使用目前的主場球場至少兩年。加上在多倫多和坦帕灣的比賽，
那大約估計王建民一年將在人工草皮上先發19場。
He’s also arbitration eligible, a huge factor for the penny-pinching Twins.
Why would they want to pay for the success he has had with the Yankees?
同時，他目前已符合仲裁資格，這是一個很重要的因素，對雙城這樣小球團。
為什麼他們要為他（王）在洋基所做的成就而付出呢？
I don’t see how that trade makes much sense. The Yankees have the pieces to
make a deal with the Twins if they want, but Wang makes little sense to
Minnesota.
我（彼得亞伯拉罕）看不出這個交易有什麼道理。若雙城想要交易，洋基有交易的籌碼，
但就王建民到雙城這件事而言，對雙城而言，沒什麼道理。
http://yankees.lohudblogs.com/2007/10/23/wang-to-the-twins-makes-little-sense/
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.109.23.54
推
10/24 11:08, , 1F
10/24 11:08, 1F
推
10/24 11:57, , 2F
10/24 11:57, 2F
推
10/24 12:04, , 3F
10/24 12:04, 3F
推
10/24 12:13, , 4F
10/24 12:13, 4F
推
10/24 12:21, , 5F
10/24 12:21, 5F
推
10/24 12:35, , 6F
10/24 12:35, 6F
推
10/24 12:44, , 7F
10/24 12:44, 7F
推
10/24 12:43, , 8F
10/24 12:43, 8F
→
10/24 12:44, , 9F
10/24 12:44, 9F
推
10/24 12:55, , 10F
10/24 12:55, 10F
推
10/24 12:58, , 11F
10/24 12:58, 11F
推
10/24 13:07, , 12F
10/24 13:07, 12F
推
10/24 13:13, , 13F
10/24 13:13, 13F
推
10/24 13:16, , 14F
10/24 13:16, 14F
推
10/24 13:44, , 15F
10/24 13:44, 15F
推
10/24 13:44, , 16F
10/24 13:44, 16F
推
10/24 13:47, , 17F
10/24 13:47, 17F
推
10/24 13:58, , 18F
10/24 13:58, 18F
推
10/24 14:13, , 19F
10/24 14:13, 19F
推
10/24 14:25, , 20F
10/24 14:25, 20F
推
10/24 14:26, , 21F
10/24 14:26, 21F
推
10/24 14:41, , 22F
10/24 14:41, 22F
推
10/24 14:58, , 23F
10/24 14:58, 23F
→
10/24 15:19, , 24F
10/24 15:19, 24F
推
10/24 15:22, , 25F
10/24 15:22, 25F
推
10/24 17:05, , 26F
10/24 17:05, 26F
推
10/24 17:15, , 27F
10/24 17:15, 27F
推
10/24 17:24, , 28F
10/24 17:24, 28F
推
10/24 18:04, , 29F
10/24 18:04, 29F
推
10/24 18:37, , 30F
10/24 18:37, 30F
推
10/24 18:48, , 31F
10/24 18:48, 31F
推
10/24 18:57, , 32F
10/24 18:57, 32F
→
10/24 19:43, , 33F
10/24 19:43, 33F
推
10/24 19:54, , 34F
10/24 19:54, 34F
推
10/24 21:28, , 35F
10/24 21:28, 35F
推
10/24 22:50, , 36F
10/24 22:50, 36F
推
10/24 23:02, , 37F
10/24 23:02, 37F
推
10/25 01:06, , 38F
10/25 01:06, 38F
推
10/25 02:36, , 39F
10/25 02:36, 39F
推
10/25 12:14, , 40F
10/25 12:14, 40F
推
10/25 12:25, , 41F
10/25 12:25, 41F
推
10/25 13:48, , 42F
10/25 13:48, 42F
推
10/25 13:55, , 43F
10/25 13:55, 43F
→
10/25 22:52, , 44F
10/25 22:52, 44F
→
10/26 11:08, , 45F
10/26 11:08, 45F
推
10/26 11:21, , 46F
10/26 11:21, 46F
推
10/26 16:07, , 47F
10/26 16:07, 47F
推
10/26 22:55, , 48F
10/26 22:55, 48F