[問題] 為什麼只有Barry Bonds有這種待遇?消失
Barry Bonds史上最強自走砲 5次30-30 一次40-40和30-50
堪稱投手惡夢 寧願保送他 也不想和他對決 04年被故意四壞120次
生涯有688次被故意四壞 甚至有過單季.609的OBP 簡直是人間凶器
可是有點好奇的是 為什麼Albert Pujols(紅雀時期)和A-Rod沒有這種待遇?
難道是Bonds後面的棒次很弱嗎?可是那時候巨人不是還有Jeff Kent?
Pujols和A-Rod巔峰時期也是很恐怖的打者不是嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.126.140.27
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1444839775.A.7AA.html
推
10/15 00:23, , 1F
10/15 00:23, 1F
→
10/15 00:26, , 2F
10/15 00:26, 2F
推
10/15 00:27, , 3F
10/15 00:27, 3F
→
10/15 00:27, , 4F
10/15 00:27, 4F
推
10/15 00:29, , 5F
10/15 00:29, 5F
推
10/15 00:31, , 6F
10/15 00:31, 6F
推
10/15 00:32, , 7F
10/15 00:32, 7F
→
10/15 00:32, , 8F
10/15 00:32, 8F
→
10/15 00:33, , 9F
10/15 00:33, 9F
→
10/15 00:33, , 10F
10/15 00:33, 10F
推
10/15 00:34, , 11F
10/15 00:34, 11F
噓
10/15 00:34, , 12F
10/15 00:34, 12F
→
10/15 00:34, , 13F
10/15 00:34, 13F
→
10/15 00:35, , 14F
10/15 00:35, 14F
→
10/15 00:35, , 15F
10/15 00:35, 15F
推
10/15 00:35, , 16F
10/15 00:35, 16F
噓
10/15 00:36, , 17F
10/15 00:36, 17F
噓
10/15 00:36, , 18F
10/15 00:36, 18F
推
10/15 00:36, , 19F
10/15 00:36, 19F
→
10/15 00:37, , 20F
10/15 00:37, 20F
→
10/15 00:37, , 21F
10/15 00:37, 21F
→
10/15 00:37, , 22F
10/15 00:37, 22F
推
10/15 00:38, , 23F
10/15 00:38, 23F
→
10/15 00:38, , 24F
10/15 00:38, 24F
推
10/15 00:40, , 25F
10/15 00:40, 25F
推
10/15 00:40, , 26F
10/15 00:40, 26F
推
10/15 00:41, , 27F
10/15 00:41, 27F
推
10/15 00:42, , 28F
10/15 00:42, 28F
→
10/15 00:43, , 29F
10/15 00:43, 29F
→
10/15 00:44, , 30F
10/15 00:44, 30F
噓
10/15 00:44, , 31F
10/15 00:44, 31F
→
10/15 00:44, , 32F
10/15 00:44, 32F
推
10/15 00:45, , 33F
10/15 00:45, 33F
→
10/15 00:45, , 34F
10/15 00:45, 34F
→
10/15 00:46, , 35F
10/15 00:46, 35F
推
10/15 00:46, , 36F
10/15 00:46, 36F
推
10/15 00:48, , 37F
10/15 00:48, 37F
推
10/15 00:49, , 38F
10/15 00:49, 38F
推
10/15 00:51, , 39F
10/15 00:51, 39F
推
10/15 00:54, , 40F
10/15 00:54, 40F
推
10/15 00:55, , 41F
10/15 00:55, 41F
近年OPS+破200的只有94年重傷害、J.Bagwell跟98年馬怪爾 除了BB爺之外的人
※ 編輯: AlLeN0121 (59.126.140.27), 10/15/2015 01:01:58
推
10/15 01:04, , 42F
10/15 01:04, 42F
推
10/15 01:10, , 43F
10/15 01:10, 43F
推
10/15 01:11, , 44F
10/15 01:11, 44F
→
10/15 01:11, , 45F
10/15 01:11, 45F
推
10/15 01:16, , 46F
10/15 01:16, 46F
推
10/15 01:18, , 47F
10/15 01:18, 47F
→
10/15 01:19, , 48F
10/15 01:19, 48F
推
10/15 01:21, , 49F
10/15 01:21, 49F
→
10/15 01:25, , 50F
10/15 01:25, 50F
噓
10/15 01:30, , 51F
10/15 01:30, 51F
推
10/15 01:41, , 52F
10/15 01:41, 52F
推
10/15 01:43, , 53F
10/15 01:43, 53F
推
10/15 01:47, , 54F
10/15 01:47, 54F
推
10/15 01:54, , 55F
10/15 01:54, 55F
→
10/15 01:54, , 56F
10/15 01:54, 56F
推
10/15 02:02, , 57F
10/15 02:02, 57F
→
10/15 02:02, , 58F
10/15 02:02, 58F
→
10/15 02:02, , 59F
10/15 02:02, 59F
推
10/15 02:03, , 60F
10/15 02:03, 60F
推
10/15 02:16, , 61F
10/15 02:16, 61F
推
10/15 02:33, , 62F
10/15 02:33, 62F
推
10/15 02:35, , 63F
10/15 02:35, 63F
推
10/15 02:36, , 64F
10/15 02:36, 64F
→
10/15 02:36, , 65F
10/15 02:36, 65F
推
10/15 02:40, , 66F
10/15 02:40, 66F
推
10/15 02:43, , 67F
10/15 02:43, 67F
→
10/15 02:43, , 68F
10/15 02:43, 68F
推
10/15 02:49, , 69F
10/15 02:49, 69F
→
10/15 02:50, , 70F
10/15 02:50, 70F
推
10/15 02:54, , 71F
10/15 02:54, 71F
→
10/15 02:54, , 72F
10/15 02:54, 72F
推
10/15 02:59, , 73F
10/15 02:59, 73F
推
10/15 03:45, , 74F
10/15 03:45, 74F
推
10/15 06:43, , 75F
10/15 06:43, 75F
推
10/15 06:50, , 76F
10/15 06:50, 76F
推
10/15 07:42, , 77F
10/15 07:42, 77F
→
10/15 07:47, , 78F
10/15 07:47, 78F
推
10/15 08:53, , 79F
10/15 08:53, 79F
推
10/15 09:01, , 80F
10/15 09:01, 80F
→
10/15 09:01, , 81F
10/15 09:01, 81F
推
10/15 09:13, , 82F
10/15 09:13, 82F
→
10/15 09:14, , 83F
10/15 09:14, 83F
推
10/15 09:17, , 84F
10/15 09:17, 84F
噓
10/15 09:25, , 85F
10/15 09:25, 85F
推
10/15 10:17, , 86F
10/15 10:17, 86F
推
10/15 18:15, , 87F
10/15 18:15, 87F