[閒聊] 你們心中的殺價尺在哪邊呢?
前陣子在板上PO賣遊戲,全新二手不一
其實也沒有特別說買多少有打折,因為我覺得價錢還算合理
有位版友,就不說誰了
一口氣買了兩款大的幾款小的,結算3450
我直接給他整零頭3400,他老大問買這麼多,不該多打一點嗎?
我覺得買賣有道,雙方都希望可以抓到合理的價錢
那你覺得價錢應該是,我問道
直接喊價3000,我差點手機掉到地上。
當下跟他拒絕這價錢
心想
二手遊戲不是商家進貨有成本跟利潤
賣全新價錢不好也沒市場,事後他才表明只是想買其中兩款
覺得好心要幫忙清倉,才一口氣買這麼多其他的小遊戲
說他自己也是在賣東西了,殺價喊價很正常
還搬出來了難道你買房子不會殺價嗎?
他怎麼知道我有多少利潤跟多少進貨價
事後,當然就沒有賣了
然後對方還以因情緒不賣,說我不是個好賣家
心理感概,玩桌遊五六年,多數交個朋友,日後相見都有可能再交流
像這樣殺雞取卵的喊價方式,我還是第一次遇到
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.171.159.93
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/BoardGame/M.1457849854.A.13B.html
→
03/13 14:24, , 1F
03/13 14:24, 1F
推
03/13 14:25, , 2F
03/13 14:25, 2F
→
03/13 14:25, , 3F
03/13 14:25, 3F
→
03/13 14:26, , 4F
03/13 14:26, 4F
→
03/13 14:26, , 5F
03/13 14:26, 5F
→
03/13 14:26, , 6F
03/13 14:26, 6F
→
03/13 14:26, , 7F
03/13 14:26, 7F
→
03/13 14:28, , 8F
03/13 14:28, 8F
→
03/13 14:28, , 9F
03/13 14:28, 9F
推
03/13 14:28, , 10F
03/13 14:28, 10F
→
03/13 14:29, , 11F
03/13 14:29, 11F
→
03/13 14:29, , 12F
03/13 14:29, 12F
→
03/13 14:32, , 13F
03/13 14:32, 13F
推
03/13 14:36, , 14F
03/13 14:36, 14F
→
03/13 14:36, , 15F
03/13 14:36, 15F
推
03/13 14:55, , 16F
03/13 14:55, 16F
推
03/13 15:10, , 17F
03/13 15:10, 17F
→
03/13 15:12, , 18F
03/13 15:12, 18F
→
03/13 15:12, , 19F
03/13 15:12, 19F
推
03/13 15:21, , 20F
03/13 15:21, 20F
推
03/13 15:32, , 21F
03/13 15:32, 21F
→
03/13 15:32, , 22F
03/13 15:32, 22F
推
03/13 15:35, , 23F
03/13 15:35, 23F
→
03/13 15:35, , 24F
03/13 15:35, 24F
推
03/13 15:46, , 25F
03/13 15:46, 25F
推
03/13 16:01, , 26F
03/13 16:01, 26F
推
03/13 16:25, , 27F
03/13 16:25, 27F
推
03/13 16:48, , 28F
03/13 16:48, 28F
推
03/13 18:09, , 29F
03/13 18:09, 29F
推
03/13 18:16, , 30F
03/13 18:16, 30F
推
03/13 18:18, , 31F
03/13 18:18, 31F
推
03/13 18:44, , 32F
03/13 18:44, 32F
讓我想起一個廣告,我們都會跟小販殺價,但我們從不跟麥當勞可口可樂殺價
因為對象是人?一開始講好的價錢,價錢談不到心目中的價位
就說本來沒有要買這麼多,帳號我就不PO了,其實也只是想分享這件事情
殺價這件事情是,開了頭就回不去了
賣家都只想得到最高的折扣跟最好的品質,當然我也是。
但殺之有物,跟殺之有理,還是上選。
純粹不喜歡那種,我買多是大爺,你就該先讓我選,讓我殺的感覺
※ 編輯: taroshen (1.171.159.93), 03/13/2016 18:52:20
推
03/13 19:42, , 33F
03/13 19:42, 33F
→
03/13 20:01, , 34F
03/13 20:01, 34F
推
03/13 20:09, , 35F
03/13 20:09, 35F
推
03/13 20:16, , 36F
03/13 20:16, 36F
推
03/13 20:29, , 37F
03/13 20:29, 37F
→
03/13 20:30, , 38F
03/13 20:30, 38F
→
03/13 20:31, , 39F
03/13 20:31, 39F
推
03/13 20:57, , 40F
03/13 20:57, 40F
推
03/13 21:00, , 41F
03/13 21:00, 41F
推
03/13 21:06, , 42F
03/13 21:06, 42F
→
03/13 21:07, , 43F
03/13 21:07, 43F
→
03/13 21:09, , 44F
03/13 21:09, 44F
→
03/13 21:09, , 45F
03/13 21:09, 45F
→
03/13 21:10, , 46F
03/13 21:10, 46F
→
03/13 21:54, , 47F
03/13 21:54, 47F
推
03/13 22:08, , 48F
03/13 22:08, 48F
→
03/13 22:20, , 49F
03/13 22:20, 49F
→
03/13 22:21, , 50F
03/13 22:21, 50F
→
03/13 22:22, , 51F
03/13 22:22, 51F
→
03/13 22:22, , 52F
03/13 22:22, 52F
→
03/13 23:03, , 53F
03/13 23:03, 53F
推
03/13 23:11, , 54F
03/13 23:11, 54F
推
03/13 23:13, , 55F
03/13 23:13, 55F
推
03/13 23:39, , 56F
03/13 23:39, 56F
→
03/13 23:40, , 57F
03/13 23:40, 57F
推
03/14 00:04, , 58F
03/14 00:04, 58F
→
03/14 00:04, , 59F
03/14 00:04, 59F
推
03/14 12:58, , 60F
03/14 12:58, 60F
→
03/14 12:59, , 61F
03/14 12:59, 61F
→
03/14 12:59, , 62F
03/14 12:59, 62F
推
03/14 13:35, , 63F
03/14 13:35, 63F
所以說這真的是有奇葩
→
03/14 16:26, , 64F
03/14 16:26, 64F
說實在昨天的事情我都不太記得,如果在"當年",有所冒犯,我在這邊跟你先道歉
閣下記得如此細節的事情,真是令我戒慎恐懼。我沒有說殺價不對,
只是在合理價格上去做。我文中想表達的是,買家的各種話術,並非針對殺價
爽約放鳥是我不對在先,是在什麼樣的情況下,我這麼做了
那時候的後來怎麼了?
推
03/14 16:39, , 65F
03/14 16:39, 65F
後來好像就沒有什麼發展,神奇買家,他就說不殺價他要直接買,不過
當然我就沒賣他了
※ 編輯: taroshen (1.171.159.93), 03/14/2016 20:47:39
→
03/15 21:41, , 66F
03/15 21:41, 66F
→
03/16 11:08, , 67F
03/16 11:08, 67F
→
03/16 11:09, , 68F
03/16 11:09, 68F
→
03/16 11:11, , 69F
03/16 11:11, 69F