[閒聊] 限制先發洋投2人,培養本土會比較好嗎?已回收
洋將先發人數限制兩人,後援一人
强制要求球團培養土投先發
至少一週內兩洋投兩土投先發
多給年輕人先發舞台
不然一堆先發料被拉去後援
或一下先發一下後援的神調度
若真的這樣規定,中職有哪個
球隊可以有好成績呢?
若投手群較弱lamigo跟中信就不能
靠打擊cover投手悲劇了!
那也是不培養土投的後果吧!
這樣時間一久,中職真的可以培養
出好品質的先發投手嗎?
多給年輕人有舞台發揮不是更好嗎!
戰績不好只能怪球團短視、球探差
長期看各隊在刷洋投,有點無趣
洋將制度改成兩投一野或兩先一援
二軍也是比照此制度,變成"最多"
有6洋將在球隊,然後有升降制度跟
洋傷兵制度,杜絕抽福袋概念
這制度中職投手會有起色嗎?
(先不談教練功力)
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Samsung SM-N900.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.83.64.221
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1478576574.A.190.html
→
11/08 11:43, , 1F
11/08 11:43, 1F
推
11/08 11:43, , 2F
11/08 11:43, 2F
推
11/08 11:43, , 3F
11/08 11:43, 3F
推
11/08 11:44, , 4F
11/08 11:44, 4F
推
11/08 11:44, , 5F
11/08 11:44, 5F
推
11/08 11:44, , 6F
11/08 11:44, 6F
推
11/08 11:44, , 7F
11/08 11:44, 7F
噓
11/08 11:44, , 8F
11/08 11:44, 8F
→
11/08 11:45, , 9F
11/08 11:45, 9F
→
11/08 11:45, , 10F
11/08 11:45, 10F
推
11/08 11:45, , 11F
11/08 11:45, 11F
推
11/08 11:45, , 12F
11/08 11:45, 12F
推
11/08 11:46, , 13F
11/08 11:46, 13F
推
11/08 11:46, , 14F
11/08 11:46, 14F
推
11/08 11:47, , 15F
11/08 11:47, 15F
推
11/08 11:47, , 16F
11/08 11:47, 16F
→
11/08 11:47, , 17F
11/08 11:47, 17F
→
11/08 11:47, , 18F
11/08 11:47, 18F
推
11/08 11:47, , 19F
11/08 11:47, 19F
→
11/08 11:47, , 20F
11/08 11:47, 20F
噓
11/08 11:47, , 21F
11/08 11:47, 21F
→
11/08 11:48, , 22F
11/08 11:48, 22F
推
11/08 11:48, , 23F
11/08 11:48, 23F
推
11/08 11:49, , 24F
11/08 11:49, 24F
推
11/08 11:49, , 25F
11/08 11:49, 25F
推
11/08 11:49, , 26F
11/08 11:49, 26F
→
11/08 11:50, , 27F
11/08 11:50, 27F
※ 編輯: adsl30172 (111.83.64.221), 11/08/2016 11:53:24
推
11/08 11:52, , 28F
11/08 11:52, 28F
推
11/08 11:53, , 29F
11/08 11:53, 29F
推
11/08 11:56, , 30F
11/08 11:56, 30F
→
11/08 11:57, , 31F
11/08 11:57, 31F
推
11/08 11:58, , 32F
11/08 11:58, 32F
推
11/08 11:59, , 33F
11/08 11:59, 33F
→
11/08 11:59, , 34F
11/08 11:59, 34F
→
11/08 12:00, , 35F
11/08 12:00, 35F
→
11/08 12:00, , 36F
11/08 12:00, 36F
推
11/08 12:00, , 37F
11/08 12:00, 37F
推
11/08 12:03, , 38F
11/08 12:03, 38F
推
11/08 12:10, , 39F
11/08 12:10, 39F
→
11/08 12:11, , 40F
11/08 12:11, 40F
推
11/08 12:15, , 41F
11/08 12:15, 41F
推
11/08 12:16, , 42F
11/08 12:16, 42F
推
11/08 12:16, , 43F
11/08 12:16, 43F
→
11/08 12:16, , 44F
11/08 12:16, 44F
推
11/08 12:18, , 45F
11/08 12:18, 45F
噓
11/08 12:20, , 46F
11/08 12:20, 46F
→
11/08 12:20, , 47F
11/08 12:20, 47F
推
11/08 12:40, , 48F
11/08 12:40, 48F
推
11/08 12:41, , 49F
11/08 12:41, 49F
推
11/08 12:42, , 50F
11/08 12:42, 50F
→
11/08 12:42, , 51F
11/08 12:42, 51F
→
11/08 12:42, , 52F
11/08 12:42, 52F
→
11/08 12:43, , 53F
11/08 12:43, 53F
→
11/08 12:43, , 54F
11/08 12:43, 54F
→
11/08 12:44, , 55F
11/08 12:44, 55F
→
11/08 12:45, , 56F
11/08 12:45, 56F
→
11/08 12:46, , 57F
11/08 12:46, 57F
→
11/08 12:46, , 58F
11/08 12:46, 58F
→
11/08 12:47, , 59F
11/08 12:47, 59F
推
11/08 12:55, , 60F
11/08 12:55, 60F
推
11/08 12:56, , 61F
11/08 12:56, 61F
→
11/08 12:56, , 62F
11/08 12:56, 62F
→
11/08 13:13, , 63F
11/08 13:13, 63F
→
11/08 13:13, , 64F
11/08 13:13, 64F
→
11/08 13:13, , 65F
11/08 13:13, 65F
推
11/08 13:42, , 66F
11/08 13:42, 66F
推
11/08 13:50, , 67F
11/08 13:50, 67F
→
11/08 13:56, , 68F
11/08 13:56, 68F
→
11/08 13:56, , 69F
11/08 13:56, 69F
→
11/08 13:58, , 70F
11/08 13:58, 70F
→
11/08 14:04, , 71F
11/08 14:04, 71F
推
11/08 14:11, , 72F
11/08 14:11, 72F
→
11/08 14:36, , 73F
11/08 14:36, 73F
→
11/08 14:36, , 74F
11/08 14:36, 74F
推
11/08 17:09, , 75F
11/08 17:09, 75F
推
11/08 18:29, , 76F
11/08 18:29, 76F
→
11/08 18:29, , 77F
11/08 18:29, 77F