[討論] SS的貢獻度真的>CF嗎?已回收
有鑑於今天白天這個問題吵得蠻兇的
因此想要請教版友的意見如何
先來說一下守備光譜(Defensive Spectrum),這是之前Bill James所提出來的,各個守
備位置的防守難易度,越靠近左邊越簡單,越往右邊越困難。越往右邊的球員,守備要越
好,所以我們不會太要求他們的打擊能力,而越往左邊的位置,因為對於守備的要求不大
,所以我們會希望在這些位置上的球員攻擊越強越好。至於投捕手則是因為他們的位置有
其特殊性,所以被排除在外。
參考連結: http://goo.gl/Qdj5wl https://goo.gl/sJeMfz
守備難度的依序為: DH 1B LF RF 3B CF 2B SS C
整體來看扣掉投捕,SS的難度最高,但這只是守備"難度"而已,如果以"貢獻度"來看一個
好的外野手可以幫球隊守下不少分數,尤其是CF,畢竟外野一差就是長打甚至好幾分的差
別,內野除了車布邊通常只是一壘安打頂多一兩分的差別
但問題來了,內野的守備機會比外野多了一些,因此要比較SS和CF的守備"貢獻度"並不容
易,在義大我會覺得是CF稍大,不是說SS不好,畢竟釣蝦的守備是頂級中的頂級,可是在
其他球隊可能就不是這麼一回事了
綜合以上的敘述,請問大家覺得SS的整體貢獻度真的大於CF嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.113.45.122
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1470239979.A.2E6.html
※ 編輯: sfw2579 (140.113.45.122), 08/04/2016 00:01:15
推
08/04 00:01, , 1F
08/04 00:01, 1F
推
08/04 00:02, , 2F
08/04 00:02, 2F
→
08/04 00:03, , 3F
08/04 00:03, 3F
推
08/04 00:03, , 4F
08/04 00:03, 4F
→
08/04 00:03, , 5F
08/04 00:03, 5F
推
08/04 00:03, , 6F
08/04 00:03, 6F
→
08/04 00:03, , 7F
08/04 00:03, 7F
推
08/04 00:03, , 8F
08/04 00:03, 8F
→
08/04 00:04, , 9F
08/04 00:04, 9F
→
08/04 00:04, , 10F
08/04 00:04, 10F
→
08/04 00:05, , 11F
08/04 00:05, 11F
推
08/04 00:05, , 12F
08/04 00:05, 12F
推
08/04 00:05, , 13F
08/04 00:05, 13F
推
08/04 00:06, , 14F
08/04 00:06, 14F
→
08/04 00:06, , 15F
08/04 00:06, 15F
推
08/04 00:06, , 16F
08/04 00:06, 16F
推
08/04 00:07, , 17F
08/04 00:07, 17F
→
08/04 00:08, , 18F
08/04 00:08, 18F
推
08/04 00:09, , 19F
08/04 00:09, 19F
推
08/04 00:09, , 20F
08/04 00:09, 20F
→
08/04 00:09, , 21F
08/04 00:09, 21F
→
08/04 00:11, , 22F
08/04 00:11, 22F
→
08/04 00:11, , 23F
08/04 00:11, 23F
推
08/04 00:12, , 24F
08/04 00:12, 24F
→
08/04 00:12, , 25F
08/04 00:12, 25F
→
08/04 00:13, , 26F
08/04 00:13, 26F
→
08/04 00:13, , 27F
08/04 00:13, 27F
→
08/04 00:13, , 28F
08/04 00:13, 28F
推
08/04 00:14, , 29F
08/04 00:14, 29F
→
08/04 00:15, , 30F
08/04 00:15, 30F
→
08/04 00:16, , 31F
08/04 00:16, 31F
推
08/04 00:16, , 32F
08/04 00:16, 32F
→
08/04 00:16, , 33F
08/04 00:16, 33F
→
08/04 00:16, , 34F
08/04 00:16, 34F
→
08/04 00:17, , 35F
08/04 00:17, 35F
→
08/04 00:17, , 36F
08/04 00:17, 36F
→
08/04 00:17, , 37F
08/04 00:17, 37F
→
08/04 00:17, , 38F
08/04 00:17, 38F
推
08/04 00:17, , 39F
08/04 00:17, 39F
還有 43 則推文
推
08/04 00:37, , 83F
08/04 00:37, 83F
→
08/04 00:37, , 84F
08/04 00:37, 84F
推
08/04 00:38, , 85F
08/04 00:38, 85F
→
08/04 00:38, , 86F
08/04 00:38, 86F
推
08/04 00:39, , 87F
08/04 00:39, 87F
→
08/04 00:39, , 88F
08/04 00:39, 88F
→
08/04 00:39, , 89F
08/04 00:39, 89F
→
08/04 00:39, , 90F
08/04 00:39, 90F
推
08/04 00:41, , 91F
08/04 00:41, 91F
→
08/04 00:42, , 92F
08/04 00:42, 92F
推
08/04 00:42, , 93F
08/04 00:42, 93F
→
08/04 00:43, , 94F
08/04 00:43, 94F
→
08/04 00:43, , 95F
08/04 00:43, 95F
推
08/04 00:48, , 96F
08/04 00:48, 96F
推
08/04 00:52, , 97F
08/04 00:52, 97F
→
08/04 00:55, , 98F
08/04 00:55, 98F
推
08/04 01:09, , 99F
08/04 01:09, 99F
→
08/04 01:12, , 100F
08/04 01:12, 100F
推
08/04 01:16, , 101F
08/04 01:16, 101F
推
08/04 01:28, , 102F
08/04 01:28, 102F
→
08/04 01:28, , 103F
08/04 01:28, 103F
推
08/04 01:29, , 104F
08/04 01:29, 104F
推
08/04 02:09, , 105F
08/04 02:09, 105F
→
08/04 02:31, , 106F
08/04 02:31, 106F
→
08/04 02:36, , 107F
08/04 02:36, 107F
推
08/04 04:06, , 108F
08/04 04:06, 108F
推
08/04 07:30, , 109F
08/04 07:30, 109F
推
08/04 07:32, , 110F
08/04 07:32, 110F
→
08/04 07:33, , 111F
08/04 07:33, 111F
→
08/04 07:40, , 112F
08/04 07:40, 112F
→
08/04 07:41, , 113F
08/04 07:41, 113F
噓
08/04 07:45, , 114F
08/04 07:45, 114F
推
08/04 07:50, , 115F
08/04 07:50, 115F
→
08/04 07:50, , 116F
08/04 07:50, 116F
→
08/04 07:51, , 117F
08/04 07:51, 117F
推
08/04 07:54, , 118F
08/04 07:54, 118F
→
08/04 07:55, , 119F
08/04 07:55, 119F
推
08/04 09:07, , 120F
08/04 09:07, 120F
推
08/04 12:37, , 121F
08/04 12:37, 121F
推
08/04 22:54, , 122F
08/04 22:54, 122F