Re: [情報] Blazers discussing trade for Grizzli …

看板BLAZERS作者Iverigma (big 3:Oden-Roy-Aldridge)時間15年前 (2008/11/29 14:41)推噓17(17推 0噓 11→)

留言28則, 12人參與討論串1/1

※ 引述《Aldridge (目標：季後賽我來啦)》之銘言： : sports.yahoo http://0rz.tw/5855z : The Portland Trail Blazers and Memphis Grizzlies have discussed a multiplayer : trade that centers on the exchange of forward Travis Outlaw and point guard : Mike Conley, league sources said Friday. http://columbian.com/article/20081128/BLOGS05/811289972/-1/BLAZERBANTER Columbian 的隨隊記者說這個rumor不會發生，也獲得 KP 『間接』證實大意是說：我們要談的交易，一定會以 Raef LaFrentz 的到期合約為主體因為這樣我們才能在不放棄太多人才的情況下，拿到我們想要的人今天他也跟 KP 聊過了，雖然 KP 拒絕評論這個謠言，但他也同意上述的說法：『那（指Raef LaFrentz的到期合約）才是我想出的牌。』 If you're one of the many who have read this report on Yahoo! Sports, which says the Blazers and Memphis Grizzlies have discussed a swap primarily involving Travis Outlaw and Mike Conley, I have a message for you: If the rumors you read don't involve Raef LaFrentz's contract, I wouldn't put much stock into them. LaFrentz, as pretty much everybody knows, is out for most of the season with a torn labrum in his right shoulder, and is in the final year of a contract that will pay him $12.7 million. But if he misses the first 41 games of the season, each successive game missed will bring an 80 percent return of its pro-rated salary in insurance to the team that holds his contract. The combination of the expiring contract and insurance is expected to draw significant trade interest. There's two reasons the Blazers will look to play this card over others like the one reported on Yahoo! -- which I was firmly told before Friday's game will not happen. One, the Blazers seem to be quite happy with their point guard play as Steve Blake, Sergio Rodriguez and Brandon Roy have performed very solidly. They don't seem to feel that they need an elite-level point guard to turn the corner, and they certainly don't seem to be in the mode of wanting to address the position by developing another young point guard. If they were, wouldn't Jerryd Bayless be getting more minutes? The second point is a question you need to ask yourself when reading these rumors: Why would the Blazers look to do a deal involving a player, when they stand to lose so much more doing that than if they were to trade LaFrentz's contract, which is going to expire at the end of the season anyway? And that's not just my line of thinking. When I asked Blazers general manager Kevin Pritchard about the Yahoo! rumor on Thursday, he declined to discuss it -- as is his standard policy -- but instead started a discussion about LaFrentz's contract. "That's the card I want to play," he said. So keep that in mind as the rumors start to heat up over the next couple months. I'm not saying the Blazers won't work a deal that doesn't involve LaFrentz's contract. But from what I'm hearing, the possibility of that happening before next summer sounds very slim. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 72.87.47.212

推

BeStronger

11/29 14:46, , 1^F

11/29 14:46, 1^F

推

walalila

11/29 15:29, , 2^F

11/29 15:29, 2^F

推

jessieptb

11/29 19:29, , 3^F

11/29 19:29, 3^F