Re: /proc filesystem allows bypassing directory permissions on L

看板Bugtraq作者時間16年前 (2009/10/27 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串7/44 (看更多)
On 24.10.2009 2:39, Pavel Machek wrote: >>> Original owner did chmod 666... after making sure traditional unix >>> permissions protect the file. Please look at original mail; it was >>> subtle but I believe I got it right, and file would not be writable >>> with /proc unmounted. >>> >> I remember the original mail content. You're right, you can't reach >> the file if the procfs is not mounted, but you forget about the >> race, allowing the guest to create a hardlink to the file in an >> unrestricted location before the directory access becomes >> restricted. Again, procfs is just another, specific kind of >> hardlinks. > > Check it again. There's no race; I check link count before chmod 666. I didn't see real commands checking the link count, just comments telling about it. Not to tell about your script is broken by design. With what object do you 'chmod 0666 unwritable_file', if that file is not designed for access by anybody other than you? This is a rhetorical question. -- Sincerely Your, Dan.
文章代碼(AID): #1AvUFWUM (Bugtraq)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 44 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1AvUFWUM (Bugtraq)