[討論] 男生是不是要有侵略性一點比較好?
前面有一篇文章的作者女生
最近疑似被一個草食男好友追求
那篇作者的說法是男生外表不錯,做人溫和有禮
相處愉快
可是可能覺得對方太溫沒有什麼想在一起的衝動
這種例子我好像不是第一次看到
底下的推文好像也有類似案例?
如果是男生,遇到長的不錯的女生好聊好相處大概多少都會思考追求的可能性
以前大家都說男生要紳士有禮貌,才會受女生喜歡
這是不是個大騙局呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.136.11.145
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Boy-Girl/M.1503893384.A.A40.html
→
08/28 12:11, , 1F
08/28 12:11, 1F
噓
08/28 12:13, , 2F
08/28 12:13, 2F
沒有要答案 只是想聊聊而已
想看看周遭更多的例子或反例
※ 編輯: shaomi (223.136.11.145), 08/28/2017 12:15:22
推
08/28 12:17, , 3F
08/28 12:17, 3F
推
08/28 12:24, , 4F
08/28 12:24, 4F
推
08/28 12:24, , 5F
08/28 12:24, 5F
→
08/28 12:24, , 6F
08/28 12:24, 6F
→
08/28 12:25, , 7F
08/28 12:25, 7F
推
08/28 12:26, , 8F
08/28 12:26, 8F
推
08/28 12:26, , 9F
08/28 12:26, 9F
→
08/28 12:26, , 10F
08/28 12:26, 10F
噓
08/28 12:30, , 11F
08/28 12:30, 11F
推
08/28 12:34, , 12F
08/28 12:34, 12F
推
08/28 12:37, , 13F
08/28 12:37, 13F
噓
08/28 12:38, , 14F
08/28 12:38, 14F
推
08/28 12:38, , 15F
08/28 12:38, 15F
推
08/28 12:42, , 16F
08/28 12:42, 16F
→
08/28 12:42, , 17F
08/28 12:42, 17F
推
08/28 12:44, , 18F
08/28 12:44, 18F
推
08/28 12:46, , 19F
08/28 12:46, 19F
噓
08/28 12:48, , 20F
08/28 12:48, 20F
推
08/28 12:50, , 21F
08/28 12:50, 21F
那就以都帥哥來說
紳士溫和有禮帥哥跟會壁咚調情到處留情帥哥 XD
※ 編輯: shaomi (223.136.11.145), 08/28/2017 12:52:19
感覺都帥哥的話應該就是個人口味問題了
※ 編輯: shaomi (223.136.11.145), 08/28/2017 12:53:09
推
08/28 12:52, , 22F
08/28 12:52, 22F
→
08/28 12:53, , 23F
08/28 12:53, 23F
推
08/28 12:56, , 24F
08/28 12:56, 24F
→
08/28 12:56, , 25F
08/28 12:56, 25F
推
08/28 13:03, , 26F
08/28 13:03, 26F
→
08/28 13:03, , 27F
08/28 13:03, 27F
推
08/28 13:06, , 28F
08/28 13:06, 28F
→
08/28 13:07, , 29F
08/28 13:07, 29F
→
08/28 13:07, , 30F
08/28 13:07, 30F
推
08/28 13:21, , 31F
08/28 13:21, 31F
不過那篇的作者說男方她可以
※ 編輯: shaomi (223.136.11.145), 08/28/2017 13:23:08
→
08/28 13:24, , 32F
08/28 13:24, 32F
推
08/28 13:25, , 33F
08/28 13:25, 33F
→
08/28 13:25, , 34F
08/28 13:25, 34F
推
08/28 13:28, , 35F
08/28 13:28, 35F
推
08/28 13:32, , 36F
08/28 13:32, 36F
還有 91 則推文
→
08/28 20:33, , 128F
08/28 20:33, 128F
→
08/28 20:33, , 129F
08/28 20:33, 129F
→
08/28 20:34, , 130F
08/28 20:34, 130F
→
08/28 21:00, , 131F
08/28 21:00, 131F
推
08/28 21:38, , 132F
08/28 21:38, 132F
→
08/28 21:38, , 133F
08/28 21:38, 133F
推
08/28 23:40, , 134F
08/28 23:40, 134F
推
08/28 23:46, , 135F
08/28 23:46, 135F
→
08/29 00:56, , 136F
08/29 00:56, 136F
推
08/29 02:28, , 137F
08/29 02:28, 137F
→
08/29 02:28, , 138F
08/29 02:28, 138F
→
08/29 02:30, , 139F
08/29 02:30, 139F
→
08/29 02:30, , 140F
08/29 02:30, 140F
→
08/29 02:32, , 141F
08/29 02:32, 141F
→
08/29 02:32, , 142F
08/29 02:32, 142F
推
08/29 10:07, , 143F
08/29 10:07, 143F
→
08/29 10:07, , 144F
08/29 10:07, 144F
推
08/29 10:16, , 145F
08/29 10:16, 145F
→
08/29 10:16, , 146F
08/29 10:16, 146F
→
08/29 10:16, , 147F
08/29 10:16, 147F
推
08/29 11:42, , 148F
08/29 11:42, 148F
→
08/29 12:36, , 149F
08/29 12:36, 149F
推
08/29 12:38, , 150F
08/29 12:38, 150F
→
08/29 12:41, , 151F
08/29 12:41, 151F
→
08/29 12:41, , 152F
08/29 12:41, 152F
→
08/29 12:41, , 153F
08/29 12:41, 153F
→
08/29 12:42, , 154F
08/29 12:42, 154F
→
08/29 12:44, , 155F
08/29 12:44, 155F
→
08/29 12:44, , 156F
08/29 12:44, 156F
推
08/29 15:05, , 157F
08/29 15:05, 157F
→
08/29 15:05, , 158F
08/29 15:05, 158F
推
08/29 16:06, , 159F
08/29 16:06, 159F
推
08/29 19:32, , 160F
08/29 19:32, 160F
推
08/30 01:10, , 161F
08/30 01:10, 161F
→
08/30 04:00, , 162F
08/30 04:00, 162F
推
08/30 11:13, , 163F
08/30 11:13, 163F
推
09/03 22:53, , 164F
09/03 22:53, 164F
推
09/26 07:15, , 165F
09/26 07:15, 165F
→
03/06 09:03, , 166F
03/06 09:03, 166F
噓
05/10 00:07, , 167F
05/10 00:07, 167F