Re: [交易] 賣-台北-皆可 賣杜蘭朵IA-101A星版
我曾經使用過IA101兩年多
不過是原PO的下一代 -限量30台的IA101B
有圖有真相
http://i.imgur.com/D2yqH4o.jpg
兩者在調音手法略有差異
但線路是一樣的
基本走向相信也不會差太多
(我沒實際A B test過,但據說B版聲音較寬鬆溫暖一些些,前代則是更俐落的走向)
這台綜擴,
個人覺得有以下的缺點
1.外觀乍看之下相當不錯,也夠精緻,算是該價位帶的佼佼者
但細部作工,和德國 瑞士甚至日本等國的中高價器材相比,
坦白說還是有相當相當的距離
2.S/N比略差,背景也不夠黑,
送回原廠升級東京光音VR可改善些,但聲底也會略改變
3.無遙控 -在古早時代沒有遙控也許是個優點,
但現在一台要價5萬多,沒有遙控功能的晶體綜擴,
相信會讓不少人卻步
(最新版101C 實售已破5萬了,之前的豪華版100 Anniversary更是超過6萬)
4.熱機慢-所以不能隨便關機,不然重新熱機可有的等了
5.外觀很有那麼回事,但本質就是個人工作室的土砲產品,
使用起來有國外一些蠅量級土砲小廠的fu
當然這是不是缺點見仁見智,有人就是喜歡這種個性小廠的東西
6.想PK數倍的進口優質綜擴?千萬別妄想,沒那麼容易
7.使用這台,在江湖上行走遇到氣宗高手需迴避
否則會被氣功震傷
(待續)
--
人生就像泡沫 吹的越大 期望越多
等到破滅了 才心生許多不甘
卻忘了即使不破 自己也還是個泡沫而已
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.249.106.50
推
04/10 12:59, , 1F
04/10 12:59, 1F
※ 編輯: richter 來自: 60.249.106.50 (04/10 13:10)
推
04/10 13:22, , 2F
04/10 13:22, 2F
→
04/10 13:32, , 3F
04/10 13:32, 3F
→
04/10 13:37, , 4F
04/10 13:37, 4F
推
04/10 14:09, , 5F
04/10 14:09, 5F
→
04/10 14:11, , 6F
04/10 14:11, 6F
→
04/10 14:12, , 7F
04/10 14:12, 7F
推
04/10 14:24, , 8F
04/10 14:24, 8F
→
04/10 14:36, , 9F
04/10 14:36, 9F
推
04/10 14:47, , 10F
04/10 14:47, 10F
→
04/10 14:47, , 11F
04/10 14:47, 11F
推
04/10 15:10, , 12F
04/10 15:10, 12F
推
04/10 15:13, , 13F
04/10 15:13, 13F
推
04/10 15:13, , 14F
04/10 15:13, 14F
推
04/10 15:21, , 15F
04/10 15:21, 15F
推
04/10 15:35, , 16F
04/10 15:35, 16F
推
04/10 17:08, , 17F
04/10 17:08, 17F
→
04/10 17:08, , 18F
04/10 17:08, 18F
推
04/10 17:27, , 19F
04/10 17:27, 19F
→
04/10 17:28, , 20F
04/10 17:28, 20F
→
04/10 17:44, , 21F
04/10 17:44, 21F
推
04/10 17:53, , 22F
04/10 17:53, 22F
→
04/10 17:53, , 23F
04/10 17:53, 23F
→
04/10 17:54, , 24F
04/10 17:54, 24F
→
04/10 17:55, , 25F
04/10 17:55, 25F
推
04/10 18:12, , 26F
04/10 18:12, 26F
→
04/10 18:12, , 27F
04/10 18:12, 27F
→
04/10 18:12, , 28F
04/10 18:12, 28F
→
04/10 18:16, , 29F
04/10 18:16, 29F
→
04/10 18:16, , 30F
04/10 18:16, 30F
→
04/10 18:17, , 31F
04/10 18:17, 31F
→
04/10 18:18, , 32F
04/10 18:18, 32F
推
04/10 18:19, , 33F
04/10 18:19, 33F
推
04/10 18:19, , 34F
04/10 18:19, 34F
推
04/10 18:20, , 35F
04/10 18:20, 35F
→
04/10 18:20, , 36F
04/10 18:20, 36F
→
04/10 18:21, , 37F
04/10 18:21, 37F
推
04/10 19:17, , 38F
04/10 19:17, 38F
推
04/10 19:31, , 39F
04/10 19:31, 39F
推
04/10 19:35, , 40F
04/10 19:35, 40F
→
04/11 01:28, , 41F
04/11 01:28, 41F
→
04/11 08:56, , 42F
04/11 08:56, 42F
推
04/11 09:04, , 43F
04/11 09:04, 43F
推
04/11 09:52, , 44F
04/11 09:52, 44F
推
04/11 12:07, , 45F
04/11 12:07, 45F
推
04/11 12:26, , 46F
04/11 12:26, 46F
推
04/11 14:05, , 47F
04/11 14:05, 47F
推
05/29 22:44, , 48F
05/29 22:44, 48F
→
05/29 22:45, , 49F
05/29 22:45, 49F
→
05/29 22:48, , 50F
05/29 22:48, 50F
→
08/18 05:38, , 51F
08/18 05:38, 51F
→
10/05 03:18, , 52F
10/05 03:18, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 7 篇):