[問題] 請問 單年度的MLB隊伍
想請問可否推薦小弟MLB的單年度隊伍呢,
之前是玩94兄弟有點膩了,
最近想換換口味玩玩看MLB球隊,
較偏好單年度的隊伍,有700萬左右資金,
看到03馬林魚還不錯,有無可以更猛的隊伍呢?
但是有些都舊資料前陣子好像又有重評之類的,
所以有一些文章球隊也是舊資料沒更新,
冷門的也無妨哦,希望可以熱心給我點靈感,
有點未來性更好,例如有可能再重評成更好一點之類的...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.171.67.185
推
05/31 02:58, , 1F
05/31 02:58, 1F
96洛磯的投手好像不太有力,96印地安的外野腿偏短...
推
05/31 03:09, , 2F
05/31 03:09, 2F
不想太偏純槍或純砲的...
推
05/31 03:29, , 3F
05/31 03:29, 3F
推
05/31 04:21, , 4F
05/31 04:21, 4F
洋基不考慮,希望來個冷門一點的試試看!
推
05/31 05:14, , 5F
05/31 05:14, 5F
→
05/31 05:15, , 6F
05/31 05:15, 6F
推
05/31 06:20, , 7F
05/31 06:20, 7F
感覺還不錯,投手不錯,打線也滿平均沒有洞@@
推
05/31 08:01, , 8F
05/31 08:01, 8F
推
05/31 08:04, , 9F
05/31 08:04, 9F
推
05/31 08:26, , 10F
05/31 08:26, 10F
打線不錯,但投手好像有點冏
推
05/31 08:32, , 11F
05/31 08:32, 11F
推
05/31 08:39, , 12F
05/31 08:39, 12F
推
05/31 09:06, , 13F
05/31 09:06, 13F
推
05/31 09:20, , 14F
05/31 09:20, 14F
推
05/31 09:23, , 15F
05/31 09:23, 15F
感覺不錯欸,但是3B跟C好像是個洞...只能傭一隻,這要怎麼解決呢
推
05/31 09:52, , 16F
05/31 09:52, 16F
好像預算不太夠,不然這隊好猛!
推
05/31 10:08, , 17F
05/31 10:08, 17F
→
05/31 10:09, , 18F
05/31 10:09, 18F
推
05/31 10:35, , 19F
05/31 10:35, 19F
03勇士也是砲火兇猛阿!!但是1B算是個斷層..
推
05/31 10:45, , 20F
05/31 10:45, 20F
推
05/31 11:00, , 21F
05/31 11:00, 21F
推
05/31 11:03, , 22F
05/31 11:03, 22F
推
05/31 11:11, , 23F
05/31 11:11, 23F
推
05/31 11:45, , 24F
05/31 11:45, 24F
→
05/31 12:33, , 25F
05/31 12:33, 25F
推
05/31 13:52, , 26F
05/31 13:52, 26F
先謝謝各位的回覆,以上推論都是大致上看過,如果有錯的地方麻煩糾正!
※ 編輯: crazymon 來自: 1.174.62.202 (05/31 14:05)
推
05/31 14:15, , 27F
05/31 14:15, 27F
推
05/31 15:37, , 28F
05/31 15:37, 28F
推
05/31 16:56, , 29F
05/31 16:56, 29F
推
05/31 17:15, , 30F
05/31 17:15, 30F
→
05/31 17:16, , 31F
05/31 17:16, 31F
推
05/31 17:30, , 32F
05/31 17:30, 32F
推
05/31 17:43, , 33F
05/31 17:43, 33F
推
05/31 18:10, , 34F
05/31 18:10, 34F
→
05/31 18:13, , 35F
05/31 18:13, 35F
推
05/31 21:43, , 36F
05/31 21:43, 36F
推
05/31 21:56, , 37F
05/31 21:56, 37F
→
05/31 21:56, , 38F
05/31 21:56, 38F
推
05/31 23:53, , 39F
05/31 23:53, 39F
→
06/01 01:53, , 40F
06/01 01:53, 40F
推
06/01 15:27, , 41F
06/01 15:27, 41F
推
06/02 14:54, , 42F
06/02 14:54, 42F
→
06/02 14:55, , 43F
06/02 14:55, 43F