[新聞] 明星賽專業人士票選有問題 引發中信兄弟不滿
http://sports.ettoday.net/news/944536
明星賽專業人士票選有問題 引發中信兄弟不滿
記者歐建智/台北報導
中華職棒明星賽今年加入專業人士票選,而且計分方式也有改變,使得球迷票選結果與最
終公布名單有落差,專業人士選出先發投手第1名是林樺慶,讓中信兄弟覺得不公平,領
隊劉志威說:「若第1名是史博威或道恩斯,一定可以接受。」
今年中華職棒明星賽票選是球迷選出的人選占分數的60%,再加上教練、球員以及媒體等
專業人士票選,專業人士的票選占了40%,再依排名進行加權總積分。
原本球迷票選24個明星賽先發位置,中信兄弟取得20個席位,加入專業人員票選後,中信
兄弟瞬間少了8個入選名單,讓球迷群起激憤,大喊不公。
這次明星賽票選最大爭議是,中信兄弟洋投伍鐸獲得球迷48萬票,是球迷票選先發投手,
但是加入專業人士票選之後,結果由球迷票選8萬票的桃猿洋投史博威贏得明星賽先發。
因為伍鐸是專業人士票選第6名,史博威是專業人士票選第2名、球迷票選第3名,伍鐸的
加權總積分3分,史博威是2.6分,分數愈少的出線。
劉志威表示,先不談伍鐸在專業人士的票選排名,但史博威也非專業人士票選先發投手第
1名,這樣的結果是無法認同,如果是史博威或道恩斯,大家都可以接受。
依據2017中華職棒明星賽票選辦法規範,為球迷總得票數所獲得的「排名」x 60% +專業
人員總得票數所獲得的「排名」x40%,即為該選手的「加權總積分」,加權總積分最接近
1,即為該守位之明星賽先發選手。
針對專業人員票選部分,實際參與投票之比例分別為教練18%、選手68%以及媒體記者14%
。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 171.4.233.173
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1497370883.A.4A0.html
→
06/14 00:23, , 1F
06/14 00:23, 1F
→
06/14 00:23, , 2F
06/14 00:23, 2F
推
06/14 00:24, , 3F
06/14 00:24, 3F
推
06/14 00:25, , 4F
06/14 00:25, 4F
推
06/14 00:25, , 5F
06/14 00:25, 5F
→
06/14 00:25, , 6F
06/14 00:25, 6F
噓
06/14 00:26, , 7F
06/14 00:26, 7F
推
06/14 00:26, , 8F
06/14 00:26, 8F
→
06/14 00:26, , 9F
06/14 00:26, 9F
→
06/14 00:27, , 10F
06/14 00:27, 10F
推
06/14 00:29, , 11F
06/14 00:29, 11F
推
06/14 00:29, , 12F
06/14 00:29, 12F
→
06/14 00:29, , 13F
06/14 00:29, 13F
推
06/14 00:31, , 14F
06/14 00:31, 14F
→
06/14 00:31, , 15F
06/14 00:31, 15F
推
06/14 00:31, , 16F
06/14 00:31, 16F
推
06/14 00:32, , 17F
06/14 00:32, 17F
推
06/14 00:32, , 18F
06/14 00:32, 18F
推
06/14 00:33, , 19F
06/14 00:33, 19F
推
06/14 00:33, , 20F
06/14 00:33, 20F
推
06/14 00:36, , 21F
06/14 00:36, 21F
推
06/14 00:39, , 22F
06/14 00:39, 22F
→
06/14 00:41, , 23F
06/14 00:41, 23F
→
06/14 00:42, , 24F
06/14 00:42, 24F
噓
06/14 00:44, , 25F
06/14 00:44, 25F
推
06/14 00:44, , 26F
06/14 00:44, 26F
推
06/14 00:49, , 27F
06/14 00:49, 27F
推
06/14 00:51, , 28F
06/14 00:51, 28F
推
06/14 00:58, , 29F
06/14 00:58, 29F
推
06/14 01:02, , 30F
06/14 01:02, 30F
推
06/14 01:03, , 31F
06/14 01:03, 31F
→
06/14 01:03, , 32F
06/14 01:03, 32F
推
06/14 01:03, , 33F
06/14 01:03, 33F
噓
06/14 01:04, , 34F
06/14 01:04, 34F
推
06/14 01:05, , 35F
06/14 01:05, 35F
推
06/14 01:09, , 36F
06/14 01:09, 36F
噓
06/14 01:10, , 37F
06/14 01:10, 37F
推
06/14 01:11, , 38F
06/14 01:11, 38F
推
06/14 01:12, , 39F
06/14 01:12, 39F
噓
06/14 01:23, , 40F
06/14 01:23, 40F
推
06/14 01:23, , 41F
06/14 01:23, 41F
推
06/14 01:26, , 42F
06/14 01:26, 42F
→
06/14 01:26, , 43F
06/14 01:26, 43F
推
06/14 01:34, , 44F
06/14 01:34, 44F
噓
06/14 02:24, , 45F
06/14 02:24, 45F
推
06/14 03:16, , 46F
06/14 03:16, 46F
推
06/14 03:44, , 47F
06/14 03:44, 47F
推
06/14 05:20, , 48F
06/14 05:20, 48F
推
06/14 06:09, , 49F
06/14 06:09, 49F
→
06/14 06:11, , 50F
06/14 06:11, 50F
噓
06/14 07:14, , 51F
06/14 07:14, 51F
推
06/14 07:21, , 52F
06/14 07:21, 52F
推
06/14 07:28, , 53F
06/14 07:28, 53F
噓
06/14 07:30, , 54F
06/14 07:30, 54F
推
06/14 08:03, , 55F
06/14 08:03, 55F
噓
06/14 08:15, , 56F
06/14 08:15, 56F
推
06/14 08:24, , 57F
06/14 08:24, 57F
推
06/14 08:48, , 58F
06/14 08:48, 58F
→
06/14 08:48, , 59F
06/14 08:48, 59F
推
06/14 08:49, , 60F
06/14 08:49, 60F
→
06/14 08:49, , 61F
06/14 08:49, 61F
→
06/14 09:00, , 62F
06/14 09:00, 62F
→
06/14 09:00, , 63F
06/14 09:00, 63F
推
06/14 09:18, , 64F
06/14 09:18, 64F
→
06/14 09:33, , 65F
06/14 09:33, 65F
→
06/14 09:33, , 66F
06/14 09:33, 66F
推
06/14 09:54, , 67F
06/14 09:54, 67F
→
06/14 09:54, , 68F
06/14 09:54, 68F
→
06/14 09:54, , 69F
06/14 09:54, 69F
推
06/14 10:02, , 70F
06/14 10:02, 70F
→
06/14 10:50, , 71F
06/14 10:50, 71F
推
06/14 11:20, , 72F
06/14 11:20, 72F
推
06/14 11:54, , 73F
06/14 11:54, 73F
→
06/14 11:59, , 74F
06/14 11:59, 74F
推
06/14 12:03, , 75F
06/14 12:03, 75F
推
06/14 13:21, , 76F
06/14 13:21, 76F