[討論] 陳16是否值千萬年薪?消失
一個一年貢獻不到200局的投手 確有人認為值得千萬年薪?
我是持很懷疑的態度
一般能夠拿到千萬年薪
投球局數200局 均速150 三振率最好要高於平均 這些都是基本條件
像陳這樣的竟然被吹到值五年6千萬? 會這樣認為真不知道是腦袋進了甚麼東西
這種條件頂多一年拿到850
就已經很頂了
可以開QO又不代表非開不可
一個不到200局的二號先發還能有如此投球內容
沒有球團刻意保護恐怕很難維持了
全大聯盟恐怕找不到第二個休總和金鳥這樣佛心的球隊了
更不用說是對一個韌帶重新接過的不定時炸彈
敢用平均破千的複數約去賭
背後的動機
恐怕也不是只是勇氣可嘉這麼簡單吧
也因此
如果陳離開金鳥和休總 恐怕只能自求多福了
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.160.176.39
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1443894547.A.F03.html
→
10/04 01:49, , 1F
10/04 01:49, 1F
→
10/04 01:49, , 2F
10/04 01:49, 2F
推
10/04 01:49, , 3F
10/04 01:49, 3F
噓
10/04 01:50, , 4F
10/04 01:50, 4F
→
10/04 01:50, , 5F
10/04 01:50, 5F
噓
10/04 01:50, , 6F
10/04 01:50, 6F
→
10/04 01:50, , 7F
10/04 01:50, 7F
推
10/04 01:51, , 8F
10/04 01:51, 8F
噓
10/04 01:51, , 9F
10/04 01:51, 9F
噓
10/04 01:51, , 10F
10/04 01:51, 10F
噓
10/04 01:51, , 11F
10/04 01:51, 11F
噓
10/04 01:51, , 12F
10/04 01:51, 12F
噓
10/04 01:51, , 13F
10/04 01:51, 13F
→
10/04 01:52, , 14F
10/04 01:52, 14F
→
10/04 01:52, , 15F
10/04 01:52, 15F
噓
10/04 01:52, , 16F
10/04 01:52, 16F
推
10/04 01:53, , 17F
10/04 01:53, 17F
噓
10/04 01:54, , 18F
10/04 01:54, 18F
噓
10/04 01:54, , 19F
10/04 01:54, 19F
噓
10/04 01:54, , 20F
10/04 01:54, 20F
還有 67 則推文
還有 65 段內文
噓
10/04 06:41, , 88F
10/04 06:41, 88F
噓
10/04 07:08, , 89F
10/04 07:08, 89F
噓
10/04 07:13, , 90F
10/04 07:13, 90F
推
10/04 07:42, , 91F
10/04 07:42, 91F
推
10/04 08:16, , 92F
10/04 08:16, 92F
噓
10/04 08:56, , 93F
10/04 08:56, 93F
推
10/04 09:27, , 94F
10/04 09:27, 94F
→
10/04 09:27, , 95F
10/04 09:27, 95F
噓
10/04 09:53, , 96F
10/04 09:53, 96F
噓
10/04 09:56, , 97F
10/04 09:56, 97F
噓
10/04 10:00, , 98F
10/04 10:00, 98F
噓
10/04 10:26, , 99F
10/04 10:26, 99F
噓
10/04 10:40, , 100F
10/04 10:40, 100F
噓
10/04 10:43, , 101F
10/04 10:43, 101F
噓
10/04 10:49, , 102F
10/04 10:49, 102F
推
10/04 10:57, , 103F
10/04 10:57, 103F
→
10/04 10:57, , 104F
10/04 10:57, 104F
噓
10/04 12:54, , 105F
10/04 12:54, 105F
噓
10/04 14:44, , 106F
10/04 14:44, 106F
→
10/04 19:06, , 107F
10/04 19:06, 107F