[新聞] 貨機墜機 in Bagram

看板Aviation作者 (ming)時間12年前 (2013/05/01 10:07), 編輯推噓12(12011)
留言23則, 21人參與, 最新討論串1/1
原網址 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/04/30 /weather-may-have-played-role-in-horrifying-bagram-airfield-crash/ 縮網址 http://ppt.cc/uhNf 影片連結 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vo51Be2jL8c
The Washington Post Weather may have played role in horrifying Bagram Airfield Crash A 747 U.S. cargo plane crashed on its ascent from Bagram, Afghanistan Monday, killing all 7 American crew members aboard. The exact cause of the crash is not known, but thunderstorms were in the area. The plane, in route to Dubai (United Arab Emirates), was carrying 5 military vehicles according to the Aviation Herald. The Aviation Herald describes the sequence of events leading up to the crash: Several observers on the ground reported the National Air Cargo Boeing 747-400 had just lifted off and was climbing through approximately 1200 feet when it’s nose sharply rose, the aircraft appeared to have stalled and came down erupting in a blaze. METARS – weather reports intended primarily for aviation purposes – show thunderstorms and swirling winds coincided with the takeoff. From Aviation-Safety.net: A thunderstorm with Cumulonimbus clouds was approaching the air base at the time of the accident. A weather report shows winds began shifting from 100 degrees [from the east] at 09:55 UTC to 350 degrees [from the north] at 10:55 UTC. Accident time was about 15:00 LT / 10:30 UTC “One army spokesperson said the crash occurred due to low altitude after takeoff,” reports Business Insider, which quoted a pilot who said a cargo shift may have contributed. Whether it was the weather, loose cargo, and/or other factors that prevented the plane from gaining altitude will presumably be determined in crash assessments. Below is a terrifying video of the crash obtained from a car’s dashboard camera. C Caution: it is very disturbing footage which may upset some viewers. Also, it contains an expletive around 1 minute and 13 seconds into the video. 從影片看來像是被強風影響到攻角,還請高手解惑。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 120.126.12.55

05/01 10:12, , 1F
載運物沒固定好..
05/01 10:12, 1F

05/01 10:13, , 2F
新聞說是機艙內的軍用車沒固定好...
05/01 10:13, 2F

05/01 10:30, , 3F
新聞說貨物移位只是可能性之一 但主要是高度過低
05/01 10:30, 3F

05/01 10:44, , 4F
G/W CG跑掉 GG
05/01 10:44, 4F

05/01 11:18, , 5F
所以一開始有人說是把747F當C130飛是原因之一嗎?
05/01 11:18, 5F

05/01 12:23, , 6F
影片上輪胎是放下來的耶...why?
05/01 12:23, 6F

05/01 12:26, , 7F
還沒來的及收就STALL了吧
05/01 12:26, 7F

05/01 12:33, , 8F
組員們…………RIP
05/01 12:33, 8F

05/01 12:38, , 9F
這影片有點恐怖........
05/01 12:38, 9F

05/01 12:57, , 10F
R.I.P.
05/01 12:57, 10F

05/01 13:13, , 11F
沒有組員會故意把飛機當另一種飛機飛的...
05/01 13:13, 11F

05/01 13:15, , 12F
說飛行員把747當C130飛實在很沒口德
05/01 13:15, 12F

05/01 13:25, , 13F
影片747好像變成氣球 亂飄..
05/01 13:25, 13F

05/01 14:26, , 14F
那只是比喻 沒有嚴重到沒口德吧
05/01 14:26, 14F

05/01 16:03, , 15F
那家航空公司本來就很多是美空軍或是空中國民兵轉職的....
05/01 16:03, 15F

05/01 16:04, , 16F
他還是空運司令部的租機
05/01 16:04, 16F

05/01 17:42, , 17F
RIP..
05/01 17:42, 17F

05/01 20:22, , 18F
看影片好像氣動力重心跟重心不對
05/01 20:22, 18F

05/01 21:30, , 19F
C130 應該失速角度比747小??
05/01 21:30, 19F

05/01 21:46, , 20F
為啥行車紀錄器上的日期是2013/02/01??
05/01 21:46, 20F

05/01 21:54, , 21F
沒調而已吧
05/01 21:54, 21F

05/01 22:11, , 22F
CG 超過aft limit, 八九不離十又超載.
05/01 22:11, 22F

05/05 20:30, , 23F
RIP,突然在空中停住然後跟氣球一樣的飄著,真可怕
05/05 20:30, 23F
文章代碼(AID): #1HW7Zl3F (Aviation)