[討論] 誅仙當年真的有那麼強嗎
先說我看網路小說是這幾年才開始的,所以誅仙當年連載時的情況並不清楚。
會有這個問題是因為看起點的娛樂小說(尤其是在以前的香港發展),每個主角
幾乎都是靠寫小說起家,而且不是寫鐵血天驕/崑崙就是寫誅仙。然後金庸看
到後大為讚賞在他的報紙上推薦,主角就大紅大紫起來。
但這邊我的疑問就來了,鳳歌被譽為後金庸时代挑大梁者,自然作品評價不錯
,會被金庸賞識還算可以理解(畢竟在那些武俠大家之後硬要找個新一代接班人
,選鳳歌算是ok)。
但起點娛樂小說的「寫武俠小說然後出名」橋段,除了崑崙之外通常選的都是
誅仙,這就讓我疑問了──誅仙當年真的有這麼強嗎?
強到每個寫娛樂小說的寫手,都覺得回到過去寫誅仙就能大紅大紫、紅遍兩岸
三地,然後還能被金庸誇獎等等。
當年誅仙真的這麼猛?還是只是起點寫手的幻想?(不過能讓每個寫娛樂的都選
誅仙來做為劇情,應該有其參考性吧)
因為那時候我還沒開始看網路小說,關於這點實在很好奇。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 106.1.58.158
推
08/31 21:18, , 1F
08/31 21:18, 1F
→
08/31 21:19, , 2F
08/31 21:19, 2F
→
08/31 21:21, , 3F
08/31 21:21, 3F
推
08/31 21:25, , 4F
08/31 21:25, 4F
推
08/31 21:28, , 5F
08/31 21:28, 5F
推
08/31 21:29, , 6F
08/31 21:29, 6F
→
08/31 21:29, , 7F
08/31 21:29, 7F
→
08/31 21:29, , 8F
08/31 21:29, 8F
→
08/31 21:30, , 9F
08/31 21:30, 9F
→
08/31 21:32, , 10F
08/31 21:32, 10F
推
08/31 21:33, , 11F
08/31 21:33, 11F
推
08/31 21:38, , 12F
08/31 21:38, 12F
推
08/31 21:43, , 13F
08/31 21:43, 13F
推
08/31 21:47, , 14F
08/31 21:47, 14F
推
08/31 21:47, , 15F
08/31 21:47, 15F
推
08/31 21:50, , 16F
08/31 21:50, 16F
推
08/31 21:50, , 17F
08/31 21:50, 17F
→
08/31 21:51, , 18F
08/31 21:51, 18F
推
08/31 21:53, , 19F
08/31 21:53, 19F
推
08/31 21:54, , 20F
08/31 21:54, 20F
推
08/31 22:03, , 21F
08/31 22:03, 21F
推
08/31 22:05, , 22F
08/31 22:05, 22F
→
08/31 22:05, , 23F
08/31 22:05, 23F
推
08/31 22:08, , 24F
08/31 22:08, 24F
推
08/31 22:10, , 25F
08/31 22:10, 25F
→
08/31 22:10, , 26F
08/31 22:10, 26F
→
08/31 22:10, , 27F
08/31 22:10, 27F
→
08/31 22:12, , 28F
08/31 22:12, 28F
→
08/31 22:13, , 29F
08/31 22:13, 29F
→
08/31 22:21, , 30F
08/31 22:21, 30F
→
08/31 22:21, , 31F
08/31 22:21, 31F
→
08/31 22:22, , 32F
08/31 22:22, 32F
推
08/31 22:27, , 33F
08/31 22:27, 33F
推
08/31 22:28, , 34F
08/31 22:28, 34F
→
08/31 22:38, , 35F
08/31 22:38, 35F
推
08/31 22:43, , 36F
08/31 22:43, 36F
推
08/31 22:43, , 37F
08/31 22:43, 37F
推
08/31 22:45, , 38F
08/31 22:45, 38F
→
08/31 22:51, , 39F
08/31 22:51, 39F
還有 36 則推文
→
09/01 11:32, , 76F
09/01 11:32, 76F
推
09/01 11:40, , 77F
09/01 11:40, 77F
推
09/01 11:42, , 78F
09/01 11:42, 78F
→
09/01 11:44, , 79F
09/01 11:44, 79F
→
09/01 11:45, , 80F
09/01 11:45, 80F
→
09/01 11:53, , 81F
09/01 11:53, 81F
推
09/01 12:10, , 82F
09/01 12:10, 82F
→
09/01 12:19, , 83F
09/01 12:19, 83F
→
09/01 12:23, , 84F
09/01 12:23, 84F
推
09/01 14:43, , 85F
09/01 14:43, 85F
→
09/01 14:45, , 86F
09/01 14:45, 86F
→
09/01 14:46, , 87F
09/01 14:46, 87F
→
09/01 14:48, , 88F
09/01 14:48, 88F
→
09/01 14:50, , 89F
09/01 14:50, 89F
推
09/01 16:24, , 90F
09/01 16:24, 90F
推
09/01 16:37, , 91F
09/01 16:37, 91F
推
09/01 16:56, , 92F
09/01 16:56, 92F
→
09/01 16:57, , 93F
09/01 16:57, 93F
推
09/01 17:51, , 94F
09/01 17:51, 94F
推
09/01 18:14, , 95F
09/01 18:14, 95F
推
09/01 18:38, , 96F
09/01 18:38, 96F
→
09/01 18:41, , 97F
09/01 18:41, 97F
推
09/01 18:59, , 98F
09/01 18:59, 98F
推
09/01 19:16, , 99F
09/01 19:16, 99F
推
09/01 21:40, , 100F
09/01 21:40, 100F
→
09/01 21:41, , 101F
09/01 21:41, 101F
推
09/01 23:16, , 102F
09/01 23:16, 102F
推
09/02 01:49, , 103F
09/02 01:49, 103F
推
09/02 02:51, , 104F
09/02 02:51, 104F
→
09/02 02:52, , 105F
09/02 02:52, 105F
→
09/02 04:11, , 106F
09/02 04:11, 106F
推
09/02 11:55, , 107F
09/02 11:55, 107F
→
09/02 12:50, , 108F
09/02 12:50, 108F
推
09/02 13:29, , 109F
09/02 13:29, 109F
→
09/02 13:29, , 110F
09/02 13:29, 110F
推
09/02 23:34, , 111F
09/02 23:34, 111F
推
09/04 12:43, , 112F
09/04 12:43, 112F
推
09/05 10:59, , 113F
09/05 10:59, 113F
→
12/10 10:06, , 114F
12/10 10:06, 114F
※ 編輯: lejnsaryai (118.232.107.119), 06/26/2018 01:22:42