[問題] 判決認定部分
請問一下以下的狀況是合理的嗎?
某看板板主針對某使用者意圖挑釁的判決認定,
是因為組務板的小組長發表的判決文中,牽扯到使用者公開檢舉申訴前任板主的案件,
認定該使用者與前任板主有公開的糾紛證據,
(但是在該看板裡,並沒有該使用者與此前任板主有任何糾紛的判決)
若看板板主回應中,有這樣的說明:
『挑釁之認定,是與您的公開前後行為有相關的
而組務板與本板有相當的正相關,並非完全無關』
所以該使用者應該要特別謹言慎行,
如果是別人用一樣的字句,會是難已判別,
可是因為是該使用者的發言,就變成了是意圖挑釁。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 128.214.20.122
※ 編輯: antibonding 來自: 128.214.20.122 (09/14 20:30)
推
09/14 22:00, , 1F
09/14 22:00, 1F
→
09/14 22:02, , 2F
09/14 22:02, 2F
→
09/14 22:16, , 3F
09/14 22:16, 3F
→
09/14 22:17, , 4F
09/14 22:17, 4F
推
09/14 22:18, , 5F
09/14 22:18, 5F
→
09/14 22:27, , 6F
09/14 22:27, 6F
→
09/14 22:33, , 7F
09/14 22:33, 7F
推
09/14 22:41, , 8F
09/14 22:41, 8F
→
09/14 23:17, , 9F
09/14 23:17, 9F
→
09/14 23:31, , 10F
09/14 23:31, 10F
→
09/14 23:33, , 11F
09/14 23:33, 11F
→
09/14 23:34, , 12F
09/14 23:34, 12F
→
09/14 23:37, , 13F
09/14 23:37, 13F
→
09/15 01:50, , 14F
09/15 01:50, 14F
→
09/15 02:49, , 15F
09/15 02:49, 15F
推
09/15 11:30, , 16F
09/15 11:30, 16F
→
09/15 11:43, , 17F
09/15 11:43, 17F
→
09/15 13:22, , 18F
09/15 13:22, 18F
→
09/15 13:23, , 19F
09/15 13:23, 19F
推
09/16 00:41, , 20F
09/16 00:41, 20F