[請益] 投稿抗辯

看板AfterPhD作者 (beyond the time!)時間6年前 (2017/09/03 06:26), 6年前編輯推噓5(5推 0噓 17→)
留言22則, 7人參與, 最新討論串1/1
想請問大家,依據經驗是否應繼續寄信給C.I.E? 目前狀況如下: (0) 今年1月中投稿, Aug.22 23:00 拿到decision. AE: It seems that the scope of this paper does not match well with that of the journal. It is recommended that the authors submit to a more appropriate journal for the scope of this work. (1) Reviewer意見: (a) Reviewer-1: minor revision (b) Reviewer-2: major revision (要求cite三篇同作者群的paper,其餘意見只是補兩張圖,微調notation約10處) (c) Reviewer-3: Reject The paper is clearly written and the various steps of the process are well detailed. Comparisons with existing methods and application have also be clearly defined. We can just regret the small size of graphs in fig. 5 (f) and (g) wich are not easy to read. The differences with a preceding paper (YYYY 2014) are well described. Despite of its quality, this paper does not match the topics of XXXX, as it only discusses about ZZZZZZZZZZ, without proposing specifical XXXXXXXXXX. It would be better to propose this paper to another journal, like WWWW or ZZZZ. (2) Aug.23向其他前輩請教 & 和corresponding author確認後, 於 Aug. 24 02:00時,直接回decision letter向chief editor申訴. 申訴要點在於: (1) CFP和chife editor的邀稿文內,的確指出歡迎ZZZZZZ類的稿件, (2) 去年在該期刊中,也發表了純偏向於演算法的文章. (3) 到今天已逾一周,尚未收到任何回應, 因此想請問各位前輩,是否對此類狀況有過經驗. 目前我是應該繼續等?還是直接再寄一封信給C.I.E.? 另外,若欲再寄信, 在措辭行文上,大家有什麼建議的嗎? 謝謝! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.34.38.45 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/AfterPhD/M.1504391212.A.917.html ※ 編輯: YoursEver (1.34.38.45), 09/03/2017 07:22:45
→
09/03 07:41, , 1F
我會建議再等等 對方有回信再說(畢竟decision已下) 如
09/03 07:41, 1F
→
09/03 07:41, , 2F
果一直寄結果大概也不可能接受 不想等的話 就轉投吧
09/03 07:41, 2F
→
09/03 07:50, , 3F
通常慣例是會等多久呢? 我上次遇到這種事,在我寄信一周
09/03 07:50, 3F
→
09/03 07:52, , 4F
後就收到chief editor的回覆. 所以想請教,大部分的案例
09/03 07:52, 4F
→
09/03 07:52, , 5F
中,等多久才是正常的?
09/03 07:52, 5F
推
09/03 11:48, , 6F
如果主編是在美國 目前是勞工節連假 我會建議等到下週後再聯
09/03 11:48, 6F
→
09/03 11:48, , 7F
絡一次 題外話 感覺reviewer3頗受重視 抗辯能否成功 大概跟
09/03 11:48, 7F
→
09/03 11:48, , 8F
您或是其他作者的份量比較有關......
09/03 11:48, 8F
推
09/03 15:51, , 9F
感覺是因為期刊只要看到像reviewer3那類的討論,通常都
09/03 15:51, 9F
→
09/03 15:51, , 10F
會比較保守(傾向scope對了才繼續審查...)
09/03 15:51, 10F
推
09/03 15:54, , 11F
既然這樣的話,繼續等看看C.I.E.的回信~~~~
09/03 15:54, 11F
推
09/03 17:05, , 12F
跟reviewer認真就輸了
09/03 17:05, 12F
→
09/03 18:01, , 13F
setu大,請問美國的勞工節連假到什麼時候結束呢?
09/03 18:01, 13F
→
09/03 18:02, , 14F
chief editor在美國沒錯(Washington).
09/03 18:02, 14F
推
09/04 03:08, , 15F
放到台灣星期二 但是又不少人會多請個一兩天 再加上剛回來一
09/04 03:08, 15F
→
09/04 03:08, , 16F
堆事等著處理 我覺得多等一個星期還算合理
09/04 03:08, 16F
→
09/04 16:45, , 17F
C.I.E 是什麼?
09/04 16:45, 17F
→
09/05 07:57, , 18F
就眼手腦不同調,不小心把eic打成cie.
09/05 07:57, 18F
→
09/05 20:06, , 19F
有些reviewer為了幫自己當主編或副編的期刊拉生意就會給這
09/05 20:06, 19F
→
09/05 20:06, , 20F
種很賤的review，連改投哪個期刊都講明了。
09/05 20:06, 20F
→
09/06 08:10, , 21F
R3建議轉投的journal(現階段)都比我投的這個好...
09/06 08:10, 21F
→
09/06 08:13, , 22F
如果真的是拉生意...我不介意,我怕拖時間scoop.
09/06 08:13, 22F
‣ 更多 YoursEver 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Pgp0iaN (AfterPhD)